Summary
Complete or partial nucleotide sequences of five different rRNA species, coded by nuclear (18S, 5.8S, and 5S) or chloroplast genomes (5S, 4.5S) from a number of seed plants were determined. Based on the sequence data, the phylogenetic dendrograms were built by two methods, maximum parsimony and compatibility. The topologies of the trees for different rRNA species are not fully congruent, but they share some common features. It may be concluded that both gymnosperms and angiosperms are monophyletic groups. The data obtained suggest that the divergence of all the main groups of extant gymnosperms occurred after the branching off of the angiosperm lineage. As the time of divergence of at least some of these gymnosperm taxa is traceable back to the early Carboniferous, it may be concluded that the genealogical splitting of gymnosperm and angiosperm lineages occurred before this event, at least 360 million years ago, i.e., much earlier than the first angiosperm fossils were dated. Ancestral forms of angiosperms ought to be searched for among Progymnospermopsida. Genealogical relationships among gymnosperm taxa cannot be deduced unambiguously on the basis of rRNA data. The only inference may be that the taxon Gnetopsida is an artificial one, andGnetum andEphedra belong to quite different lineages of gymnosperms. As to the phylogenetic position of the two Angiospermae classes, extant monocotyledons seem to be a paraphyletic group located near the root of the angiosperm branch; it emerged at the earliest stages of angiosperm evolution. We may conclude that either monocotyledonous characters arose independently more than once in different groups of ancient Magnoliales or that monocotyledonous forms rather than dicotyledonous Magnoliales were the earliest angiosperms. Judging by the rRNA trees, Magnoliales are the most ancient group among dicotyledons. The most ancient lineage among monocotyledons leads to modern Liliaceae.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Antonov AS, Troitsky AV (1986) The results of investigation of evolution of plant rRNA evoke doubt in universal fitness of the “molecular clock” hypothesis. J Evol Biochem Physiol 22:343–350 [in Russian]
Archie JW (1989) Phylogenies of plant families: a demonstration of phylogenetic randomness in DNA sequence data derived from proteins. Evolution 43:1796–1800.
Axelrod DI (1970) Mesozoic paleogeography and early angiosperm history. Bot Rev 36:277–319
Beck CB (ed) (1976) Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia University Press, New York
Beck CB (ed) (1988) Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia University Press, New York
Bobrova VK, Troitsky AV, Ponomarev AG, Antonov AS (1987) Low-molecular-weight rRNAs sequences and plant phylogeny reconstruction: nucleotide sequences of chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs fromAcorus calamus (Araceae) andLigularia calthifolia (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 156:13–27
Britten RJ (1986) Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231:39–44
Burger WC (1981) Heresy revived: the monocot theory of angiosperm origin. Evol Theory 5:189–225
Cheng Z-Q, Zhang H, Li G-Y (1986) The nucleotide sequences of chloroplast 4.5S rRNAs from four species of plants, celery (Apium graveoleus), barley (Hordeum vulgare), Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum), and dayflower (Commelina communis). FEBS Lett 200:193–196
Crane PR (1985) Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 72:716–793
Dahlgren R, Rasmussen FN (1983) Monocotyledon evolution. Characters and phylogenetic estimation. Evol Biol 16:255–395
Dams E, Hendriks L, Van de Peer Y, Neefs J-M, Smits G, Vandenbempt I, De Wachter R (1988) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 16S:r87-r173
Doyle JA (1978) Origin of angiosperms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:369–392
Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ (1987) The importance of fossils in elucidating seed plant phylogeny and macroevolution. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 50:63–95
Erdmann VA, Wolters J (1986) Collection of published 5S, 5.8S and 4.5S ribosomal RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 14S:r1-r59
Estabrook GF (1983) The causes of character incompatibility. In: Felsenstein J (ed) Numerical taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol G1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 279–295
Estabrook GF, McMorris FR (1980) When is one estimate of evolutionary relationships a refinement of another? J Math Biol 10:367–373
Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package, Version 3.2
Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416
Gillespie JH (1986) Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA. Genetics 113:1077–1091
Goodman M (1981) Decoding the pattern of protein evolution. Progr Biophys Mol Biol 37:105–164
Kavanagh TA, Timmis JN (1988) Structure of melon rDNA and nucleotide sequence of the 17–25S spacer region. Theor Appl Genet 76:673–680
Kiss T, Kis M, Abel S, Solymosy F (1988) Nucleotide sequence of the 17S–25S spacer region from tomato rDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 16:7179
Krassilov VA (1989) Origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Nauka, Moscow [in Russian]
Le Quesne WJ (1983) The uniquely derived concept as a basis for character compatibility analyses. In: Felsenstein J (ed) Numerical taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol G1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 296–303
Liang HQ, Bernard M, Bachellerie J-P (1983) Improved method for structure probing in large RNAs: a rapid heterologous sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application of eukaryotic 28S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 11:5903–5920
Martin PG, Dowd JM (1986) A phylogenetic tree for some monocotyledons and gymnosperms derived from protein sequences. Taxon 35:469–475
Martin PG, Boulter D, Penny D (1985) Angiosperm phylogeny studied using sequences of five macromolecules. Taxon 34:393–400
Martin W, Gierl A, Saedler H (1989) Molecular evidence for pre-Cretaceous angiosperm origin. Nature 339:46–48
Melekhovets YuF, Troitsky AV (1990) Comparative analysis of 5.8S rRNA fromEphedra kokanica Regl. (Gymnospermae) and other plant species. Biochim Biophys Acta 1048:294–296
Melekhovets YuF, Troitsky AV, Valiejo-Roman KM, Bobrova VK, Antonov AS (1988) Nucleotide sequences of cytosolic 5S ribosomal RNAs from two gymnosperms,Gnetum gnemon andEphedra kokanica. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4155
Meyen SV (1984) Basic features of gymnosperm systematics and phylogeny as evidenced by the fossil record. Bot Rev 50:1–111
Nairn CJ, Ferl RJ (1988) The complete nucleotide sequence of the small-subunit ribosomal RNA coding region for the cycadZamia pumila: phylogenetic implications. J Mol Evol 27:133–141
Nazar RN, McDougall J, Van Ryk DI (1987) Structure and evolution of the 4.5–5S ribosomal RNA intergenic region fromGlycine max (soya bean). Nucleic Acids Res 15:7593–7603
Omelyanchuk LV, Kolchanov NA (1985) Algorithm for additive tree building from sets of homologous sequences. Veracity of phylogenetic reconstructions In: Algorithmic analysis of structural information (Computer Systems), no 112. IM SO AN SSSR Novosibirsk, pp 46–55 [in Russian]
Peattie DA (1979) Direct chemical method of sequencing RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1760–1764
Rakhimova GM, Troitsky AV, Klikunova IN, Antonov AS (1989) Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA partial sequences from 14 higher plant species. Mol Biol 23:830–842 [in Russian]
Schiebel K, Hemleben V (1989) Nucleotide sequence of the 18S–25S spacer region from rDNA of mung bean. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2852
Schuster W, Brennicke A (1987) Plastid DNA in the mitochondrial genome ofOenothera: intra- and interorganelle rearrangements involving part of the plastid ribosomal cistron. Mol Gen Genet 210:44–51
Takhtajan AL (1969) Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Smithsonian, Washington, DC
Troitsky AV, Bobrova VK, Ponomarev AG, Antonov AS (1984) The nucleotide sequence of chloroplast 4.5S rRNA fromMnium rugicum (Bryophyta): mosses also possess this type of RNA. FEBS Lett 176:105–109
Troitsky AV, Bobrova VK, Melekhovets YuF, Valiejo-Roman KM (1989a) The nucleotide sequence of 5.8S rRNA from the mossMnium rugicum Laur. Nucleic Acids Res 17:459
Troitsky AV, Valiejo-Roman KM, Melekhovets YuF, Bobrova VK, Omelyanchuk LV, Antonov AS (1989b) Higher plant phylogeny reconstruction based on chloroplast 4.5S and 5S rRNAs. Nucleotide sequences in 4.5S rRNAs from five plant species. J Evol Biochem Physiol 25:167–175 [in Russian]
Wolfe KH, Gouy M, Yang Y-W, Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) Date of the monocot-dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6201–6205
Wolters J, Erdmann VA (1988) Compilation of 5S rRNA and 5S rRNA gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 16S:r1-r70
Zharkikh AA, Rzhetsky AYu, Morosov PS, Sitnikova TL, Krushkal JS, Matushkin YuG (1990) VOSTORG: package of microcomputer programs of phylogenetic analysis. In: Modelling and computer methods in molecular biology and genetics. Abstracts of the International Conference, Novosibirsk, pp 217–218
Zhou X, Liu W, Wang M (1988) Comparative study on the evolution of chloroplast ribosomal 5S RNA of a living fossil plant,Cycas revoluta Thunb. FEBS Lett 235:30–34
Zimmer EA, Hamby RK, Arnold ML, Leblanc DA, Theriot EC (1989) Ribosomal RNA phylogenies and flowering plant evolution. In: Fernholn B, Bremer K, Jörnvall H (eds) The hierarchy of life. Elsevier Science Publishers BV (Biomedical Division), Amsterdam, pp 205–214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Troitsky, A.V., Melekhovets, Y.F., Rakhimova, G.M. et al. Angiosperm origin and early stages of seed plant evolution deduced from rRNA sequence comparisons. J Mol Evol 32, 253–261 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342748
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342748