Abstract
Figs (Moraceae) and their pollinating wasps (Agaonidae) constitute a famous reciprocal mutualism in which figs provide some female flowers for the development of fig wasp offspring while the fig wasps pollinate fig flowers. However, figs also host many non-pollinating wasps which are either parasitoids or resource competitors of pollinators, and bring no benefit for figs and are detrimental to fig’ fitness. Our data onFicus racemosa in Xishuangbanna showed that the numbers of non-pollinators and the mature syconia without pollinator wasps increase in rainy season, especially in the highly fragmented forest. This might be because of the longer developing time of the syconia and thereby longer oviposition time to non-pollinators in the dry season. The galled flower and the viable seed percentages in dry seasons are also larger than in rainy seasons in both primary forest and fragmented forest, and the development of non-pollinators is mainly at the expense of pollinator wasps. Our results showed that there exists a discriminative seasonal impact of non-pollinators and fragmentation effects on population size of fig’s pollinators. This implies that fig/fig wasp mutualism is more fragile in dry season, and that the critical population size and breeding units of figs in seasonal area might be larger than previously estimated without considering the seasonal change of pollinator population.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anstett, M.G., Bronstein, J.L., and Hossasert-McKey, M. 1996. Resource allocation: a conflict in the fig-fig wasp mutualism.Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 417–428.
Anstett, M.G., Michaloud, G., and Kjellberg, F. 1995. Critical population size for fig/fig wasp mutualism in a seasonal environment: Effect and devolution of the duration of female receptivity.Oecologia 103: 453–461.
Bronstein, J.L. 1989. A mutualism at the edge of its range.Experientia 45: 622–637.
Bronstein, J.L. 1991. The non-pollinating wasp fauna ofFicus Pertusa: exploitation of a mutualism?Oikos 61: 175–186.
Bronstein, J.L. 200I. The exploitation of mutualisms.Ecology Letters 4: 277–287.
Bronstein, J.L. and Hossasert-McKey, M. 1996. Variation in reproductive success within a subtropical fig/pollinator mutualism.Journal of Biogeography 23: 433–446.
Bronstein, J.L. and McKey, D. 1989. The fig/pollinator mutualism: A model system for comparative biology.Experientia 45: 601–604.
Bronstein, J.L., Gouyon, P.H., Gliddon, C; Kjellberg, F., and Michaloud, G. 1990. The ecological consequence of flowering asynchrony in monoecious figs: a simulation study.Ecology 71: 2145–2156.
Colinvaux, P. 1986.Ecology. John Wiley & Sons Press, USA. 480 pp.
Compton, S.G. 1994. Pollinator limitation of fig tree reproduction on the island of Anak Krakatau (Indonesia).Biotropica 26: 180–186.
Compton, S.G. and Robertson, G. 1988. Complex interaction between mutualisms: ants ending Homopterans protect fig seeds and pollinators.Ecology 69: 1302–1305.
Comer, E.J.H. 1965. Check-list ofFicus in Asia and Australia with keys to identification.Garden’s Bulletin of Singapore 21: 1–186.
Harrison, R. 2005. Figs and the diversity of tropical rain forests.Bioscience 55: 1053–1064.
Herre, E.A. 1989. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps.Experientia 45: 637–647.
Herre, E.A. and West, S.A. 1997. Conflict of interest in a mutualism: documenting the elusive fig wasp-seed trade-off.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 264: 1501–1507.
Janzen, D.H. 1979. How to be a fig.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 13–51.
Joussellin, E., Hossaert-McKey, M., Herre, E.A., and Kjellberg, F. 2003. Why do fig wasps actively pollinate monoecious figs?Oecologia 134: 381–387.
Kerdelhué, C. and Rasplus, J. y. 1996. Non-pollinating Afrotropical fig wasps affect the fig-pollinator mutualism inFicus within thesubgenusSycomorus.Oikos 75: 3–14.
Kerdelhué, C., Rossi, J.P., and Rasplus, J.Y. 2000. Comparative community ecology studies on old world figs and fig wasps.Ecology 81: 2832–2849.
Kjellberg, F.E. and Maurice, S. 1989. Seasonality in reproductive phenology ofFicus: Its evolution and consequences.Experientia 45: 653–660.
Krebs, J.K. 1978.Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance (second edition). Harper & Row. Inc., New York. USA. 495 pp.
McKey, D. 1989. Population biology of figs: Application for conservation.Experientia 45: 661–673.
Nason, I.D., Herre, E.A., and Hamrick, J.L. 1998. The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource.Nature 391: 685–687.
Primack, R.B. 1998.Essentials of Conservation Biology (second edition). Sinauer Associates, MA, USA. 325 pp.
Shanahan, M., Harrison, R.D., Yamuna, R., Boen, W., and Thornton, W.B. 2005. Colonization of an island, Papua New Guinea, and an emergent island, Motrnot, in its caldera lake. V. Colonization by figs (Ficus spp.)., their dispersers and pollinators.Journal of Biogeography 28: 1365–1377.
Stephenson, A.G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions.Annual of Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253–279.
Stockwell, G.A., Hendry, A.P., and Kinnison, M.T 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 94–101.
Sun, B.L Wang, R. W., Hu, Z., and Li, Y.T 2008. The relation between two non-pollinating wasps oviposition and the fruit abscission onFicus racemosa. Acta Ecologica Sinica. In press.
Sun, R.Y 1992.Essential of Animal Ecology (2nd edition). Beijing Normal University, Beijing. 345 pp.
Thornton, L. W.B., Compton, S.G., and Wilson, C.N. 1996. The role of animal in the colonization of the Krakatau Islands by fig trees (Ficus species).Journal of Biogeography 23: 577–592.
Wang, R. W. and Zheng, Q. 2008. Structure of a figs wasp community: temporal segregation of oviposition and larval diets.Symbiosis 45: 113–116.
Wang, R. W., Shi, L., Ai, S.M., and Zheng, Q. 2008. Trade-off between the reciprocal mutualists: local resource availability oriented interaction in fig/fig wasp mutualism.Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 616–623.
Wang, R. W., Yang, C. Y, Zhao, G.F., and Yang, J.X. 2005a. Fragmentation effects on diversity of wasp community and its impact on fig/fig wasp interaction inFicus racemosa.Journal ofIntegrative Plant Biology 47: 144–152.
Wang, R.W., Yang, J.X., and Yang, D.R. 2005b. Seasonal changes in the trade-off among the fig-supported wasps and viable seeds in figs and their evolutionary implications.Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 47: 144–155.
West, S.A. and Herre, E.A. 1994. The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing wasps Idames and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 258: 67–72.
West, S.A., Herre, E.A., Windsor, D.M., and Green, P.R.S. 1996. The ecology and evolution of the New World non-pollinating fig wasp communities.Journal of Biogeography 23: 447–458.
Wiebes, J.T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 1–12.
Yang, C.Y., Wang, R.W., Zhao, G.F., and Yang, D.R. 2005. Diet of non-pollinator wasp and its impact on the fig-pollinator wasp mutualism.Zoology Research 26: 379–385.
Yang, D.R., Wang, R.W., and Song, Q.S. 2000. Rule of seasonal changes of theCeratolen sp. in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna, China.Forest Research 13: 477–484.
Yang, D.R., Zhao, T.Z., Wang, R. W., Zhang, Q.M., and Son, Q.S. 2001. Study on pollination ecology of fig wasp (Ceratosolen sp.) in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna.Zoology Research 22: 125–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, RW., Sun, BF. Seasonal change in the structure of fig-wasp community and its implication for conservation. Symbiosis 47, 77–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182290
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182290