Summary
Sex pheromone released byMegoura viciae oviparae was collected and analysed for the quantity and relative amounts of each of the two biologically active components. Pheromone was not produced until the second day of the adult stadium, increasing in quantity up to day 6 and then declining. The ratio of (−)—(1R, 4aS, 7S, 7aR)-nepetalactol: (+)—(4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactone pheromone mixture changed fromca 1:5 on days 2–6 after adult moult to 1:12 on days 7 and 8, but returned to the original composition by day 10.
The behaviour of male aphids from three species,Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aphis fabae, andM. viciae, was observed in an olfactometer and in two mating bioassays, using both synthetic and natural sex pheromone. The two active components were combined in ratios which mimicked the pheromone released by these and other aphid species. It was found that:
-
1.
M. viciae males were attracted by the synthetic sex pheromone in the olfactometer, with maximal attraction to the conspecific ratio. On the other hand,A. pisum andA. fabae males did not respond to any pheromone mixtures in the olfactometer.
-
2.
Males of all three species could be induced to attempt copulation with conspecific virginoparae treated with synthetic pheromone (virginoparae reproduce asexually and do not produce the sex pheromone). The response inM. viciae andA. fabae was equivalent to that elicited by natural pheromone released by calling conspecific oviparae, but inA. pisum it was slightly lower.
-
3.
InM. viciae, the relative activities of the nepetalactol and the nepetalactone were reversed in the two assays. Thus the former was more potent in the mating bioassay, the latter in the olfactometer. The nepetalactol appeared to act as an aphrodisiac and the nepetalactone as an attractant.
-
4.
Mating response was greatest at the species-specific ratio of the two components, but males were also significantly responsive to mixtures mimicking the sex pheromone of other species.
The results are discussed in relation to mate seeking, together with the mechanisms involved in species-specific mating.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blackman RL, Eastop VF (1985) Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification Guide. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
Blight MM (1990) Techniques for isolation and characterisation of volatile semiochemicals of phytophagous insects. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones, Pheromones and Related Compounds, Reading 1989. In press
Campbell CAM, Dawson GW, Griffiths DC, Pettersson J, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (1990) The sex attractant pheromone of the damson-hop aphidPhorodon humuli (Homoptera, Aphididae) J Chem Ecol in press
Cardé RT (1984) Chemo-orientation in flying insects. Pp 111–124in Bell WJ & Cardé RT (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. London: Chapman and Hall
Dawson GW, Griffiths DC, Janes NF, Mudd A, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (1987) Identification of an aphid sex pheromone. Nature 325:614–616
Dawson GW, Griffiths DC, Merritt LA, Mudd A, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (1988) The sex pheromone of the greenbug,Schizaphis graminum. Entomol exp appl 48:91–93
Dawson GW, Janes NF, Mudd A, Pickett JA, Slawin AMZ, Wadhams LJ, Williams DJ (1989) The aphid sex pheromone. Pure appl Chem 61:555–558
Dawson GW, Griffiths DC, Merritt LA, Mudd A, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (1990) Aphid semiochemicals — a review, and recent advances on the sex pheromone. J Chem Ecol, in press
Eisenbach J, Mittler TE (1980) An aphid circadian rhythm: factors affecting the release of sex pheromone by oviparae of the greenbug,Schizaphis graminum. J Insect Physiol 26:511–516
Eisenbach J, Mittler TE (1987) Sex pheromone discrimination by male aphids of a biotype ofSchizaphis graminum. Entomol exp appl 43:181–182
Kennedy JS, Thomas AAG (1974) Behaviour of some low-flying aphids in wind. Ann appl Biol 76:143–159
Klinghauf FA (1987) Host plant finding and acceptance. Pp 209–233in Minks AK & Harrewijn P (eds) Aphids, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 2A. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Less AD (1973) Photoperiodic time measurement in the aphidMegoura viciae. J Insect Physiol 19:2279–2316
Lees AD (1989) The photoperiodic responses and phenology of an English strain of the pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum. Ecol Entomol 14:69–78
Marsh D (1972) Sex pheromone in the aphidMegoura viciae. Nature 238:31–32
Marsh D (1973) Studies on the sex pheromones of the vetch aphid,Megoura viciae. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London
Marsh D (1975) Responses of male aphids to the female sex pheromone inMegoura viciae Buckton. J Ent (A) 50:43–64
Pettersson J (1970a) An aphid sex attractant I. Biological studies. Entomol Scand 1:63–73
Pettersson J (1970b) Studies onRhopalosiphum padi (L.) I. Laboratory studies on olfaction responses to the winter hostPrunus padus L. Lantbrukshogsk Annlr 36:381–399
Pettersson J (1971) An aphid sex attractant II. Histological, ethological and comparative studies. Entomol Scand 2:81–93
Sakuma M, Fukami H (1985) The linear track olfactometer: an assay device for taxes of the German cockroach,Blattella germanica (L.) (Dicty-optera: Blattellidae) toward their aggregation pheromone. Appl Entomol Zool 20:387–402
Steffan AW (1990) Courtship behaviour and possible pheromone spread by hindleg raising in sexual females of aphids (Homoptera: Aphidinea). Entomol Gener 15:33–49
Tamaki G, Butt BA, Landis BJ (1970) Arrest and aggregation of maleMyzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:955–960
Tamaki Y (1985) Sex pheromones. Pp 145–191in Kerkut GA & Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 9. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hardie, J., Holyoak, M., Nicholas, J. et al. Aphid sex pheromone components: Age-dependent release by females and species-specific male response. Chemoecology 1, 63–68 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325230
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325230