Abstract
Tversky's contrast model of proximity was initially formulated to account for the observed violations of the metric axioms often found in empirical proximity data. This set-theoretic approach models the similarity/dissimilarity between any two stimuli as a linear (or ratio) combination of measures of the common and distinctive features of the two stimuli. This paper proposes a new spatial multidimensional scaling (MDS) procedure called TSCALE based on Tversky's linear contrast model for the analysis of generally asymmetric three-way, two-mode proximity data. We first review the basic structure of Tversky's conceptual contrast model. A brief discussion of alternative MDS procedures to accommodate asymmetric proximity data is also provided. The technical details of the TSCALE procedure are given, as well as the program options that allow for the estimation of a number of different model specifications. The nonlinear estimation framework is discussed, as are the results of a modest Monte Carlo analysis. Two consumer psychology applications are provided: one involving perceptions of fast-food restaurants and the other regarding perceptions of various competitive brands of cola soft-drinks. Finally, other applications and directions for future research are mentioned.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 231–309). New York: Academic Press.
Addelman, S. (1962). Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments.Technometrics, 4, 21–46.
Bennett, J. F., & Hays, W. L. (1960). Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data.Psychometrika, 25, 27–43.
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1978). Restricted multidimensional scaling models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 138–151.
Bettman, J. R. (1986). Consumer psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 257–289.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis.Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bloxom, B. (1978). Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces.Psychometrika, 43, 397–408.
Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.Psychological Review, 58, 413–423.
Carroll, J. D. (1980). Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance) data. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.),Similarity and Choice (pp. 234–289). Bern: Huber.
Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S., & Kruskal, J. B. (1980). CANDELINC: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters.Psychometrika, 45, 3–24.
Chino, N. (1978). A graphical technique for representing the asymmetric relationship betweenN objects.Behaviormetrika, 5, 23–40.
Chino, N. (1979). Extension of Chino's ASYMSCAL into higher dimensions.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 7th Behaviormetric Society of Japan, Japan.
Chino, N. (1990). A generalized inner product model for the analysis of asymmetry.Behaviormetrika, 27, 25–46.
Constantine, A. G., & Gower, J. C. (1978). Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices.Applied Statistics, 27, 297–304.
Coombs, C. H. (1950). Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.Psychological Review, 57, 148–158.
Corter, J. E., & Tversky, A. (1986). Extended similarity trees.Psychometrika, 51, 429–451.
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.
de Leeuw, J., & Heiser, W. (1980). Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis-V (pp. 501–522). New York: North-Holland.
DeSarbo, W. S. (1982). GENNCLUS: New models for general nonhierarchical cluster analysis.Psychometrika, 47, 446–469.
DeSarbo, W. S., & Carroll, J. D. (1985). Three-way metric unfolding via weighted alternating least squares.Psychometrika, 50, 275–300.
DeSarbo, W. S., Carroll, J. D., Lehmann, D., & O'Shaugnessy, J. (1982). Three-way multivariate conjoint analysis.Marketing Science, 1, 323–350.
DeSarbo, W. S., & Manrai, A. K. (in press). A new multidimensional scaling methodology for the analysis of asymmetric proximity data in marketing research.Marketing Science.
DeSarbo, W. S., Manrai, A. K., & Burke, R. R. (1990). A nonspatial methodology for the analysis of two-way proximity data incorporating the distance-density hypothesis.Psychometrika, 55, 229–253.
DeSarbo, W. S., & Rao, V. R. (1984). GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the GENeral unFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data.Journal of Classification, 1, 147–186.
DeSarbo, W. S., & Rao, V. R. (1986). A constrained unfolding methodology for product positioning.Marketing Science, 5, 1–19.
Doyle, P., & Hutchinson, P. (1973). Individual differences in family decision making.Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 15, 193–206.
Einhorn, H. J., Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Kleinmuntz, B. (1979). Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment.Psychological Review, 86, 465–485.
Eisler, H., & Ekman, G. (1959). A mechanism of subjective similarity.Acta Psychologica, 16, 1–10.
Garner, W. R. (1978). Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 99–133). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1982). Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 325–340.
Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1984). Weighting common and distinctive features in perceptual and conceptual judgments.Cognitive Psychology, 16, 341–370.
Gentry, J. W., Doering, M., & O'Brien, T. V. (1978). Masculinity and femininity factors in product perception and self image. In H. Keith Hunt (Ed.),Advances in consumer research (pp. 326–332). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (1981).Practical optimization. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Gower J. C. (1978). Unfolding: Some technical problems and novel uses.Presented at European meeting of Psychometric and Mathematical Psychology, Uppsala.
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data.Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355–363.
Gregson, R. A. M. (1975).Psychometrics of similarity. New York: Academic Press.
Harshman, R. A. (1975). Models for the analysis of asymmetrical relationships amongN objects or stimuli.Presented at US-Japan seminar on multidimensional scaling, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Hartigan, J. A. (1975).Clustering algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Himmelblau, D. M. (1972).Applied nonlinear programming. New York, McGraw Hill.
Holman, E. W. (1979). Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 20, 1–15.
Howard, J. (1977).Consumer behavior: Application of theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information.Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542–550.
Johnson, M. D. (1986). Consumer similarity judgments: A test of the contrast model.Psychology and Marketing, 3, 47–60.
Johnson, M. D., & Fornell, C. (1987). The nature and methodological implications of the cognitive representation of products.Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 214–228.
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes.Psychometrika, 32, 241–254.
Krumhansl, C. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density.Psychological Review, 85, 445–463.
Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B. (1973).How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1972).Solving least squares problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lopes, L. L., & Johnson, M. D. (1982). Judging similarity among strings described by hierarchical trees.Acta Psychologica, 51, 13–26.
Manrai, A. K. (1986).Similarity, perceptions, and choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Manrai, A. K. & Manrai, L. A. (1989). Mathematical models for relating proximity to multidimensional scaling. In N. Avlonitis (Ed.),Marketing thought and practice in the 1990's (pp. 853–868). Athens, Greece: European Marketing Academy, The Athens School of Economics and Business Science.
Manrai, A. K., & Sinha, P. K. (1989). Elimination by cutoffs.Marketing Science, 8, 133–152.
Meyers-Levy, J. (1988). The influence of sex roles on judgment.Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 522–530.
Nakatani, L. H. (1972). Confusion-choice model for multidimensional psychophysics.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 104–127.
Noma, E., & Johnson, J. (1977).Constraining nonmetric multidimensional scaling configurations (Tech. Rep. 60). The University of Michigan, Human Performance Center, Ann Arbor.
Okada, A., & Imaizumi, T. (1987). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities.Behaviormetrika, 21, 81–96.
Prinz, W., & Scheerer-Neumann, G. (1974). Component processes in multiattribute stimulus classification.Psychological Research, 37, 25–50.
Powell, M. J. D. (1977). Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method.Mathematical Programming, 12, 241–254.
Pruzansky, S., Tversky, A., & Carroll, J. D. (1982). Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data.Psychometrika, 47, 3–24.
Rao, S. S. (1984).Optimization: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Restle, F. A. (1959). A metric and an ordering on sets.Psychometrika, 24, 207–220.
Restle, F. A. (1961).Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–603.
Saito, T. (1986). Multidimensional scaling to explore complex aspects in dissimilarity judgment.Behaviormetrika, 20, 35–62.
Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees.Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.
Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1987). On the relation between common and distinctive feature models.Psychological Review, 94, 16–22.
Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I.Psychometrika, 27, 125–140.
Shepard, R. N., & Arabie, P. (1979). Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties.Psychological Review, 86, 87–123.
Shor, N. Z. (1979).Minimization methods for non-differentiable functions. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sjöberg, L. (1972).A cognitive theory of similarity. Goteborg Psychological Reports (No. 10).
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review, 81, 214–241.
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least square method with optimal scaling features.Psychometrika, 42, 7–67.
Turle, J. E., & Falconer, R. (1972). Men and women are different.Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 14, 111–123.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice.Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 79–98). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality.Psychological Review, 89, 123–154.
Tversky, A., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1986). Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces.Psychological Review, 93, 3–22.
Young, F. W. (1975). An asymmetric Euclidean model for multiprocess asymmetric data.Presented at US-Japan seminar on multidimensional scaling, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to acknowledge the reviews of prior versions of this manuscript by three anonymous reviewers and the editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeSarbo, W.S., Johnson, M.D., Manrai, A.K. et al. Tscale: A new multidimensional scaling procedure based on tversky's contrast model. Psychometrika 57, 43–69 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294658
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294658