Abstract
This paper addresses a relatively common “scientific” (as opposed to philosophical) conception of intertheoretic reduction between physical theories. This is the sense of reduction in which one (typically newer and more refined) theory is said to reduce to another (typically older and “coarser”) theory in the limit as some small parameter tends to zero. Three examples of such reductions are discussed: First, the reduction of Special Relativity (SR) to Newtonian Mechanics (NM) as (v/c)2→0; second, the reduction of wave optics to geometrical optics as λ → 0; and third, the reduction of Quantum Mechanics (QM) to Classical Mechanics (CM) asħ→0. I argue for the following two claims. First, the case of SR reducing to NM is an instance of a genuine reductive relationship while the latter two cases are not. The reason for this concerns the nature of the limiting relationships between the theory pairs. In the SR/NM case, it is possible to consider SR as a regular perturbation of NM; whereas in the cases of wave and geometrical optics and QM/CM, the perturbation problem is singular. The second claim I wish to support is that as a result of the singular nature of the limits between these theory pairs, it is reasonable to maintain that third theories exist describing the asymptotic limiting domains. In the optics case, such a theory has been called “catastrophe optics”. In the QM/CM case, it is semiclassical mechanics. Aspects of both theories are discussed in some detail.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Airy, G.B.: 1838, ‘On the Intensity of Light in the Neighborhood of a Caustic’,Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,6, 379–403.
Arnold, V.I.: 1989,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Second Edition, (trans.) K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Batterman, R.: 1991, ‘Chaos, Quantization, and the Correspondence Principle’,Synthese 89, 189–227.
Batterman, R.: 1993a, ‘Defining Chaos’,Philosophy of Science 60, 43–66.
Batterman, R.: 1993b, ‘Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics’,PSA 1992, vol. 2, 50–65.
Bender, C. M. and Orszag, S. A.: 1978,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Berry, M. V.: 1981, ‘Singularities in Waves and Rays’, in R. Balian, M. Kléman and J. P. Poirier (eds.),Physics of Defects (Les Houches, Session XXXV, 1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 453–543.
Berry, M. V.: 1983, ‘Semiclassical Mechanics of Regular and Irregular Motion’, in G. Iooss, R. H. G. Helleman, and R. Stora (eds.),Chaotic Behavior of Deterministic Systems, (Les Houches Session XXXVI, 1981), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 171–271.
Berry, M. V.: 1986, ‘Twinkling Exponents in the Catastrophe Theory of Random Short Waves’, in B. J. Uscinski (ed.),Wave Propagation and Scattering, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 11–35.
Berry, M. V.: 1991, ‘Some Quantum-to-Classical Asymptotics’, in M. J. Giannoni, A. Voros, and J. Zinn-Justin (eds.),Chaos and Quantum Physics (Les Houches Session LII, 1989), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 253–303.
Berry, M. V., Balazs, N. L., Tabor, M. and Voros, A.: 1979, ‘Quantum Maps’,Annals of Physics 122, 26–63.
Berry, M. V. and Upstill, C.: 1980, ‘Catastrophe Optics: Morphologies of Caustics and their Diffraction Patterns’, in E. Wolf (ed.),Progress in Optics XVIII, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 257–346.
Bruce, A. and D. Wallace: 1989, ‘Critical Point Phenomena: Universal Physics at Large Length Scales’, in Paul Davies (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 236–67.
Goldstein, H.: 1950,Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Heller, E. J.: 1991, ‘Wavepacket Dynamics and Quantum Chaology’, in G. Iooss, R. H. G. Helleman, and R. Stora (eds.),Chaotic Behavior of Deterministic Systems, (Les Houches Session XXXVI, 1981), North-Holalnd, Amsterdam, pp. 547–663.
Jones, R.: 1991, ‘Realism About What?’,Philosophy of Science 58, 185–202.
Littlejohn, R. G.: 1992, ‘The Van Vleck Formula, Maslov Theory, and Phase Space Geometry’,Journal of Statistical Physics 68(1/2), 7–50.
Maslov, V. P. and Fedoriuk, M. V.: 1981,Semi-classical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics, (trans.) J. Niederle and J. Tolar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Nickles, T.: 1973, ‘Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction’,The Journal of Philosophy LXX(7), 181–201.
O'Connor, P., Tomsovic, S. and Heller, E. J.: 1992, ‘Semiclassical Dynamics in the Strongly Chaotic Regime: Breaking the Log Time Barrier’,Physica D 55, 340–357.
Poston, T. and Stewart, I.: 1978,Catastrophe Theory and its Applications, Pitman, London.
Radder, H.: 1991, ‘Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, 195–226.
Rohrlich, F.: 1988, ‘Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 295–312.
Rohrlich, F.: 1989, ‘The Logic of Reduction: The Case of Gravitation’,Foundations of Physics 19, 1151–70.
Rohrlich, F.: 1990, ‘There is Good Physics in Theory Reduction’,Foundations of Physics 20, 1399–412.
Rohrlich, F. and Hardin, L.: 1983, ‘Established Theories’,Philosophy of Science 50, 603–17.
Sklar, L.: 1967, ‘Types of Inter-theoretic Reduction’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18, 109–24.
Tabor, M.: 1989,Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank Roger Jones and Joe Mendola for valuable comments on this and related work. Discussions with Bill Wimsatt also helped me get clear about certain issues related to intertheoretic reductions. Of course, they are not responsible for any mistakes and misinterpretations that still remain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Batterman, R.W. Theories between theories: Asymptotic limiting intertheoretic relations. Synthese 103, 171–201 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090047
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090047