Abstract
PURPOSE: The influence of both blood flow and anastomotic technique on the development of anastomotic stricture formation was studied using a dog model. METHODS: Fifty-three dogs underwent distal colocolonic anastomosis with either an EEATM (U. S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT) circular stapler or a Czerny-Lembert two-layered, handsewn anastomosis. Blood flow was measured by Laser Doppler Velocimetry using the Laserflo BPM2 TM (Vasamedics Inc., St. Paul, MN). The animals were separated into three blood flow groups: greater than or equal to 62.5 percent of normal blood flow, between 37.5 percent and 62.5 percent of normal blood flow, and less than or equal to 37.5 percent of normal blood flow. Each blood flow group had an anastomosis performed by either stapling or by hand sewing techniques. At six weeks, the anastomoses were opened longitudinally and fixed to determine the anastomotic index (AI). AI is defined as two times the anastomotic circumference over the proximal circumference plus the distal circumference. Blood flow groups and anastomotic technique groups were compared with an interaction variable for the outcome, AI using a two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The AI of the stapled anastomoses was found to be significantly higher than handsewn anastomoses (P<0.006). There was no difference in AI between different blood flow groups and no correlation of observed histologic findings with AI. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant ischemia does not directly influence stricture formation in either handsewn or stapled distal colonic anastomoses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blarney SL, Lee PW. A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.
Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses—a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 1982;69:722–4.
Brown AA, Gasson JE, Brown RA. Experience with the EEA stapler in carcinoma of the lower rectum. S Afr Med J 1981;21:258–61.
Cade D, Gallagher P, Schofield PF, Turner L. Complications of anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling device. Br J Surg 1981;68:339–40.
Fain AN, Patin CS, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975;110:1079–82.
Gordon PH, Vasilevsky CA. Experience with stapling in rectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1984;64:555–66.
Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.
Heald RJ, Leichester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 1981;68:333–7.
Helm W, Rowe PH. Rectal anastomosis with the EEA stapling instrument. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1982;64:356–7.
Kennedy HL, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM,et al. Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:145–8.
Kirkegaard P, Christiansen J, Hjortrup A. Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument. Am J Surg 1980;140:312–4.
Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE. The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985;67:20–2.
Leff EI, Hoexter B, Labow SB, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. The EEA stapler in low colorectal anastomoses: initial experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:704–7.
Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surreil JA, Mazier WP. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:733–6.
Polglase AL, Cunningham GE, Hughes ES, Masterton JP. Initial clinical experience with the EEA stapler. Aust N Z J Surg 1982;52:71–5.
Shahinlan TK, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, Soderberg CH, Thompson WR. Experience with the EEA stapling device. Am J Surg 1980;139:549–53.
Smith LE. Anastomosis with the EEA stapler after anterior colon resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–42.
Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL. Anastomosis to the rectum: operative experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:105–9.
Vezeridis M, Evans JT, Mittelman A, Ledesma EJ. EEA stapler in low anterior anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:364–7.
Ballantyne GH. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing: effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:61–71.
Chung RS. Blood flow in colonic anastomoses: effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 1987;206:335–9.
Koruda MJ, Rolandelli RH. Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res 1990;48:504–15.
Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, Dunstan R, Mazier WP, Chaudry IH. Intramural pH: a quantitative measurement for predicting colorectal anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:175–9.
Shandall A, Lowndes R, Young HL. Colonic anastomotic healing and oxygen tension. Br J Surg 1985;72:606–9.
DeHaan BB, Ellis H, Wilks M. The role of infection of wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:693–700.
Dunphy JE. The cut gut. Am J Surg 1970;119:1–8.
Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Pathogenesis and prevention of disruption of colonic anastomoses in traumatized rats. Br J Surg 1974;61:437–9.
LeVeen HH, Wapnick S, Falk G,et al. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on colonic healing. Am J Surg 1976;131:47–53.
Houck JC. The effect of local necrosis upon the collagen content of uninjured distal skin. Surgery 1962;51:770–3.
Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK,et al. Does a proximal colostomy affect colorectal anastomotic healing? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:182–8.
Yamane T, Takahashi T, Okuzumi J,et al. Anastomotic stricture with the EEA stapler after colorectal operation in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:41–5.
Polglase AL, Hughes ES, McDermott FT,et al. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:792–6.
Dziki AJ, Duncan MD, Harmon JW,et al. Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:442–8.
Letwin E, Williams HT, Harrison RC. The experimental healing of soft tissues. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1966;12:121–32.
Ahn H, Lindhagen J, Nilsson GE, Salerud EG, Jodal M, Lundgren O. Evaluation of laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of intestinal blood flow in cat. Gastroenterology 1985;88:951–7.
Lynch TG, Hobson RW, Kerr JC,et al. Doppler ultrasound, laser Doppler, and perfusion fluorometry in bowel ischemia. Arch Surg 1988;123:483–6.
Shepherd AP, Riedel GL. Continuous measurement of intestinal mucosal blood flow by laser-Doppler velocimetry. Am J Physiol 1982;242:G668–72.
Shepherd AP, Riedel GL, Kiel JW,et al. Evaluation of an infrared laser-Doppler blood flowmeter. Am J Physiol 1987;252:G832–9.
Robbins SL, Cotran RS, Kumar V, eds. Pathologic basis of disease, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984: 73–4, 79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Research Foundation.
Research was performed at the Hektoen Research Institute of Cook County Hospital.
All stapling instruments used in this study were provided by the U. S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, Connecticut.
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.
About this article
Cite this article
Orsay, C.P., Bass, E.M., Firfer, B. et al. Blood flow in colon anastomotic stricture formation. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 202–206 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052452
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052452