Abstract
It has been argued that to increase societal impact behavioral researchers must do more to address problems of obvious practical importance. The basic science wing of behavior analysis has been described as especially detached from this goal, but is it really necessary that basic science demonstrate social relevance? If so, why hasn’t this occurred more often, and what can be done to improve the status quo? To address these questions and to stimulate discussion about the future of basic behavior science, I describe two widely embraced arguments in favor of pure basic science (that which is undertaken without concern for practical applications); explain why a translational research agenda is likely to better recruit tangible support for basic science; propose that addressing practical problems does not require basic science to abandon its focus on fundamental principles; and identify some possible impediments to translational innovation that may need to be addressed for basic behavior science to increase its translational footprint.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational. New York: Harper.
Branch, M. N. (1991). On the difficulty of studying “basic” behavioral processes in humans. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 107–110.
Chomsky, N. H. (1959). A review of B.F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 25, 26–58.
Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2004). Conduits of translation in behavior-science bridge research. In J. E. Burgos & E. Ribes (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological applications in behavior science: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 45–84). Guadalajara, Mexico: University of Guadalajara Press.
Cullen, C. (1981). The flight to the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 81–83.
Davison, M., & Baum, W. (2000). Choice in a variable environment: Every reinforcer counts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 1–24.
Derenne, A. (2010). Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on bilateral facial symmetry. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 485–492.
Dymond, S., Bateman, H., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Derived transformation of children’s pregambling game playing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 353–363.
Dymond, S., & Critchfield, T. S. (2001). Neither dark age nor Renaissance: Research and authorship trends in the experimental analysis of human behavior (1980–1999). The Behavior Analyst, 24, 241–253.
Elliott, A. J., Morgan, K., Fuqua, R. W., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling, A. (2005). Self- and cross-citations in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 1993–2003. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 559–563.
Epting, L. K., & Critchfield, T. S. (2006). Selfediting: On the relation between behavioral and psycholinguistic approaches. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 211–224.
Erjavec, M., Lovett, V. E., & Horne, P. J. (2009). Do infants show generalized imitation of gestures? II. The effects of skills training and multiple exemplar matching training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 355–376.
Fantino, E., & Kennelly, A. (2009). Sharing the wealth: Factors influencing resource allocation in the sharing game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 337–354.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Findley, J. D. (1966). Programmed environments for the experimental analysis of human behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 827–848). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Friedman, M. I., & Fisher, S. P. (1998). Handbook in effective instructional strategies: Evidence for decision-making. Columbia, SC: Institute for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Education.
Guinther, P. M., & Dougher, M. J. (2010). Semantic false memories in the form of derived relational intrusions following training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 329–347.
Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobe-havioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.
Hake, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.
Hyten, C., & Chase, P. N. (1991). An analysis of self-editing: Method and preliminary findings. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 67–81). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Iversen, I. H., & Lattal, K. A. (Eds.). (1991), Experimental analysis of behavior, Part 1. New York: Elsevier Science.
Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505–518.
Laties, V. G. (2003). Behavior analysis and the growth of behavioral pharmacology. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 235–252.
Laties, V. G. (2008). The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at fifty. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 95–109.
Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.
Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.
Mace, F. C., McComas, J. J., Mauro, B. C., Progar, P. R., Taylor, B., Ervin, R., et al. (2010). Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior increases resistance to extinction: Clinical demonstration, animal modeling, and clinical test of one solution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 349–367.
Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science ofdiscounting.Washington,DC:APABooks.
Mazur, J. E. (1991). Choice. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior, Part 1 (pp. 219–250). New York: Elsevier Science.
Mazur, J. E. (2010). Editorial: Translational research in JEAB. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 291–292.
Miller, N. E. (1985). The value of behavioral research on animals. American Psychologist, 40, 423–440.
Perone, M. (1985). On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 185–189.
Perone, M. (2002). Behavior analysis and translational research. Association for Behavior Analysis Newsletter, 26(3), 1, 3–4.
Poling, A. (2010). Looking to the future: Will behavior analysis survive and prosper? The Behavior Analyst, 33, 6–17.
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice, and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15–22.
Roediger, R. (2003, March). What happened to behaviorism? APS Observer. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id51540
Rogers, C. E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rutherford, A. (2009). Beyond the box: B. F. Skinner’s technology of behavior from laboratory to life, 1950s–1970s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Schlinger, H. D. (2010). Perspectives on the future of behavior analysis: Introductory comments. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 1–5.
Schlund, M. W., & Cataldo, M. F. (2005). Integrating functional neuroimaging and human operant research: Brain activation correlated with presentation of discriminative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 505–519.
Shapero, A. (1966). Effects of government R and D contracting on mobility and regional resources. In W. H. Gruber & D. G. Marquis (Eds.), Factors in the transfer of technology (pp. 179–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. Oxford, UK: Basic Books.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunnstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin.
Tversky, D., & Kahneman, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiner, H. (1964). Conditioning history and human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 383–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Critchfield, T.S. Translational contributions of the experimental analysis of behavior. BEHAV ANALYST 34, 3–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392227
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392227