Abstract
One possibility suggested by the literature for maximizing the efficiency of behavior modification procedures concerns the relationship between target behaviors and their reinforcers. Therefore, in this experiment three severely autistic children were taught a total of six new target behaviors (in a multiple baseline design) employing two different response-reinforcer relationships: (1) those where the target behaviors were a direct part of the response chain required to procure a reinforcer (e.g., opening the lid of a container to obtain a food reward inside the container); and (2) those where the target behavior was an indirect part of the chain leading to the reinforcer (e.g., the therapist handing the child a food reward after the child had opened the lid of an empty container). In all cases, the results showed rapid acquisition only when the target behavior was a direct part of the chain leading to the reinforcer. The results are discussed in terms of several possible conceptualizations concerning efficient reinforcement contingencies, and in terms of their implications for teaching autistic children.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ferster, C. B. Arbitrary and natural reinforcement.Psychological Record, 1967,17, 341–347.
Grice, G. R. The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948,38, 1–16.
Grossman, K. E. Color learning by honey bees under conditions of immediate and delayed reinforcement.Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 1971,29, 28–41.
Hewett, F. M. Teaching speech to an autistic child through operant conditioning.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1965,35, 927–936.
Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F.The analysis of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
Hull, C. L. The goal gradient hypothesis and maze learning.Psychological Review, 1932,39, 25–43.
Kazdin, A. E. The influence of behavior preceding a reinforced response on behavior change in the classroom.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 299–310.
Kimble, G. A.Hilgard and Marquis' conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.
Koegel, R. L., & Egel, A. L. Motivating autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979,88, 418–426.
Koegel, R. L., Firestone, P. B., Kramme, K. W., & Dunlap, G. Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 521–528.
Koegel, R. L., & Rincover, A. Treatment of psychotic children in a classroom environment: I. Learning in a large group.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 45–59.
Koegel, R. L., Russo, D. C., & Rincover, A. Assessing and training teachers in the generalized use of behavior modification with autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 197–205.
Lovaas, O. I.The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Irvington, 1977.
Lovaas, O. I., Berberich, J. P., Perloff, B. F., & Schaeffer, B. Acquisition of imitative speech in schizophrenic children.Science, 1966,151, 705–707.
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973,6, 131–166.
Lovaas, O. I., & Newsom, C. D. Behavior modification with psychotic children. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.),Handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., & Koegel, R. L. A behavior modification approach to the treatment of autistic children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1974,4, 111–129.
Rincover, A. Variables affecting stimulus-fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978,87, 541–553.
Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. Classroom treatment of autistic children: II. Individualized instruction in a group.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977,5(2), 113–126. (a)
Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. Research on the education of autistic children: Recent advances and future directions. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.),Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press, 1977. (b)
Rincover, A., Newsom, C. D., Lovaas, O. I., & Koegel, R. L. Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,24, 312–323.
Risley, T. R., & Wolf, M. M. Establishing functional speech in echolalic children.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1967,5, 73–88.
Schreibman, L. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 91–112.
Schreibman, L., & Carr, E. G. Elimination of echolalic responding to questions through the training of a generalized verbal response.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978,11(4), 453–463.
Schreibman, L., & Koegel, R. L. A guideline for planning behavior modification programs for autistic children. In S. M. Turner, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of clinical behavior therapy. New York: Wiley, 1980.
Shiroiwa, Y. Lever pulling response speed in children as a function of delay of reinforcement and incentive value.Japanese Psychological Research, 1975,17, 192–196.
Skinner, B. F.The role of the contrived reinforcer. Paper presented at the 10th annual Southern California Behavior Modification Conference, Los Angeles, 1979.
Spence, K. W.Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Research Grants MH 28210 and MH 28231, and by U.S. Office of Education Research Grant G007802084 from the Bureau for the Education of the Handicapped. Portions of the results described in this article were discussed in a presentation at the 13th Annual AABT Convention in San Francisco, 1979. The authors are particularly grateful to Andrew Egel, Roberta Elman, Janis Costello, and Karen Britten, for their helpful comments, and to Jody Fisher and Gina Richman, for their assitance in the data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koegel, R.L., Williams, J.A. Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 8, 537–547 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916505
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916505