Abstract
This paper examines the form of mental representation of scientific theories in scientists and nonscientists. It concludes that images and schemas are not the appropriate form of mental representation for scientific theories but that mental models and perceptual symbols do seem appropriate for representing physical/mechanical phenomena. These forms of mental representation are postulated to have an analogical relation with the world and it is this relationship that gives them strong explanatory power. It is argued that the construct of naïve theories as used in developmental psychology may be the appropriate form of mental representation for non physical/mechanical domains. The paper adopts a strong form of psychologism in the philosophy of science and argues that model-based approaches to scientific theories are more appropriate forms of representation for scientific theories than the formalist approaches that dominate current philosophy of science.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J.R. & Bower, G.H. (1973)Human Associative Memory (Washington DC, V.H. Winston).
Andersson, B. (1986) The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils' preconceptions in science,European Journal of Science Education, 8, pp. 155–71.
Barsalou, L.W., Yeh, W., Luka, B.J., Olseth, K.L., Mix, K.S. & Wu, L.-L. (1993) Concepts and meaning,CLS 29 (Chicago Linguistic Society), 2 (The Parasession), pp. 23–61.
Barsalou, L.W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 577–609.
Bartlett, F.C. (1932)Remembering (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Bell, J. (1986) John Bell, in P.C.W. Davies & J.R. Brown (Eds)The Ghost in the Atom (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 45–57.
Bohm, D. (1986) David Bohm, in P.C.W. Davies & J.R. Brown (Eds),The Ghost in the Atom (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 118–34.
Boltzmann, L. (1886/1974) The second law of thermodynamics, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 13–32.
Boltzmann, L. (1892/1974) On the methods of theoretical physics, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 5–12.
Boltzmann, L. (1899/1974) On the development of the methods of theoretical physics in recent times, in B. McGuinness (Ed.),Ludwig Boltzmann: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems: Selected Writings (Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel), pp. 77–100.
Boltzmann, L. (1902) Models,The New Volumes of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10th edition, Vol. 30 (London, Adam and Charles Black), pp. 788–91
Brewer, W.F. (1999a) Perceptual symbols: The power and limitations of a theory of dynamic imagery and structured frames,Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 611–2.
Brewer, W.F. (1999b) Scientific theories and naive theories as forms of mental representation: Psychologism revived,Science & Education 8, pp. 489–505.
Brewer, W.F. (2000) Bartlett's concept of the schema and its impact on theories of knowledge representation in contemporary cognitive psychology, in A. Saito (Ed.),Bartlett, Culture and Cognition (Hove UK, Psychology Press), pp. 69–89.
Brewer, W.F. & Mishra, P. (1998) Science, in W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds),A Companion to cognitive Science (Oxford, Blackwell), pp. 744–9.
Brewer, W.F. & Nakamura, G.V. (1984) The nature and functions of schemas, in R.S. Wyer Jr. & T.K. Srull (Eds),Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1 (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 119–60.
Buchdahl, G. (1964) Theory construction: The work of Norman Robert Campbell,Isis, 55, pp. 151–2.
Campbell, N.R. (1913)Modern Electrical Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Campbell, N.R. (1920/1957)Foundations of Science (New York, Dover) (originally published asPhysics: The Elements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1920).
Carey, S. (1985)Conceptual Change in Childhood (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).
Clement, J. (2000) Model based learning as a key research area for science education,International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp. 1041–53.
Collins, A. (1985) Component models of physical systems, inProceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Irvine CA, pp. 80–9.
Collins, A.M. & Quillian, M.R. (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, pp. 240–7.
Craik, K.J.W. (1943)The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Cushing, J.T. (1991) Quantum theory and explanatory discourse: Endgame for understanding,Philosophy of Science, 58, pp. 337–58.
de Kleer, J. & Brown, J.S. (1981) Mental models of physical mechanisms and their acquisition, in J.R. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 285–309.
Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978) Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students,Studies in Science Education, 5, pp. 61–84.
Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (Eds) (1985)Children's Ideas in Science (Milton Keynes UK, Open University Press).
Duhem, P. (1914/1991)The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. by P.P. Wiener (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) (original work published 1914).
Eddington, A.S. (1928)The Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Einstein, A. (1959) Autobiographical notes, in P.A. Schilpp (Ed.),Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1 (New York, Harper), pp. 2–95.
Feynman, R.P. (1985) “Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!” (New York, Norton).
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B. & Sands, M. (1964)The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 2:Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter (Reading MA, Addison-Wesley).
Gentner, D. & Stevens, A.L. (Eds.) (1983)Mental Models (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum).
Gholson, B., Shadish, W.R. Jr., Neimeyer, R.A. & Houts, A.C. (Eds.) (1989)Psychology of Science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Giere, R.N. (1992)Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15 (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).
Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C.J. (1998) Learning science through models and modelling, in B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.),International Handbook of Science Education, Vol. 1 (Dordrecht, Holland, Kluwer), pp. 53–66.
Gobert, J.D. & Buckley, B.C. (2000) Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education,International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp. 891–4.
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A.N. (1997)Words Thoughts, and Theories (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).
Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H.M. (1992) Why the child's theory of mind reallyis a theory,Mind & Language, 7, pp. 145–71.
Hempel, C.G. (1966)Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice-Hall).
Hesse, M. (1967) Models and analogy in science, in P. Edwards (Ed.),Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5 (New York, Macmillan), pp. 354–9.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980) Mental models in cognitive science,Cognitive Science, 4, pp. 71–115.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983)Mental Models (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).
Karmiloff-Smith, A. & Inhelder, B. (1975) “If you want to get ahead, get a theory”,Cognition, 3, pp. 195–212.
Klein, M.J. (1972) Mechanical explanation at the end of the nineteenth century,Centaurus, 17, pp. 58–82.
Leatherdale, W.H. (1974)The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science (Amsterdam, North-Holland).
Maxwell, J.C. (1890) Address to the mathematical and physical sections of the British Association, in W.D. Niven (Ed.),The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 215–29.
McAllister, J.W. (1996)Beauty & Revolution in Science (Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press).
McMullin, E. (1968) What do physical models tell us?, in B. van Rootselaar & J.F. Staal (Eds),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III (Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam 1967) (Amsterdam, North-Holland), pp. 385–96.
Mellor, D.H. (1968) Models and analogies in science: Duhemversus Campbell?Isis, 59, pp. 282–90.
Nagel, E. (1961)The Structure of Science (New York, Harcourt, Brace and World).
Nash, L.K. (1963)The Nature of the Natural Sciences (Boston, Little, Brown).
Nussbaum, J. & Novick, S. (1982) Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy,Instructional Science, 11, pp. 183–200.
Perner, J. (1991)Understanding the Representational Mind (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).
Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1991)Bibliography: Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 3rd ed. (Kiel, Germany, Institute for Science Education, University of Kiel).
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change,Science Education, 66, pp. 211–27.
Reiner, M., Chi, M.T.H. & Resnick, L. (1988) Naive materialistic belief: An underlying epistemological commitment. inProceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 544–51.
Root-Bernstein, R.S. (1985) Visual thinking: The art of imagining reality,Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 75 (Part 6), pp. 50–67.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition, in R.J. Spiro & B.C. Bruce and W.F. Brewer (Eds)Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 33–58.
Schwitzgebel, E. (1999) Children's theories and the drive to explain,Science & Education, 8, pp. 457–88.
Shepard, R.N. (1978) Externalization of mental images and the act of creation, in B.S. Randhawa & W.E. Coffman (Eds.),Visual Learning, Thinking, and Communication, (New York, Academic Press), pp. 133–89.
Stevens, A.L. & Gentner, D. (1983) Introduction, in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds),Mental Models (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 1–6.
Suppe, F. (Ed.) (1977),The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. (Urbana IL, University of Illinois Press).
Thomson, J.J. (1930)Tendencies of Recent Investigations in the Field of Physics (London, British Broadcasting Corporation).
Thomson, W. (Lord Kelvin) (1884)Lectures on Molecular Dynamics (Baltimore MD, Johns Hopkins University).
Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F. (1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle,Cognitive Science, 18, pp. 123–83.
Wellman, H.M. (1990)The Child's Theory of Mind (Cambridge MA, TheMit Press).
Williams, M.D., Hollan, J.D. & Stevens, A.L. (1983) Human reasoning about a simple physical system, in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental Models, (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 131–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewer, W.F. Models in science and mental models in scientists and nonscientists. Mind & Society 2, 33–48 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512358
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512358