Skip to main content
Log in

Price competition and node-linkage association

  • Published:
Papers in Regional Science

Abstract

This paper presents a short-run model of price competition for markets defined as networks (node-linkage associations) under perfectly inelastic consumer demand. Analytical and simulation analyses show an inverse relationship between firms' equilibrium price schedules and the number of directly connected rival firms. As the degree of network connectivity increases, holding the size of the overall market constant, average equilibrium mill prices tend to decrease at a decreasing rate. This implies that the intensity of competition in a network increases as the network becomes more fully connected, and equilibrium price levels converge at some theoretical minimum that is specific to the prevailing market conditions. Price-connectivity relations are shown to be highly sensitive to network structure and the distribution of price conjectural parameters. In addition, the paper briefly discusses the welfare implications of price reductions from an accessible and cost-efficient firm in a network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, B. L. 1979. Spatial microeconomics: implications for the use of concentration ratios to represent monopoly power.Review of Regional Studies 9: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. 1984. On the ability of spatial competitors to price discriminate.Journal of Industrial Economics 33: 251–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L., and Faminow, M. D. 1985. An alternative view of pricing in retail food markets.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L., and Faminow, M. D. 1988. The impact of experience on prices and profits in experimental duopoly markets.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9: 345–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L., and Faminow, M. D. 1990. Geographic price interdependence and the extent of economic markets.Economic Geography 66: 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M., and Moreaux, M. 1984. Equilibres de duopole et variations conjecturales reactionelles.Canadian Journal of Economics 7: 111–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. 1981. Duopoly models with consistent conjectural variation.American Economic Review 71: 934–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., and Van Order, R. 1989. Spatial competition with consistent conjectures.Journal of Regional Science 29: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. 1986. Nash equilibrium in duopoly with products defined by two characteristics.Rand Journal of Economics 17: 431–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faminow, M. D., and Benson, B. L. 1985. Spatial economics: implications for food market response to retail price reporting.The Journal of Consumer Affairs 19: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faminow, M. D., and Benson, B. L. 1990. Integration of spatial markets.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fik, T. J. 1988. Spatial price competition and retail food price reporting.Economic Geography 64: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fik, T. J., and Mulligan, G. F. 1991. Spatial competition: a network approach.Geographical Analysis 23 (forthcoming).

  • Gabszewicz, J., and Thisse, J.-F. 1986. Spatial competition and the location of firms. InFundamentals of pure and applied economics, eds. J. Gabszewicz and J.-F. Thisse pp. 1–71. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanjoul, P., and Thill, J.-C. 1987. Elements of planar analysis in spatial competition.Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 423–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. F., and Fik, T. J. 1989a. Price variation in spatial oligopoly.Geographical Analysis 21: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. F., and Fik, T. J. 1989b. Price variation in spatial markets: the case of perfectly inelastic demand.The Annals of Regional Science 24: 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. F., and Fik, T. J. 1989c. Asymmetrical price conjectural variation in spatial competition models.Economic Geography 65: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., and Aoyagi, M. 1990. Existence of equilibrium configurations of competitive firms on an infinite two-dimensional space.Journal of Urban Economics 28 (forthcoming).

  • Okabe, A., and Suzuki, A. 1987. Stability of spatial competition for a large number of firms on a bounded two-dimensional space.Environment and Planning A 19: 1067–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. 1989.Some results on the hotelling problem in two dimensions — minimum differentiation once again. Fairbanks: University of Alaska, School of Management Working Paper 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. S. 1981a. Testing for market preemption using sequential location data.Bell Journal of Economics 12: 129–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. S. 1981b. Tests of two locational implications of a theory of market preemption.Canadian Journal of Economics 14: 313–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. S. 1989. Evaluating a supermarket relocation strategy using spatial competition analysis.The Annals of Regional Science 23: 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fik, T.J. Price competition and node-linkage association. Papers in Regional Science 70, 53–69 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463443

Keywords

Navigation