Summary
Comparison of Size Effect for Different Types of Strength Tests
Different theories have been proposed to explain and predict size effect. Notable is Weibull's “Weakest link theory”. In addition various theories have been founded on strain energy consumption at failure. The present paper suggests a theoretical approach, based on energy considerations and mode of failure, which holds for diverse types of mechanical testing. Maximum size effect is assumed to be associated with failure through development of a single fracture plane and a lack of size effect is associated with failure affecting a volume of material. The quantitative expression of the theoretical approach is based on the relationship between load at failure (P) and cross sectional area of the specimen (A):P=KA n wheren expresses size effect andK is a constant.
The theoretically lowestn-value equals 0.75 expressing maximal size effect whereas the theoretically highestn-value is 1.00 expressing lack of size effect.n-values evaluated from published data for various mechanical tests indeed lie between these limits and appear to be related to type of test, material properties and specimen shape. Point load tests and Brazilian tests are generally associated with large size effects. This may be attributed to the test conditions which promote development of single fracture planes. On the other hand relatively small size effects are generally found for uniaxial compression tests. Failure in these tests characteristically occurs through multiple fracturing and crushing and therefore affects a volume of material rather than a single plane. Brittleness seems to be associated with large size effects and ductility with small size effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abu Sayed, A. S., Brechtel, C. E.: Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Size on the Uniaxial Comperison Strength of Cedar City Quartz Diorite — 17th U. S. Symp. on Rock Mechanics, 5D6-1-9, August 1976.
Bernaix, J.: New laboratory Methods of Studying the Mechanical Properties of Rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.6 43–90 (1969).
Bieniawski, Z. T.: The Effect of Specimen Size on Compressive Strength of Coal. Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.5 325–335 (1968).
Brady, B. T., Duvall, W. I., Horino, F. G.: An Experimental Determination of the True Uniaxial Stress-Strain Behaviour of Brittle Rock. Rock Mech.5 107–120 (1973).
Broch, E., Franklin, J. A.: The Point-Load Strength Test. Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.9 669–697 (1972).
Brook, N.: A Method of Overcoming Both Shape and Size Effect in Point Load Testing. Proc. of a Conference on Rock Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne, 53–70, April 1974.
Brook, N.: The Use of Irregular Specimens for Rock Strength Tests. Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.14 193–202 (1977).
Dreyer, W.: The Science of Rock Mechanics. Part 1. The Strength Properties of Rocks, Transtechpublications. 51–52 (1972).
Habib, P., Vouille, G.: Sur la disparition de l'effet aux hautes pressions. Cr. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris262 715–717 (1966).
Hudson, J. A., Brown, E. T., Fairhurst, C.: Shape of the Complete Stressstrain Curve for Rock. 13th Symp. on Rock Mechanics, 773–795, Sept. 1971.
Il'nitskaya, E. I.: Effect of Rock-Specimen Size on Mechanical Properties in Shear Tests. Mechanical Properties of Rocks. Ed. by Protodyakonov, Koifman and others. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 57–63, 1969.
Lundborg, H.: The Strength-Size Relation of Granite. Int. J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.4 269–272 (1967).
Mogi, K.: The Influence of the Dimension of Specimens on the Fracture Strength of Rocks. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokio Univ.40, (1962).
Pratt, H. R., Black, A. D., Brown, W. S., Brace, W. F.: The Effect of Specimen Size on the Mechanical Properties of Unjointed Diorite. Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.9 513–529 (1972).
Pratt, H. R., Black, A. D., Brache, W. F.: Friction and Deformation of Jointed Quartz Diorite. Proc. 3rd. Cong. of ISRM, Denver, Vol. II A, 306–310 (1974).
Reichmuth, D. R.: Point Load Testing of Brittle Materials to Determine Tensile Strength and Relative Brittleness. Proc. 9th Symp. Rock Mechanics, Univ. of Colorado, 134–159 (1968).
Skelly, W. A., Wolgamott, J., Vang, Fan-Den: Coal Mine Strength and Deformation Prediction Through Laboratory Sample Testing. 18th U. S. Symp. on Rock Mechanics, 2B5, 1–5, June 1977.
Sundae, L. S.: Effect of Specimen Volume on Apparent Tensile Strength of Three Igneous Rocks. U. S. B. M. R. I. 7846, 1974.
Townsend, J. M., Jennings, W. C., Haycocks, C., Neal, M. G., Johanson, L. P.: A Relation Between the Ultimate Compressive Strength of Cubes and Cylinders for Coal Specimens. 18th U. S. Symp. on Rock Mechanics, 4Ab 1–6, June 1977.
Wagner, H., Schümann, E. H. R.: The Stamp-Load Bearing Strength of Rock, An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. Rock Mech.3 185–207 (1971).
Weibull, W.: The Phenomenon of Rupture in Solids. Ingvetensk Akad. Handli, No. 153, 5–55 (1939).
Suggested Methods for Determining the Slaking, Swelling, Porosity, and Related Rock Index Properties. International Society for Rock Mechanics. Lisabon, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 4 Figures
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsur-Lavie, Y., Denekamp, S.A. Comparison of size effect for different types of strength tests. Rock Mechanics 15, 243–254 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240592
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240592