Skip to main content

Environmental Impacts of Industrial Livestock Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Farm Animal, Wildlife and Food Safety Law

Abstract

Population growth, urbanization, changing economies and food preferences have increased pressure on the agricultural sector and on livestock production and related feed crops in particular. The FAO expects an increase of 70 % in world annual agricultural production from 2005/2007 to 2050 to feed the rising population, which is expected to grow by 40 % over the period (Conforti, Looking ahead in world food and agricultural perspectives to 2050, 2011). Much of the increase in crop (cereal) production is expected to come about as a result of increased demand for feed for livestock (Conforti, Looking ahead in world food and agricultural perspectives to 2050, 2011). To keep up with the demand for animal products, the method of production is changing. In the United States and increasingly around the world, family farms raising small numbers of livestock have given way to industrialized livestock practices often referred to as Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations or CAFOs. Livestock facilities confine ever increasing numbers of animals indoors. Vitamin supplements allow livestock to be confined indoors without sunlight and allow the production of offspring year round, while subtherapeutic use of antibiotics allow livestock to be confined in greater numbers and close quarters, raising the number of livestock that could be produced on a given feedlot or facility (Steinfeld, Livestock in a changing landscape: drivers, consequences, and responses, 2010). Genetics management and nutrition have also allowed animal production operations to intensify, and for the productivity of each animal to increase. For example, in the United States in 1957 it took a broiler chicken 101 days and 17.7 pounds of feed to reach market weight, while in 2001 it took only 32 days and only 5.9 pounds of feed. This has allowed US meat production to skyrocket by over 250 % over the past half-century (Pew Commission, Putting meat on the table: industrial farm animal production in America, 2008). Huge amounts of animal waste are a consequence of industrialized livestock. Inadequate regulation of manure deposition and disposal has resulted in significant air, water, and soil pollution. Animal waste from intensified operations is often disposed of on agricultural land year-round, and in far greater amounts than the land can absorb. Soils are over-fertilized thus releasing toxic runoff, and leaching contaminants. The runoff can flow into water bodies causing severe ecological harm, and decomposing waste can release dust particles, bacteria, endotoxins, and volatile organic compounds, as well as hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and other odorous substances into the air (Halden and Schwab, Environmental impact of industrial farm animal production, 2008). Manure often contains many problematic substances including high levels of nitrogen and phosphorous, endocrine disruptors that can interfere with hormonal signaling in animals and humans, antibiotics that can nurture drug-resistant populations in the soil they are reach, resistant forms of bacteria, and arsenic (Halden and Schwab, Environmental impact of industrial farm animal production, 2008). As noted above, the increase in livestock production increases demand for feed crops thus requiring intensification of agricultural land use and resulting in a host of environmental costs on varying levels including increased erosion, lower soil fertility, reduced biodiversity, pollution of ground water, eutrophication of rivers and lakes, and impacts on atmospheric constituents, climate, and ocean waters (Steinfeld, Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options, 2006). This chapter will address those impacts. It is organized by medium of impact. Section 1.2 addresses air pollution and climate-change related impacts. Section 1.3 provides background on water consumption and pollution related to industrial livestock. Section 1.4 takes on the range of land-based impacts including habitat, forestry and desertification. The text provides an overview of the impacts but offers specific examples from a number of countries. Many of the impacts addressed are covered in more depth and/or with more specificity in later chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anadón JD et al (2013) Effect of woody-plant encroachment on livestock production in North and South America. PNAS 111(35):12948–12953. doi:10.1073/pnas.132058511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asad M et al (1999) Management of water resources: bulk water pricing in Brazil. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Asner GP et al (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261–299. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie JEM, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (eds) (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker D (2007) The rise and predictable fall of globalized industrial agriculture. International Forum on Globalization, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman S, Mikkelsen R (2009) Ammonia emissions from agricultural operations: livestock. Better Crops 93(1):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand K (ed) (2005) South America invaded. GISP Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighter Green (2013) Industrial agriculture, livestock farming and climate change: global social, cultural, ecological, and ethical impacts of an unsustainable industry. Brighter Green and the Global Forest Coalition. http://globalforestcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MM_Brighter-Green-and-the-Global-Forest-Coalition_WSF_Industrial_Livestock-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015

  • Bringezu S et al (2014) Assessing global land use: balancing consumption with sustainable supply. UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder J et al (2007) Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality. Environ Health Perspect 115:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chislock MF et al (2013) Eutrophication: causes, consequences, and controls in aquatic ecosystems. Nat Educ Knowl 4(4):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforti P (ed) (2011) Looking ahead in world food and agricultural perspectives to 2050. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula L et al (2009) Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. FAO/IIED/IFAD, London/Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife--threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–449. doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci Soc Am 48(2):255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural Intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond 268:25–29. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011) Biodiversity for food and agriculture: contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world. FAO and The Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2014) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: opportunities and challenges. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Formiga-Johnsson RM et al (2007) The politics of bulk water pricing in Brazil: lessons from the Paríba do Sul Basin. Water Policy 9:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN et al (2007) International trade in meat: the tip of the pork chop. R Swed Acad Sci 36(8):622–629

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO (2008) Report to congressional requesters: concentrated animal feeding operations

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber et al. (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and migration opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK (2015) Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science 347(6220):377–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halden RU, Schwab KJ (2008) Environmental impact of industrial farm animal production. A report of the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. A project of the Pew Charitable Trusts and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. www.ncifap.org/_images/212-4_EnvImpact_tc_Final.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2015

  • Hasan MR, Halwart M (eds) (2009) Fish as feed inputs for aquaculture: practices, sustainability and implications. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman I (2011) Livestock biodiversity and sustainability. Livest Sci 139:69–79. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman I, From T, Boerma D (2014) Ecosystem services provided by livestock species and breeds, with special consideration to the contributions of small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori Y, Stuhlberger C, Simonett O (eds) (2012) Desertification: a visual synthesis. UNCCD http://www.unccd.int/en/resources/publication/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 9 Jan 2014

  • Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humane Society International (2011) An HSI report: the impact of industrial farming

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenring R (2010) Pesticides and the loss of biodiversity. Pesticide Action Network Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2000) IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. Fifth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, Nairobi, Kenya, 15–26 May 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson L et al (2005) Agrobiodiversity: a new science agenda for biodiversity in support of sustainable agroecosystems. Diversitas

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DJ (2011) Crops for animal feed destroying Brazilian Savannah, WWF Warns. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/apr/11/meat-industry-food. Accessed 26 Jan 2015

  • Mack RN (1989) Temperate grasslands vulnerable to plant invasions: characteristics and consequences. In: Drake J et al (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York, pp 155–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN et al (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10(3):689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson PA et al (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine CA (2009) Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: a call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil. Glob Environ Chang 19:21–33. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA et al (2010) Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers Distrib 16:95–108. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00633.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2008) Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Glob Chang Biol 14:1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01575.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden D (ed) (2007) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (2014) Restoration and spending plan: marks farm natural resource damages settlement. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/fish_marine_pdf/mfarmresplfin.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2015

  • Nicholson SE, Tucker CJ, Ba MB (1998) Desertification, drought, and surface vegetation: an example from the West African Sahel. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:815–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara FP (2011) The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte J et al (2007) Industrial livestock production and global health risks. Pro-poor livestock policy initiative

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production (2008) Putting meat on the table: industrial farm animal production in America

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2009) Enteric fermentation mitigation. http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/Enteric-Fermentation-09-09.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2015

  • Pimental D et al (1997) Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 47(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2005) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 332–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Rischkowsky B, Pilling D (eds) (2007) The state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson B, Pinstrup-Andersen P (2010) Global land acquisition: neo-colonialism or development opportunity? Springer Science + Business Media B.V. & International Society for Plant Pathology 2:271–283. doi:10.1007/s12571-010-0068-1

  • Rodewald M (2015) Manure spills putting water supply at risk. Green Bay Press Gazette. http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/investigations/2015/02/06/manure-spills-water-supply/22983669/. Accessed 4 Mar 2015

  • Rudel T, Roper J (1997) Forest fragmentation in the humid tropics: a cross-national analysis. Singapore J Trop Geogr 18:99–109. doi:10.1111/1467-9493.00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK, Bates D, Machinguiashi R (2002) A tropical forest transition? agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92(1):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakirkin et al. (2012) Dust emissions from cattle feeding operations. In: Air quality in animal agriculture. Extension. http://www.extension.org/sites/default/files/Dust.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2015

  • Schimel D, Stephens BB, Fisher JB (2014) Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407302112

  • Sharma S (2014) The need for feed: China’s demand for industrialized meat and its impacts. IATP

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T, Jutzi S (2006a) Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 25(2):505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H et al (2006b) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H et al (eds) (2010) Livestock in a changing landscape: drivers, consequences, and responses, vol 1. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Table (2009) Air quality. http://www.sustainabletable.org/print/266. Accessed 6 Mar 2015

  • Swanepoel F et al (eds) (2010) The role of livestock in developing communities: enhancing multifunctionality. University of the Free State and CTA, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp L (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76(2):265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284. doi:10.1126/science.1057544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T et al (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCCD (2013) Migratory species and desertification factsheet. http://www.unccd.int/en/media-center/MediaNews/Pages/highlightdetail.aspx?HighlightID=194. Accessed 9 Jan 2015

  • UNCTD (2013) Trade and environment review 2014: wake up before it is too late. United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2014) Assessing global land use: balancing consumption with sustainable supply. A report of the working group on land and soils of the International Resource Panel

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2008) National wildlife refuge system. Prescribed grazing. Managing invasive plants: concepts, principles, and practices. http://www.fws.gov/invasives/staffTrainingModule/methods/grazing/practice.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2015

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Agriculture. In: DRAFT inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2013. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/pdfs/usinventoryreport/US-GHG-Inventory-2015-Chapter-5-Agriculture.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2015

  • Vanotti MB, Szogi AA (2008) Water quality improvements of wastewater from confined animal feeding operations after advanced treatment. J Environ Qual 37:S-86–S-96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey DE et al (eds) (2011) Heavy metals. In Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability: natural resources and sustainability. Berkshire Publishing Group, Great Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1999) Response of soil microbial biomass dynamics, activity and plant litter decomposition to agricultural intensification over a seven-year period. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1707–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welton S, Biasutti M, Gerrard MB (2014) Legal and scientific integrity in advancing a “Land Degradation Neutral World”. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School

    Google Scholar 

  • York M (2005) Workers trying to contain effects of big spill upstate. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/15/nyregion/15dip.html. Accessed 4 Mar 2015

  • Youyong Z (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406:718–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. Kraham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kraham, S.J. (2017). Environmental Impacts of Industrial Livestock Production. In: Steier, G., Patel, K. (eds) International Farm Animal, Wildlife and Food Safety Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18002-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18002-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18001-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18002-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics