Abstract
In 1859 Herbert Spencer recognised that the key curriculum issue was not what to include but what to leave out. ‘What to leave out’ marked a shift in curriculum discourse from a search for universal approaches and absolute principles towards curriculum questions understood as only resolvable relative to particular social contexts. Yet outdoor education is frequently explained and justified in universal, absolute terms that are incapable of resolving the question of outdoor education’s educational worth in any particular situation. The first part of this study outlines some necessary links between curriculum discourse and outdoor education theory. The second uses outdoor education textbooks to investigate how context-free rationales for outdoor education have been framed. It found textbooks used one or more rhetorical devices: (1) treating education as personal development, with only limited acknowledgment of the social functions and contexts of education, (2) omitting the outdoors from aims and purposes, or treating the outdoors as monolithic, and (3) describing aims and purposes in broad and abstract terms. Adopting any or all of these positions drastically reduced the capacities of the proffered theories to (a) help determine if any given program was necessary or (b) help determine what programs were necessary. The article concludes that the evident flaws in textbooks indicate a more widespread failure in the outdoor education literature to comprehend curriculum questions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barcan, A. (1980). A history of Australian education. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1986). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.
Bowers, C. A. (1993). Education, cultural myths, and the ecological crisis: Towards deep changes. New York: State University of New York Press.
Brookes, A. (2002a). Gilbert White never came this far South. Naturalist knowledge and the limits of universalist environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 73–87.
Brookes, A. (2002b). Lost in the Australian bush: outdoor education as curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 405–425.
Dahlgren, L. O., & Szczepanski, A. (1998). Outdoor education. Literary education and sensory experience. Linköping: Kinda Education Centre.
Davis-Berman, J., & Berman, D. S. (1994). Wilderness therapy. Foundations, theory and research. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Ford, P. M. (1981). Principles and practices of outdoor environmental education. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gair, N. P. (1997). Outdoor education. Theory and practice. London: Cassell.
Hamilton, D. (1990). Curriculum history. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Hovelynck, J., & Peeters, L. (2003). Laughter, smiles and grins: The role of humor in learning and facilitating. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 3(2), 171–183.
Illich, I. (1973). Deschooling society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. A pyschological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luckner, J. L., & Nadler, R. S. (1997). Processing the experience. Strategies to enhance and generalize learning (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia. London: Oxford University Press.
McRae, K. (Ed.). (1990). Outdoor and environmental education: Diverse purposes and practices. Melbourne: Macmillan.
Miles, J. C., & Priest, S. (Eds.). (1990). Adventure education. State College, PA: Venture.
Parker, T. M., & Meldrum, K. I. (1973). Outdoor Education. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
Priest, S. (1999). Introduction. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure programming (pp. xiii–xiv). State College, PA: Venture.
Richards, A. (1990). Kurt Hahn. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure education (pp. 67–74). State College, PA: Venture.
Ross, A. (2000). Curriculum construction and critique. London: Falmer Press.
Smith, J. W., Carson, R. E., Donaldson, G. W., & Masters, H. B. (1963). Outdoor education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Spencer, H. (1911). Essays on education and kindred subjects. London: Dent.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Andrew Brookes is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Outdoor Education and Environment, La Trobe University, Bendigo. His research interest focuses on outdoor education and relationships with place, cultural dimensions of outdoor education, and interdisciplinary perspective on outdoor education. His research interests also include safety in outdoor education; he is presently engaged on a major review of fatalities in Australia outdoor education since 1960.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brookes, A. Astride a long-dead horse: Mainstream outdoor education theory and the central curriculum problem. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 8, 22–33 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400801
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400801