Abstract
Discrete trial teaching (DTT) procedures have proven effective in teaching language to children with autism. Discrete trial teaching uses a highly structured, fast-paced format of instruction that is typically conducted in a one-to-one situation at a desk or table with minimal distractions. We compared this traditional model of DTT to a version of DTT in which instruction was embedded within the context of a more naturalistic, activity-based environment. However, all of the other characteristics of DTT (e.g., pacing, tight stimulus control, targets selected by the teacher) were retained. Receptive discriminations were taught to 2 4-year-old boys, diagnosed with autism in traditional or embedded DTT. Results showed that for both boys, traditional and embedded DTT were equally effective and efficient. Additionally, measures were collected on participant affect and a concurrent-chains preference evaluation was used to determine which teaching procedure was preferred by the participants. The two procedures produced similar levels of positive and negative affect and were equally preferred by 1 participant while embedded DTT produced more positive affect and was more preferred by the other.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carr, E. G., Newsom, C. D., & Binkoff, J. A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 101–117.
Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., LeBlanc, L. A., & Carpenter, M. H. (1999). Naturalistic teaching strategies (NaTS) to teach speech to children with autism: Historical perspective, development, and current practice. California School Psychologist, 4, 30–46.
Daugherty, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschoolers with developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 213–221.
Delprato, D. J. (2001). Comparisons of discrete-trial and normalized behavioral language intervention for young children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31, 315–325.
Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2010). Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior: A treatment-selection model for practicing behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 22–32.
Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85.
Hanley, G. P. (2010). Identifying effective and preferred behavior-change programs: A case for the objective measurement of social validity. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 13–21.
Koegel, R. L., Bimbela, A., & Schreibman, L. (1996). Collateral effects of parent training on family interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 347–359.
Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E. (1998). Increasing speech intelligibility in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 241–251.
Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, R. L. (2006). Pivotal response treatments for autism: Communication, social and academic development. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Surratt, A. (1992). Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22, 141–153.
Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for teaching non-verbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–199.
Koegel, R. L., Openden, D., Fredeen, R. M., & Koegel, L. K. (2006). The basics of pivotal response treatment. In R. L. Koegel & L. K. Koegel (Eds.), Pivotal response treatments for Autism: Communication, social and academic development (pp. 3–30). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Koegel, R. L., & Williams, J. A. (1980). Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 537–547.
Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (Eds.). (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: DRL Books.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.
Neef, N. A., Walters, J., & Egel, A. L. (1984). Establishing generative yes/no responses in developmentally disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 453–460.
Newsom, C. B. (1998). Autistic disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (2nd ed.; pp. 416–467), New York: Guilford.
Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Hui Ma, C., Edrisinha, C., Cannella, H., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Effects of embedded instruction versus discrete-trial training on self-injury, correct responding, and mood in a child with autism. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 196–203.
Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.
Smith, T. (2001). Discrete trial training in the treatment of autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 86–92.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1999). The need for both discrete trial and natural environment language training for children with autism. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams & J. E. Carr (Eds.) Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 139–156). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Williams, J. A., Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. (1981). Response-reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 53–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Erin Conner, Kelly Cox, Brittany Kirksey, Trevor Ramsey, Lauren Smith, Lindsey Smith, and Kristen Vaughn for their assistance with data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geiger, K.B., Carr, J.E., LeBlanc, L.A. et al. Teaching Receptive Discriminations to Children With Autism: A Comparison of Traditional and Embedded Discrete Trial Teaching. Behav Analysis Practice 5, 49–59 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391823
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391823