Abstract
Surface alteration of implant screws after function may be associated with mechanicalffailure. This type of metal fatigue appears to be the most common cause of structural failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surface alteration of implant screws after function through an examination of used and unused implant screws via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In this study, abutment screws (Steri-oss, 3i, USA), gold retaining screws (3i, USA), and titanium retaining screws (3i, USA) were retrieved from patients, New, unused abutment, and retaining screws were prepared for a control group. Each of the old, used screws was retrieved with a screwdriver. The retrieved implant complex of a Steri-oss system was also prepared for this study. SEM investigation and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the abutment and retaining screws were then performed, as well as SEM investigation of a cross-sectioned sample of the retrieved implant complex in the case of new, unused implant screws, as-manufactured circumferential grooves were regularly examined and screw threads were sharply maintained. Before ultrasonic cleansing of old, used implant screws, there was a large amount of debris accumulation and corrosion products. After ultrasonic cleansing of old, used implant screws, circumferential grooves were examined were found to be randomly deepened and scratching increased. Also, dull screw fhreads were observed. More surface alterations after function were observed in titanium screws than in gold screws. Furthermore, more surface alteration was observed when the screws were retrieved with a driver than without a driver. These surface alterations after function may result in screw instability. Regular cleansing and exchange of screws is therefore recommended. We also recommend the use of gold screws over titanium screws, and careful manipulation of the driver.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. Cibirka and S. Nelson,J. Prosthet Dent. 85, 268 (2001).
D. Gratton, S. Aquilino, and C. Stanford,J. Prosthet Dent. 85, 47 (2001).
L. Jorneus, T. Jemt, and L. Carlsson,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,7, 353 (1992).
C. I. Park, H. C. Choe, and C. H. Chung,Met. Mater.-Int. 10, 549 (2004).
E. McGlumphy, and J. Holloway,Dental Clinic of North America,42, 71 (1998).
A. Helsingen, and T. Lyberg,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 9, 422 (1994).
R. Mengel, C. Buns, and C. Mengel,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,12, 91 (1998).
M. Jaarda, M. Razzog, andD. Gratton, J. Prosthet Dent. 71, 373 (1995).
H. Schliephake andG. Reiss, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8, 502 (1993).
J. Charles,J. Prosthet Dent. 81, 537 (1999).
W. Laney, T. Jemt, and D. Harris,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,9, 49 (1994).
A. Piattelli, M. Scarano, and E. Piattelli,J Periodontol. 69, 185 (1998).
A. Breeding and D. Dixon,Int. J. Prosthodont. 6, 435 (1993).
J. Schulte and J. Coffey,Implant Dent. 6, 28 (1997).
U. Lekholm, D. Van Steenberghe, and I. Herrman,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,9, 627 (1994).
B. Rangert and B. Langer,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,10, 326 (1995).
F. Takeshita, Y. Matsushita, Y. Ayukawa, and T. Suetsugu,J. Periodontol,67, 86 (1996).
H. Christoph,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11, 522 (1996).
E. Patterson and R. Johns,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants,7, 26 (1992).
P. Binon and M. McHugh,Int. J. Prosthodont. 9, 511 (1996).
R. Boggan, J. Strong, and C. Misch,J. Prosthet Dent. 82, 436 (1999).
P. Binon,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 5, 76 (2000).
J. aack and R. Sakaguchk,Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants.10, 529 (1995).
M. K. Son, H. C. Choe, and C. H. Chung,Met. Mater.-Int. 10, 153 (2004).
R. Revie,Corrosion Handbook, Electrochemical Society Series (eds. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), p. 870, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, MJ., Choe, HC. & Chung, CH. Surface characteristics of clinically used dental implant screws. Met. Mater. Int. 11, 449–456 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027494
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027494