Abstract
Salt marsh intertidal creeks are important habitats for dozens of species of nekton, but few studies have attempted to quantify patterns of tidal movement. We used the sweep flume, a new sampling device, to investigate relationships between depth and movements of nekton inside the mouths of intertidal creeks. Sweep flumes located in three creek beds were used to collect nekton at 10 cm increments (10–100 cm of water depth) during flood and ebb tides in the North Inlet, South Carolina, salt marsh. Of the 37 taxa collected, 13 comprised>99.5% of the total catch and were the focus of the analysis. A nonlinear mixed modeling procedure was used to determine, the depth at which each major taxon reached peak abundance during flood tides. With high degrees of spatial and temporal consistency, resident taxa entered early on the rpsing tide and transient taxa entered during mid to late tide. Depths of peak migrations varied among taxa and were consistent between creeks, days (within months), and years. As summer progressed, depths of peak migration increased for young-of-the-yearLeiostomus xanthurus, Lagodon rhomboides, Mugil curema, Eucinostomus argenteus, andLitopenaeus setiferus as their median sizes increased. Within tides, depths of migration increased as a function of size forL. xanthurus andM. curema. Comparisons between flood and ebb tides indicated that most taxa exited the creeks at approximately the same depths at which they entered. Relationships between major taxa pairs suggested that biotic interactions may have contributed to the structure of the migrations observed in this study. Our results are the first to demonstrate quantitatively that the migrations of nektonic taxa into intertidal creeks are structured and related to depth.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Allen, D. M., S. K. Service, andM. V. Ogburn-Matthews. 1992. Factors influencing the collection efficiency of estuarine fishes.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:234–244.
Allen, E. A., P. E. Fell, M. A. Peck, J. A. Gieg, C. R. Guthke, andM. D. Newkirk. 1994. Gut contents of common mummichogs,Fundulus heteroclitus L., in a restored impounded marsh and in natural reference marshes.Estuaries 17:464–471.
Bildstein, K. L., B. Christy, andP. Decoursey. 1981. Behavior and behavioral ecology abstracts from Southeastern Coastal and Estuarine Birds: A Conference Workshop, Georgetown, South Carolina USA.Bird Behavior 4:50–53.
Bishop, J. M. andM. H. Khan. 1991. Depth as a factor in abundance and size of juvenile penaeid shrimps in the absence of estuaries and marshes.Marine Biology 109:103–114.
Cain, R. L. andJ. M. Dean. 1976. Annual occurrence, abundance and diversity of fish in a South Carolina intertidal creek.Marine Biology 36:369–379.
Catrijsse, A., E. S. Makwaia, H. R. Dankwa, O. Hamerlynck, andM. A. Hemminga. 1994. Nekton communities of an intertidal creek of a European estuarine brackish marsh.Marine Ecology Progress Series 109:195–208.
Coull, B. C. andR. J. Feller. 1988. Site-to-site variability in abundance of meiobenthic copepods along a tidal gradient over 24 hours.Hydrobiologia 167/168:477–483.
Craig, J. K. andL. B. Crowder. 2000. Factors influencing habitat selection in fishes with a review of marsh ecosystems, p. 241–266.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger, (eds.). Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Deegan, L. A., J. E. Hughes, andR. A. Rountree. 2000. Salt marsh ecosystem support of marine transient species, p. 333–365.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger, (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Gibson, R. N. 1973. The intertidal movements and distribution of young fish on a sandy beach with special reference to the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 12:79–102.
Gibson, R. N. 1987. Patterns of movement in intertidal fishes, p. 55–63.In G. Chelassi and M. Vannini (eds.), Behavioral Adaptation to Intertidal Life. Plenum Press, New York.
Gibson, R. N. 2003. Go with the flow: Tidal migrations of marine animals.Hydrobiologia 503:153–161.
Haertel-Borer, S. S., D. M. Allen, andR. F. Dame. 2004. Fishes and shrimps are significant sources of dissolved inorganic nutrients in intertidal salt marsh creeks.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 311:79–99.
Harvey, B. C. andA. J. Stewart. 1991. Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams.Oecologia 87:336–342.
Hettler, W. F. 1989. Nekton use of regularly-flooded saltmarsh cordgrass habitat in North Carolina, USA.Marine Ecology Progress Series 56:111–118.
Kneib, R. T. 1984. Patterns in the utilization of the intertidal saltmarsh by larvae and juveniles ofFundulus heteroclitus (Linnaeus) andFundulus luciae (Baird).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 83:41–51.
Kneib, R. T. 1991. Flume weir for quantitative collection of nekton from vegetated intertidal habitats.Marine Ecology Progress Series 75:29–38.
Kneib, R. T. 1995. Behavior separates potential and realized effects of decapod crustaceans in salt marsh communities.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 193:239–256.
Kneib, R. T. 1997. Early life stages of resident nekton in intertidal marshes.Estuaries 20:214–230.
Kneib, R. T. 2000. Salt marsh ecoscapes and production transfers by estuarine nekton in the southeastern United States, p. 267–291.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Kneib, R. T. 2003. Bioenergetic and landscape considerations for scaling expectations of nekton production from intertidal marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 264:279–296.
Kneib, R. T. andS. L. Wagner. 1994. Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation.Marine Ecology Progress Series 106:227–238.
Kushlan, J. A. 1981. Sampling characteristics of enclosure fish trans.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:557–562.
Lorenz, J. J., C. C. McIvor, G. V. N. Powell, andP. C. Frederick. 1997. A drop net and removable walkway used to quantitatively sample fishes over wetland surfaces in the dwarf mangroves of the southern Everglades.Wetlands 17:346–359.
McIvor, C. C. andW. E. Odum. 1986. The flume net: A quantitative method for sampling fishes and macrocrustaceans on tidal marsh surfaces.Estuaries 9:219–224.
McIvor, C. C. andW. E. Odum. 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage.Ecology 69: 1341–1351.
Miller, J. M. andM. L. Dunn. 1980. Feeding strategies and patterns of movement in juvenile estuarine fishes, p. 437–448.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Perspectives. Academic Press, New York.
Minello, T. J. andL. P. Rozas. 2002. Nekton in gulf coast wetlands: Fine-scale distributions, landscape patterns, and restoration implications.Ecological Applications 12:441–455.
Minello, T. J., R. J. Zimmerman, andR. Medina. 1994. The importance of edge for natant macrofauna in a created saltmarsh.Wetlands 14:184–198.
Montgomery, J. L. M. andT. E. Targett. 1992. The nutritional role of seagrass in the diet of the omnivorous pinfishLagodon rhomboides (L.).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 158:37–57.
Novakowski, K. I., R. Torres, L. R. Gardner, and G. Voulgaris. 2004. Geomorphic analysis of tidal creek networks.Water Resources Resarch 40, W05401, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002722.
Ogburn-Matthews, M. V. andD. M. Allen. 1993. Interactions among some dominant estuarine nekton species.Estuaries 16: 840–850.
Ogburn, M. V., D. M. Allen, andW. K. Michener. 1988. Fishes, shrimps, and crabs of the North Inlet Estuary, SC: A four-year seine and trawl survey. Baruch Institute Technical Report. No. 88-1. University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Parrish, J. K. 1989. Layering with depth in a heterospecific fish aggregation.Environmental Biology of Fishes 26:79–85.
Paterson, A. W. andA. K. Whitfield. 2000. Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes?Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 51:359–364.
Peterson, G. W. andR. E. Turner. 1994. The value of salt marsh edge vs. interior as a habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh.Estuaries 17:235–262.
Posey, M. H. andA. H. Hines. 1991. Complex predator-prey interactions within an estuarine benthic community.Ecology 72: 2155–2169.
Potthoff, M. T. andD. M. Allen. 2003. Site fidelity, home range, and tidal migrations of juvenile pinfish,Lagodon rhomboides, in salt marsh creeks.Environmental Biology of Fishes 67:231–240.
Power, M. E. 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: Importance of stream depth and prey size, p. 333–351.In W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih (eds.), Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England. Hanover, New Hampshire.
Rogers, S. G., T. E. Targett, andS. B. Van Sant. 1984. Fishnursery use in Georgia salt-marsh estuaries: The influence of springtime freshwater conditions.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:595–606.
Rountree, R. A. andK. W. Able. 1992. Foraging habits, growth, and temporal patterns of salt-marsh creek habitat use by young-of-the-year summer flounder in New Jersey.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:765–776.
Rozas, L. P. 1992. Bottomless lift net for quantitatively sampling nekton on intertidal marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 89: 287–292.
Rozas, L. P. andM. W. Lasalle. 1990. A comparison of the diets of gulf killifish,Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard, entering and leaving a Mississippi brackish marsh.Estuaries 13:332–336.
Rozas, L. P., C. C. McIvor, andW. E. Odum. 1988. Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: Corridors between tidal creeks and marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 47:303–307.
Ruiz, G. M., A. H. Hines, andM. H. Posey. 1993. Shallow water as a refuge habitat for fish and crustaceans in non-vegetated estuaries: An example from Chesapeake Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 99:1–16.
Sogard, S. M. andK. W. Able. 1991. A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 33:501–519.
Stoner, A. W. 1980. Feeding ecology ofLagodon rhomboides (Pisces: Sparidae) variation and functional responses.Fisheries Bulletin 78:337–352.
Weinstein, M. P. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fishes and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina.Fisheries Bulletin 77:339–357.
Weinstein, M. P. andR. W. Davis. 1980. Collection efficiency of seine and rotenone samples from tidal creeks, Cape Fear River, North Carolina.Estuaries 3:98–105.
Weinstein, M. P., S. L. Weiss, andM. F. Walters. 1980. Multiple determinants of community structure in shallow marsh habitats, Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina, USA.Marine Biology 58:227–243.
Wenner, C. 1992. Red drum: Natural history and fishing techniques in South Carolina. Educational Report No. 17, South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Charleston, South Carolina.
Wenner, C. andJ. Archambault. 1996. Spotted seatrout: Natural history and fishing techniques in South Carolina. Educational Report No. 18, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, South Carolina.
Wenner, E., H. R. Beatty, andL. Coen. 1996. A method for quantitatively sampling nekton on intertidal oyster reefs.Journal of Shellfish Research 15:769–775.
West, J. M. andJ. B. Zedler. 2000. Marsh-creek connectivity: Fish use of a tidal salt marsh in southern California.Estuaries 23:699–710.
Wolfinger, R. D. 1999. Fitting nonlinear mixed models with the new NLMIXED procedure. SAS Users Group International Proceedings. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
Zimmerman, R. J., T. J. Minello, andJ. Zamora, Jr. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp,Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh.Fishery Bulletin 82:325–336.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bretsch, K., Allen, D.M. Tidal migrations of nekton in salt marsh intertidal creeks. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 29, 474–486 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784995
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784995