Abstract
In bioequivalence studies C max and AUCserve as the primary pharmacokinetic characteristics of rate and extent of absorption. Based on pharmacokinetic relationships and on empirical evidence, the distribution of these characteristics corresponds to a multiplicative model, which implies a logarithmic normal distribution in the case of a parametric analysis. Hence, consideration is given to exact and approximate formulas of sample sizes in the case of a multiplicative model.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
D. J. Schuirmann. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the bioequivalence of average bioavailability.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 15:657–680 (1987).
K. F. Phillips. Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 18:137–144 (1990).
D. B. Owen. A special case of a bivariate non-central t-distribution.Biometrika 52:437–446 (1965).
J. P. Liu and S. C. Chow. Sample size determination for the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 20:101–104 (1992).
CPMP Working Party on the Efficacy of Medicinal Products.Note for Guidance: Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (1991).
J. P. Liu and C. S. Weng. Estimation of direct formulation effect under log-normal distribution in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.Statist. Med. 11:881–896 (1992).
E. Diletti, D. Hauschke, and V. W. Steinijans. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 29:1–8 (1991).
Food and Drug Administration. Hearing of the Generic Drugs Advisory Committee conducted by the FDA, 26–27 September, 1991. (Audio transcripts by C.A.S.E.T. Associates, Virginia 22030, 1992).
V. W. Steinijans, D. Hauschke, and J. H. G. Jonkman. Controversies in bioequivalence studies.Clin. Pharmacokin. 22:247–253 (1992).
W. W. Hauck and S. Anderson. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 30:181–187 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauschke, D., Steinijans, V.W., Diletti, E. et al. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment using a multiplicative model. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 20, 557–561 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061471
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061471