Abstract
This article deals with the relationship between industrialization of agriculture and the environment in developing countries. We specifically focus on livestock production and regulation. We develop a simple economic framework to demonstrate the effect of location on intensification of industrial activity in farming, and discuss this issue in the context of urbanization and economic growth in developing countries. Policy implications of the model are discussed in light of the experience of developed countries in regulating livestock pollution and other externalities. We argue that environmental problems from agricultural industrialization in developing countries may pose major challenges. In the case of livestock production, these are compounded by production intensity, high population densities in periurban and urban areas, and the generally lower public health standards. As the recent outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and avian influenza epidemics in Asia suggest, the new era of globalization and the onset of a free world trade regime points to the urgent need for developing countries to install inspection and enforcement mechanisms that ensure product safety and quality, as well as minimize the adverse effects on the environment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bracket RE (2006) Testimony before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, United States Senate
Bouwman P, Batjes NH, Bridges EM (1992) Methodology and data used to estimate natural N2O emissions. International Workshop on World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials, August 24–27, Wageningen
Chantalakhana C (1996) Animal industries in Thailand and possible impacts of trade liberalization. Proceedings of the 8th AAAP Animal Science Congress, 13–19 October, Tokyo
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1995) Trade and transboundary pollution. American Economic Review 85:716–737
Delgado CM, Courbois C, Rosegrant M (1998) Global food demand and the contribution of livestock as we enter the new millennium. Conference on Foods, Lands and Livelihoods: Setting Research Agendas for Animal Science, January 27–30, Nairobi, Kenya
Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui S, Courbois C (1999) Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. International Food Policy Research Institute/Food and Agriculture Organization/International Livestock Research Institute
Fisher DK, Sonka S, Westgren R (2004) Strategic decision making in quasi-governmental sector: the Illinois Soybean Program Operating Board. International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior 7:42–65
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1992) The world hides, skins and derived products economy 1970 to 1990. Supplement to the world statistical compendium for raw hides and skins leather and leather footwear 1972–1990. FAO, Rome
FAO (1995) World agriculture towards 2010. Alexandratos N (ed) Wiley, Chichester, UK
FAO (2003) World statistical compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather foot wear 1984–2002. FAO, Rome
FAOSTAT (1997, 2006) FAO statistical databases. FAO, Rome
Frarey LC, Pratt SJ (1995) Environmental regulation of livestock production operations. Natural Resource and Environment Winter: 8–12
Hamilton ND (1997) Reaping what we have sown: public policy consequences of agricultural industrialization and the legal implications of a changing production system. Drake Law Review 45:289–310
Herbert D (2001) Foot-and-mouth virus: a global dilemma. CNN World News, March 13, 2001
Holleman JT (1992) In Arkansas which comes first, the chicken or the environment? Tulane Environmental Law Journal 6:21–60
King LJ (2006) CDC food safety activities and the recent E. coli spinach outbreak. Testimony before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, United States Senate
MacKenzie D (1998) This little piggy fell ill. New Scientist September 12, pp. 18–19
Pratt SJ, Frarey L, Carr A (1997) A comparison of US and UK law regarding pollution from agricultural runoff. Drake Law Review 45:159–217
Steinfeld H (1998) Livestock production in the Asia and Pacific Region—current status, issues and trends. World Animal Review 90:14–21
Steinfeld H, de Haan C, Blackburn H (1997) Options to address livestock—environment interactions. World Animal Review 88:15–20
Taiganides EP (1992) Pig waste management and recycling: the Singapore experience. International Development Research Center, Ottawa
Upton M (1997) Intensification or extensification: which has the lowest environmental burden? World Animal Review 88:21–29
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Global Impact Domain-Methane Emissions. Consultant report for the Livestock and the Environment Study. USEPA, Washington D.C.
Verheijen LAHM, Wiersema D, Hulshoff Pol LW, de Wit J (1996) Management of waste from animal product processing. International Agricultural Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands
World Health Organization (WHO) (2003a) Summary tables of SARS cases by country, 1 November 2002–7 August 2003. http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/. Cited
WHO (2003b) Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): status of the outbreak and lessons for the immediate future. WHO, Geneva
WHO (1997) World health statistics quarterly 50, 1–2. WHO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Chakravorty, U., Fisher, D.K. & Umetsu, C. Environmental effects of intensification of agriculture: livestock production and regulation. Environ Econ Policy Stud 8, 315–336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353963
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353963