Abstract
Cureton & Mulaik (1975) proposed the Weighted Varimax rotation so that Varimax (Kaiser, 1958) could reach simple solutions when the complexities of the variables in the solution are larger than one. In the present paper the weighting procedure proposed by Cureton & Mulaik (1975) is applied to Direct Oblimin (Clarkson & Jennrich, 1988), and the rotation method obtained is called Weighted Oblimin. It has been tested on artificial complex data and real data, and the results seem to indicate that, even though Direct Oblimin rotation fails when applied to complex data, Weighted Oblimin gives good results if a variable with complexity one can be found for each factor in the pattern. Although the weighting procedure proposed by Cureton & Mulaik is based on Landahl's (1938) expression for orthogonal factors, Weighted Oblimin seems to be adequate even with highly oblique factors. The new rotation method was compared to other rotation methods based on the same weighting procedure and, whenever a variable with complexity one could be found for each factor in the pattern, Weighted Oblimin gave the best results. When rotating a simple empirical loading matrix, Weighted Oblimin seemed to slightly increase the performance of Direct Oblimin.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bentler, P.M. (1977). Factor simplicity index and transformations.Psychometrika, 42, 277–295.
Browne, M.W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207–212.
Browne, M.W., & Du Toit, S.H.C. (1992) Automated fitting of nonstandard models.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 269–300.
Clarkson, D.B., & Jennrich, R.I. (1988). Quartic rotation criteria and algorithms.Psychometrika, 53, 251–259.
Crawford, C. (1975). A comparison of the direct oblimin and primary parsimony methods of oblique rotation.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 201–213.
Cureton, E.E., & Mulaik, S. (1975). The weighted varimax rotation and the promax rotation.Psychometrika, 40, 183–195.
Harris, C.W., & Kaiser, H.F. (1964). Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations.Psychometrika, 29, 347–362.
Hendrickson, A.E., & White, P.O. (1964). PROMAX: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70.
Jennrich, R.I. (1979). Admissible values of gamma in direct oblimin rotation.Psychometrika, 44, 173–177.
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.
Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Simplimax: oblique rotation to an optimal target with simple structure.Psychometrika, 59, 567–579.
Landahl, H.D. (1938). Centroid orthogonal transformations.Psychometrika, 3, 219–223.
Lorenzo-Seva, U. (1999). Promin: a method for oblique factor rotation.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 347–356.
The MathWorks (1984).Matlab. Natick. MA: Author.
Meredith, W. (1977). On weighted Procrustes and hyperplane fitting in factor analytic rotation.Psychometrika, 42, 491–522.
Stankov, L., Roberts, R., & Spilsbury, G. (1994). Attention and speed of test-taking in intelligence and aging.Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 273–284.
ten Berge, J.M.F.T. (1995). Suppressing permutations or rigid planar rotations: A remedy against nonoptimal varimax rotations.Psychometrika, 60, 437–446.
Thurstone, L.L. (1947).Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Trendafilov, N. (1994). A simple method for procrustean rotation in factor analysis using majorization theory.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 385–408.
Tucker, L.R. (1951). Common factor analysis versus principal components analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263–311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author is obliged to Henk A. L. Kiers and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenzo-Seva, U. The weighted oblimin rotation. Psychometrika 65, 301–318 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296148
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296148