Iwant a girl Just like the girl That married dear old dad (popular song of the 1920s)
Abstract
The first section reviews how much and what kind of assortative mating occurs. It considers the genetic consequences of any departure from random mating, then discusses the effects of consanguinity or inbreeding on the offspring. Suffice it to say here that these effects are generally unfavorable, so that one may say that forgenetic reasons a high similarity between spouses is not favored. The next section discusses the social consequences of marital choice in terms of theories and research related to mate selection and marital adjustment. At this point, we may summarize two opposing views of what makes for a good marriage: (1) psychological similarity and (2) complementariness of needs of husband and wife. We will see that most of the evidence tends to support the first view, so we can say that for social reasons similarity between spouses is favored. Another topic touched on is whether marriage leads to an increase in similarity over time, or, in genetic terms, to a partial convergence of phenotypes, which could lead to an overestimation of the degree of genotypic similarity. Next, the theory is discussed that homogamy for socioeconomic status is responsible for the observed correlations between abilities and between beauty and brains. The final section summarizes some research on factors influencing the personal preferences for personality and physical type which govern the selection of potential mates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, R. H. (1943). Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection: Fifty year trend in Philadelphia.Am. Sociol. Rev. 8: 288–294.
Adams, M. S., and Neel, J. V. (1967). Children of incest.Pediatrics 40: 55–62.
Adams, M. S., Davidson, R. T., and Cornell, P. (1967). Adoption risk of the children of incest: A preliminary report.Child Welfare 47: 137–143.
Anderson, C. A. (1932). The sociological approach to the study of assortative mating. International Congress for Studies Regarding Population Problems VIII, pp. 600–634.
Becker, G. (1964). The complementary needs hypothesis: Authoritarianism, dominance and other EPPS scores.J. Personal. 32: 45–56.
Bernard, J. S. (1956).Remarriage. Dryden Press, New York.
Bernstein, F. (1931).Die geographische Verteilung der Blutgruppen und ihre anthropologische Bedeutung. Comitato Italiano per lo Studio dei Problemi della Populazione, Instituto Poligraphico dello State, Rome, pp. 227–243.
Book, J. A. (1957). Genetical investigations in a North Swedish population: The offspring of first cousin marriages.Ann. Hum. Genet. 21: 191–221.
Bossard, H. S. (1932). Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection.Am. J. Sociol. 38: 219–224.
Bowerman, C. E. (1952). Assortative mating by previous marital status, Seattle 1939–1946.Am. Sociol. Rev. 18: 171.
Bowerman, C. E., and Day, B. R. (1956). A test of the theory of complementary needs as applied to couples during courtship.Am. Sociol. Rev. 21: 602–605.
Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Ronakrantz, P. S., and Vogel, S. R. (1970). Sex role sterotypes and clinical judgments of mental health.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34: 1–7.
Burchinal, L. G., Hawkes, G. R., and Gardner, B. (1957). Personality characteristics and marital satisfaction.Soc. Forces 35: 218–222.
Burgess, E. W., and Wallin, P. (1944). Homogamy in personality characteristics.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 39: 475–481.
Burgess, E. W., and Wallin, P. (1953).Engagement and Marriage, J. P. Lippincott, New York.
Burks, B. S. (1928). The relative influence of nature and nurture upon mental development. 27th Yearbook Nat. Soc. Study Educ., PartI, pp. 219–321.
Carter, C. O. (1967). Risk to offspring of incest.Lancet 10: 436–437.
Cattell, R. B., and Nesselroade, J. R. (1967). Likeness and completeness theories examined by sixteen personality factor measures on stably and unstably married couples.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 7: 351–361.
Clark, P. J. (1956). The heritability of certain anthropometric characters as ascertained from measurements of twins.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 8: 49–54.
Clark, P. J., and Spuhler, J. N. (1959). Differential fertility in relation to body dimensions.Hum. Biol. 31: 121–137.
Cohen, T., Bloch, N., Flam, Y., Kadar, M., and Goldschmidt, E. (1963). School attainments in an immigrant village. In Goldschmidt, E. (ed.),The Genetics of Migrant and Isolate Populations, Williams & Wilkins, New York, pp. 35–351.
Corsini, R. J. (1956). Understanding and similarity in marriage.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 52: 327–332.
Crook, M. N. (1937). Intra-family relationships in personality test performance.Psychol. Record 1: 479–502.
Crook, M. N., and Thomas, M. (1934). Family relationships in ascendance-submission.Publ. Univ. Calif. Educ., Phil. Psychol. 1: 189–192.
Davie, M. L., and Reeves, R. J. (1939). Propinquity of residence before marriage.Am. J. Sociol. 44: 510–525.
Drewery, J., and Rae, J. B. (1969). A group comparison of alcoholic and non-alcoholic marriages using the interpersonal perception technique.Brit. J. Psychiat. 115: 287–300.
Dymond, R. (1954). Interpersonal perception and marital happiness.Can. J. Psychol. 8: 164–171.
Eckland, B. K. (1968). Theories of mate selection.Eugen. Quart. 15: 71–84.
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Personality and attitudes to sex: a factorial study.Personality 1: 355–376.
Farber, B. (1957). An index of marital integration.Sociometry 20: 117–134.
Ferak, V., Lichardova, Z., and Bojnova, V. (1968). Endogamy, exogamy and stature.Eugen. Quart. 15: 273–276.
Garrison, R. J., Anderson, V. E., and Reed, S. C. (1968). Assortative marriage.Eugen. Quart. 15: 113–127.
Glass, B., and Li, C. C. (1953). The dynamics of racial intermixture—an analysis based on the American Negro.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 5: 1–20.
Goodrich, W., Ryder, R. G., and Raush, H. L. (1968). Patterns of newly wed marriage.J. Marriage Family 30: 383–391.
Gottesman, I. I. (1965). Personality and natural selection. In Vandenberg, S. G. (ed.),Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics, Academic Press, New York.
Gray, H. (1949). Psychological types in married people.J. Soc. Psychol. 29: 189–200.
Harris, J. A. (1912). Assortative mating in man.Popular Sci. Monthly 80: 476–492.
Hill, M. (1968). Familial trends in personality traits as measured by the MMPI: Prospective assortative mating patterns and pedigree analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Himes, J. S. (1952). Value consensus in mate selection among Negroes.Marriage Family Living 14: 317–321.
Hoffeditz, E. L. (1934). Family resemblances in personality traits.J. Soc. Psychol. 5: 214–227.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Cultural factors in the selection of marriage mates.Am. Sociol. Rev. 15: 619–627.
Hudson, J. W., and Henze, L. F. (1969). Campus values in mate selection: A replication.J. Marriage Family 31: 772–775.
Iliffe, A. H. (1960). A study of preferences in feminine beauty.Brit. J. Psychol. 51: 267–273.
Jacobson, P. (1952). An investigation of psychic homogamy and heterogamy. Unpublished Master's thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Jacquard, A. (1970).Structures génétiques des populations, Editions Masson, Paris.
Jones, H. E. (1928). A first study of parent-child resemblance. 27th Yearbook Nat. Soc. Study Educ.,Part I, pp. 61–72.
Kallman, F. J., and Mickey, J. S. (1946). Genetic concepts andfolie à deux.J. Hered. 37: 298–305.
Katz, A. M., and Hill, R. (1958). Residential propinquity and marital selection: a review of theory, method, and fact.Marriage and Family Living 20: 27–35.
Katz, I., Glucksberg, S., and Kraus, R. (1960). Need satisfaction and Edwards PPS scores in married couples.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 203–205.
Kelly, E. L. (1941). Marital compatibility as related to personality traits of husbands and wives as rated by self and spouse.J. Soc. Psychol. 13: 193–198.
Kennedy, R. J. R. (1944). Single or triple melting pot? Intermarriage trends in New Haven, 1870–1940.Am. J. Sociol. 49: 331–339.
Kerckhoff, A. C., and Davis, K. E. (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection.Am. Sociol. Rev. 27: 295–303.
Kernodle, W. (1959). Some implications of the homogamy-complementary needs theories of mate selection for sociological research.Soc. Forces 38: 145–152.
Kherumian, R., and Schreider, E. (1963). Repartition départementale de la stature, du poids et de la circonférence thoracique en France Metropolitaine.Biotypologie 24: 1–27.
Kiesler, S. B., and Baral, R. L. (1970). The search for a romantic partner: The effects of self-esteem and physical attractiveness on romantic behavior. In Gergen, K. J., and Marlowe, D. (eds.),Personality and Social Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Kiser, C. V. (1968). Assortative mating by educational attainment in relation to fertility.Eugen. Quart. 15: 98–112.
Kodama, H., and Shinagawa, F. (1953).WISC Chino Shindan Kensaho (The WISC Intelligence Test), Nihon Bunka Kagakusha, Tokyo, 138 pp.
Kortmulder, K. (1968). An ethological theory of the incest taboo and exogamy.Curr. Anthropol. 9: 437–441.
Kreitman, N. (1964). The patient's spouse.Brit. J. Psychiat. 110: 159–173.
Kreitman, N. (1968). Married couples admitted to mental hospital.Brit. J. Psychiat. 114: 699–718.
Ktsanes, T. (1955). Mate selection on the basis of personality type: A study utilizing an empirical typology of personality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 20: 547–551.
Levinger, G. (1964). Note on need complementarity in marriage.Psychol. Bull. 61: 153–157.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949).Les structures élementaires de la parenté, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. [id. (1968).The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Beacon Press, Boston].
Levitt, H., and Baker, R. (1969). Relative psychopathology of marital partners.Family Process 8: 33–42.
Lewontin, R., Kirk, D., and Crow, J. (1968). Selective mating, assortative mating and inbreeding: Definitions and implications.Eugen. Quart. 15: 141–143.
Lindzey, G. (1967). Some remarks concerning incest, the incest taboo, and psychoanalytic theory.Am. Psychologist 22: 1051–1059.
Lipetz, M. E., Cohen, I. H., Dworin, J. and Rogers, L. S. (1970). Need complementarity, marital stability and marital satisfaction. In Gergen, K. J., and Marlowe, D. (eds.),Personality and social behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp. 201–212.
Livingstone, F. B. (1969). Genetics, ecology and the origins of incest and exogamy.Curr. Anthropo. 10: 45–49.
Locke, H. (1951).Predicting Adjustment in Marriage, Holt, New York.
Luckey, E. B. (1960a). Marital satisfaction and congruent self-spouse concepts.Soc. Forces 39: 153–157.
Luckey, E. B. (1960b). Marital satisfaction and parent concepts.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 195–204.
Lutz, F. (1918). Assortative mating in man.Science 16: 249–250.
Montmollin, M. de (1958). Le niveau intellectual des recrues du contingent.Population 13: 259–268.
Moore, J. M. (1951). The TAT as a measure of complementary needs in college. Unpublished Master's thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Morton, N. E., Chin, S. C., and Ming, P. M. (1967).Genetics of Interracial Crosses in Hawaii, Karger, Basel.
Murray, H. A. et al. (1938).Explorations in personality, Oxford University Press, New York.
Murstein, B. I. (1961). A complementary need hypothesis in newly wed and middle aged couples.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 63: 194–197.
Murstein, B. I. (1967). The relationship of mental health to marital choice and courtship progress.J. Marriage Family 29: 447–451.
Neel, J. V., and Schull, W. J. (1956).The Effect of Exposure to the Atomic Bombs on Pregnancy Termination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publication 461, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 241 pp.
Nielsen, J. (1964). Mental disorders in married couples (assortative mating).Brit. J. Psychiat. 110: 683–697.
Pearson, K. (1906). Reply to certain criticisms of Mr. G. U. Yule.Biometrika 5: 470–476.
Pearson, K., and Lee, A. (1903). On the laws of inheritance in man.Biometrika 2: 372–377.
Pickford, J. H., Signori, E. I., and Rempel, H. (1967). Husband-wife difference in personality traits as a factor in marital happiness.Psychol. Rep. 20: 1087–1090.
Preston, M. G., Peltz, W. L., Mudd, E. H., and Froscher, H. B. (1952). Impressions of personality as a function of marital conflict.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 47: 326–336.
Reed, E. W., and Reed, S. C. (1965).Mental Retardation: A Family Study, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Reed, T. E. (1969). Caucasian genes in American Negroes.Science 165: 762–768.
Rele, J. R. (1965). Trends and differentials in the American age at marriage.Milbank Memorial Fund Quart. 43: 224.
Richardson, H. (1939). Studies of mental resemblance between husbands and wives and between friends.Psychol. Bull. 36: 104–142.
Roos, D. E. (1956).Complementary needs in mate selection, a study based on Rtype factor analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Salzano, F. M., and Freire-Maia, N. (1970).Problems in Human Biology, A Study of Brazilian Populations, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
Schaller, G. B. (1963).The Mountain Gorilla—Ecology and Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schellenberg, J. A. (1960). Homogamy in personal values and the “Field of eligibles”.Social Forces 39: 157–162.
Schellenberg, J. A., and Bee, L. S. (1960). A re-examination of the theory of complementary needs in mate selection.Marriage Family Living 22: 227–232.
Schiller, B. (1932). A quantitative analysis of marriage selection in a small group.J. Soc. Psychol. 3: 297–319.
Schooley, M. (1936). Personality resemblances among married couples.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 31: 340–347.
Schreider, E. (1969). Inbreeding, biological and mental variation in France.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 30: 215–220.
Schull, W. J., and Neel, J. V. (1965).The Effects of Inbreeding on Japanese Children, Harper & Row, New York.
Schutz, W. C. (1958).FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior, Rinehart, New York.
Slatis, H. M., and Hoene, R. E. (1961). The effect of consanguinity on the distribution of continuously variable characteristics.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 13: 28–31.
Spuhler, J. N. (1962). Empirical studies on quantitative human genetics. InThe Use of Vital and Health Statistics for Genetic and Radiation Studies, United Nations, New York.
Spuhler, J. N. (1967). Behavior and mating patterns in human populations. In Spuhler, J. N. (ed.),Genetic Diversity and Human Behavior, Aldine, Chicago.
Spuhler, J. N., and Clark, P. J. (1961). Migration into the human breeding population of Ann Arbor, Michigan 1900–1950.Hum. Biol. 33: 223–236.
Sutter, J., and Goux, J. M. (1962). Evolution de la consanguinité en France de 1926 à 1958 avec des données récentes détailles.Population 17: 683–702.
Sward, K., and Friedman, M. B. (1935). The family resemblance in temperament.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 30: 256–261.
Terman, L. M., and Buttenwieser, P. (1935). Personality factors in marital compatibility.J. Soc. Psychol. 6: 143–171, 267–289.
Terman, L. M., and Oden, M. (1947).The gifted child grows up: 25 year followup of a superior group, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Tharp, R. G. (1963). Psychological patterning in marriage.Psychol. Bull. 60: 97–117.
Wiggins, J. S., Wiggins, N., and Conger, J. C. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 10: 82–90.
Wiggins, N., and Wiggins, J. S. (1969). A typological analysis of male preferences for female body types.Multivar. Behav. Res. 4: 89–102.
Willoughby, R. R. (1927). Family similarities in mental test abilities.Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 2: 235–275.
Willoughby, R. R. (1928). Family similarities in mental test abilities. 27th Yearbook Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ.,Part I, pp. 55–59.
Winch, R. F. (1955). The theory of complementary needs in mate selection: Final results on the test of the general hypothesis.Am. Sociol. Rev. 20: 52–56.
Winch, R. F. (1958).Mate Selection, A Study of Complementary Needs, Harper Bros., New York.
Wolf, A. P. (1968). Adopt a daughter-in-law, marry a sister: A Chinese solution to the problem of the incest taboo.Am. Anthropol. 70: 864–874.
Wright, S. (1969).The theory of Gene Frequencies (Vol. 2 ofEvolution and the Genetics of Populations), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vandenberg, S.G. Assortative mating, or who marries whom?. Behav Genet 2, 127–157 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065686
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065686