Abstract
Note is taken of four related sources of confusion as to the usefulness of Thurstone's factor analysis model and of their resolutions. One resolution uses Tucker's distinction between exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Eight analyses of two sets of data demonstrate the procedures and results of a confirmatory study with statistical tests of some, but not all, relevant hypotheses in an investigation of the stability (invariance) hypothesis. The empirical results provide estimates, as substitutes for unavailable sampling formulations, of effects of variation in diagonal values, in method of factoring, and in samples of cases. Implications of these results are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, T. W.Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. InProceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Vol. 5. Berkeley: Univ. California Press, 1956. Pp. 111–150.
Bargmann, R. Signifikanzuntersuchungen der einfachen struktur in der faktorenanalyse.Sonderdruck, Mit. d. Math. Stat., Physica-Verlag, Wurzburg, 1954.
Bargmann, R. A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 186, 1957.
Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sec., 1950,3, 77–85.
Bechtoldt, H. P. Factor analysis of the Airman Classification Battery with civilian reference tests.HRRC res. Bull., 1953, 53–59.
Bechtoldt, H. P. Statistical tests of hypotheses in confirmatory factor analysis.Amer. Psychologist, 1958,13, 380. (Abstract)
Bechtoldt, H. P. Construct validity: a critique.Amer. Psychologist, 1959,14, 619–629.
Bechtoldt, H. P. Comments on “Intraclass correlation vs. factor analytic techniques for determining groups of profiles.”Psychol.Bull., 1960,57, 157–162.
Bechtoldt, H. P. and Moren, R. I. Correlational analyses of test-retest data with a thirty-year intertrial interval.Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 1957,64, 514–519.
Bergmann, G. The logic of psychological concepts.Phil. Sci., 1951,18, 93–110.
Bergmann, G.Philosophy of science. Madison: Univ. Wisconsin Press, 1957.
Brodbeck, M. The philosophy of science and educational research.Rev. educ. Res., 1957,27, 427–440.
Brodbeck, M. Models, meaning, and theories. In L. Gross (Ed.),Symposium on sociological theory. Evanston: Row Peterson, 1958.
Burt, C. L. Tests of significance in factor analysis.Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sec., 1952,5, 109–133.
Carroll, J. B. An analytic solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1953,18, 23–38.
Cattell, R. B. Extracting the correct number of factors in factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 791–840.
Cureton, E. E. The principal compulsions of factor-analysts.Harvard educ. Rev., 1939,9, 287–295.
Cureton, E. E. A note on the use of Burt's formula for estimating factor significance.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1955,8, 28.
Dahlstrom, W. G. Research in clinical psychology: factor analytic contributions.J. clin. Psychol., 1957,13, 211–220.
Eysenck, H. J. The logical basis of factor analysis.Amer. Psychologist, 1953,8, 105–114.
Federer, W. T. Testing proportionality of covariance matrices.Ann. math. Statist., 1951,22, 102–106.
French, J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors.Psychometric Monogr. No.5. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1951.
French, J. W. Manual for kit of selected tests for reference aptitude and achievement factors. Princeton: Educ. Testing Serv., 1954.
Guilford, J. P.Psychometric methods. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
Guilford, J. P. Three faces of intellect.Amer. Psychologist, 1959,14, 469–479.
Gulliksen, H.Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley, 1950.
Gulliksen, H. and Wilks, S. S. Regression tests for several samples.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 91–114.
Guttman, L. General theory and methods for matrix factoring.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 1–16.
Guttman, L. Multiple group methods for common factor analysis: their basis, computation, and interpretation.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 209–222.
Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–285.
Guttman, L. What lies ahead for factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 497–515.
Guttman, L. To what extent can communalities reduce rank?Psychometrika, 1958,23, 297–308.
Henrysson, S.Applicability of factor analysis in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1957.
Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H.Factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.
Howe, W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL No. 1919, 1955.
Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1960,20, 141–151.
Koopmans, T. C. and Reiersöl, O. The identification of structural characteristics.Ann. math. Statist., 1950,21, 165–181.
Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proc. roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1940,60, 64–82.
Madansky, A. The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error.J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1959,54, 173–205.
Maxwell, A. E. Statistical methods in factor analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1959,56, 228–235.
Michael, W. B. Symposium: The future of factor analysis. An over-view of the symposium.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 455–461.
McNemar, Q. On the sampling errors of factor loadings.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 141–152.
Peel, E. A. Factorial analysis as a psychological technique.Uppsala Symp. on Psychol. Factor Analysis, 1953, 7–22.
Pinzka, C. and Saunders, D. R. Analytical rotation to simple structure II. Extension to oblique solution. Princeton: Educ. Test Serv., 1954.
Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.
Rasch, G. On simultaneous factor analysis in several populations.Uppsala Symp. on Psychol. Factor Analysis, 1953, 65–71.
Reiersöl, O. On the identifiability of parameters in Thurstone's multiple-factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 121–149.
Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 53–61.
Stukát, K. G.Suggestibility: a factorial and experimental analysis. (Acta Psychologica Gothoburgensia, II) Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1958.
Thomson, G.The factorial analysis of human ability. (5th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
Thurstone, L. L.The vectors of mind. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1935.
Thurstone, L. L. Current misuse of the factorial methods.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 73–76.
Thurstone, L. L. Current issues in factor analysis.Psychol. Bull., 1940,37, 189–236.
Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.
Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G. Factorial studies of intelligence.Psychometric Monogr. No.2. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.
Thurstone, L. L. and Thurstone, T. G.Primary mental abilities (manual and tests). Chicago: Sci. Res. Assoc., 1950.
Tryon, R. C. Communality of a variable: formulation by cluster analysis.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 241–259.
Tryon, R. C. General dimensions of individual differences: cluster analysis vs. multiple factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 477–495.
Tryon, R. C. Domain sampling formulation of cluster and factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 113–135.
Tucker, L. R. The role of correlated factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 141–152.
Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. PRS Report No. 984. Dept. Army: AGO, Personnel Res. Sec., Washington, D. C., 1951.
Tucker, L. R. The objective definition of simple structure in linear factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 209–225.
Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 111–136.
Wherry, R. J. Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 45–51.
Wrigley, C. Objectivity in factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958,18, 463–476.
Wrigley, C. The effect upon the communalities of changing the estimate of the number of factors.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1959,12, 35–51.
Young, G. and Householder, A. S. Factorial invariance and significance.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 47–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The computational costs of this study were defrayed, in part, by a research small grant M-1922 from the National Institute of Health, and, in part, by support under project 176-0002 by the University of Iowa Computing Center, Dr. J. P. Dolch, Director. The assistance of Dr. Kern Dickman and Mr. Leonard Wevrick of the University of Illinois and of Mr. Norman Luther of the University of Iowa in handling the computing problems is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bechtoldt, H.P. An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis. Psychometrika 26, 405–432 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289771
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289771