Abstract
Individualized care is a total system of care that is tailored to a child with severely maladjusted behavior. The services are unconditional, flexible, child and family focused, and interagency coordinated. The services follow the child until the child is adjusting in a normalized, mainstream environment. Individualized care is illustrated through two different projects. One is theAlaska Youth Initiative where individualized care was used to return children from out-of-state, residential programs. The other isProject Wraparound where it was used to prevent children from being removed from their families. This paper begins with the principles of individualized care and then describes the ecological, multilevel assessment process that coincides with the delivery of services. A case example from Project Wraparound is provided for clarification. Following the case example is a discussion of the need for evaluation data with some suggested strategies for documenting effectiveness. The final section focuses on two barriers to the implementation of individualized care. One is the tendency to think in terms of component programs rather than individualized services. The other barrier is the competition for scarce resources. Strategies are presented for overcoming both barriers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Swartz SL, Mosley WJ, Koenig-Jerz G: Diagnosing Behavior Disorders: An Analysis of State Definitions, Eligibility Criteria and Recommended Procedures. Conference Procedures. Council for Exceptional Children. Educational Resources Information Center, 1989.
Achenbach TM: Developmental Psychopathology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
Huntze SL: A position paper of the council for children with behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders 1985; 10:167–174.
Feldman D, Kinnison L, Tay R, Harth R: The effects of differential labeling on professional concept and attitudes toward the emotionally/behaviorally disordered. Behavior Disorders 1983; 8:191–198.
Knitzer J: Unclaimed Children; The Failure of Public Responsibility to Children and Adolescents in Need of Mental Health Services. Children’s Defense Fund, 1982.
CASSP. Update 1989; 4:16–19.
Stroul BA, Friedman RM: A System of Care for Severely Emotionally Disturbed Children and Youth. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center, 1986.
Individualizing services. Update, 1988.
Individualizing services. Update, 1988.
Burchard JD, Clarke RT: Individualized Approaches to Treatment: Project Wraparound. Conference Proceedings from the Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy Conference: Building a Research Base. Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, 1989.
Dowrick P: Alaska youth initiative. In: Greenbaum P, Friedman R, Duchnowski A, et al. Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy: Building a Research Base. Tampa, FL: Florida Mental Health Institute, 1988.
VanDenBerg J: Personal communication, 1989.
VanDenBerg J: Personal communication, 1989.
Barth RP: Social and Cognitive Treatment of Children and Adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
Hersen M, Barlow DH: Single-Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior. New York: Pergamon, 1976.
Wald MS: Family Preservation: Are We Moving Too Fast. We Need More Data on the Impact of Interventions with Children. Public Welfare, 1988.
Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C: Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 1983.
Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C: Manual for the Teacher Report Form. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 1986.
Magura S, Moses BS: Outcome Measures for Child Welfare Services: Theory and Applications. Child Welfare League of America, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burchard, J.D., Clarke, R.T. The role of individualized care in a service delivery system for children and adolescents with severely maladjusted behavior. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 17, 48–60 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518579
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518579