Abstract
We have developed a shelterbelt boundary-layer numerical model to study the patterns and dynamic processes relating to flow interaction with shelterbelts. The model simulates characteristics of all three zones of airflow passing over and through shelterbelts: the windward windspeed-reduction zone, the overspeeding zone above the shelterbelt, and the leeward windspeed-reduction zone. Locations of the maximum windspeed reduction and recirculation zone, as well as the leeward windspeed-recovery rate are well simulated by the model. Where comparisons with field measurements and wind-tunnel experiments were possible, the model demonstrated good performance for flows over and through shelters ranging from almost completely open to almost solid.
The dynamic pressure resulting from the convergence and divergence of the flow field alters the perturbation pressure field. The disturbed pressure controls not only the formation of the separated flow but also the location of maximum windspeed reduction, streamline curvature, speed-up over the shelterbelt, and leeward windspeed recovery rate. The interaction of pressure with the flow produces complex flow patterns, the characteristics of which are determined, to a great extent, by shelterbelt structure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- <>:
-
Spatial averaged value
- (−):
-
Temporal averaged value
- (′):
-
Departure of variable from its averaged value
- A :
-
Leaf surface-area density
- ABL:
-
Atmospheric boundary layer
- C :
-
Drag coefficient for obstacle exerted on air
- C d :
-
Drag coefficient for unit plant area density
- c i :
-
Experimental constants of turbulent closure scheme (Mellor and Yamada, 1982)
- E :
-
Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)
- F i :
-
Drag force in thei direction exerted on air flow by obstacle elements
- f k :
-
Coriolis parameter
- g i :
-
Acceleration vector due to gravity
- H :
-
Height of shelterbelt
- i, j, k, q :
-
Subscript variables, indicatingx, y andz directions, respectively, and grid numbers in these three directions
- K 0 :
-
Turbulent exchange coefficient for neutral, obstacle-free ABL
- K m :
-
Turbulent exchange coefficient for momentum transport
- K E :
-
Turbulent exchange coefficient for TKE transport
- k r :
-
Resistance coefficient of shelterbelts
- l :
-
Mixing length of turbulence
- MKE:
-
Mean kinetic energy
- n :
-
Timestep of model integration
- n,n i :
-
Vector and its component in thei direction of the interface of the averaging volume
- p :
-
Atmospheric pressure perturbation
- S :
-
Interface surface of the averaging volume
- t :
-
Time
- U :
-
Total mean windspeed
- u, w :
-
Mean windspeed components inx andz directions, respectively
- u′, w′ :
-
Fluctuating windspeed components inx andz directions
- u i :
-
Windspeed in thei direction
- u * :
-
Friction velocity
- u *0 :
-
Friction velocity for obstacle-free ABL
- u t ,v t :
-
u andv at model top
- u aux, andw aux :
-
Intermediate prediction velocities ofu andw without the dynamic pressure perturbation
- u n+1 andw n+1 :
-
Prediction velocities ofu andw at then+1 timestep of model integration
- V :
-
Volume of the spatial averaging process
- x :
-
Horizontal coordinate axis perpendicular to shelterbelt
- x i :
-
i=1, 2, 3-three direction coordinate,x, y, z
- z :
-
Vertical coordinate axis upward
- z 0 :
-
Ground surface roughness length
- β:
-
Weight coefficient for numerical differencing scheme
- γ:
-
Coefficient of air thermal expansion
- ∈:
-
Dissipation rate of turbulence
- ∈ijk :
-
Einstein summation symbol
- ρ0:
-
Air density
- ϑ:
-
Potential-temperature departure from its basic state
- ν:
-
Coefficient of air molecular viscosity
- ‡t :
-
Time step of model integration
- κ:
-
von Karman constant
- ϕ:
-
Macry symbol, standing foru, v, w, E andE1
References
Baines, W. D. and Peterson, E. G.: 1951, ‘An Investigation of Flow Through Screens’,Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 73, 467–480.
Bradley, E. F. and Mulhearn, P. J.: 1983, ‘Development of Velocity and Shear Stress Distributions in the Wake of a Porous Shelter Fence’,J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 15, 145–156.
Caborn, J. M.: 1957, ‘Shelterbelts and Microclimate’,For. Comm. Bull. No. 29, Edinburgh, 129 pp.
Castro, I. P.: 1971, ‘Wake Characteristics of Two-Dimensional Perforated Plates Normal to an Airstream’,J. Fluid Mech. 46, 599–609.
Chang, S. C.: 1966, ‘Velocity Distributions in the Separated Flow behind a Wedge-shaped Model Hill’, Thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, 101 pp.
Chorin, A. J.: 1968, ‘Numerical Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations’,Math. Comp. 23, 341–354.
Counihan, J., Hunt, J. C. R., and Jackson, P. S.: 1974, ‘Wakes Behind Two-Dimensional Surface Obstacles in Turbulent Boundary Layers’,J. Fluid Mech. 64, 529–563.
Finnigan, J. J.: 1985, ‘Turbulent Transport in Flexible Plant Canopies’, in B. A. Hutchison and B. B. Hicks (eds.),The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, pp. 443–480.
Finnigan, J. J. and Bradley, E. F.: 1983, ‘The Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budget Behind a Porous Barrier: an Analysis in Streamline Coordinates’,J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 15, 145–156.
Hagen, L. J. and Skidmore, E. L.: 1971, ‘Turbulent Velocity Fluctuations and Vertical Flow as Affected by Windbreak Porosity’Trans. ASAE 14, 634–637.
Hagen, L. J., Skidmore, E. L., Miller, P. L., and Kipp, J. E.: 1981, ‘Simulation of Effect of Wind Barriers on Airflow’,Trans. ASAE 24, 1002–1008.
Heisler, G. M. and Dewalle, D. R.: 1988, ‘Effects of Windbreak Structure on Wind Flow’,Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23, 41–69.
Hoerner, S. F.: 1965, ‘Fluid Dynamic Drag’, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 64-19666.
Jensen, M.: 1974, ‘The Aerodynamics of Shelter’. In:FAO Report on the FAO/DANIDA Inter-regional Training Center on Heathland and Sand Dune Afforestation. FAO/DEN/TF, 123 pp.
Kaiser, H.: 1959, ‘Die Stromung an Windschutzstreifen’,Ber. Deut. Wetterdiensters 7, 36 pp.
Li, Z., Lin, J. D., and Miller, D. R.: 1989, ‘Air Flow Over and Through a Forest Edge: A Steady-State Numerical Simulation’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 46, 333–354.
McNaughton, K. G.: 1988, ‘Effects of Windbreaks on Turbulent Transport and Microclimate’,Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23, 17–39.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1974, ‘A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers’,J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1791–1806.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development of a Turbulent Closure Model for Geophysical Fluid Problems’,Rev. Geophys. Space Sci. 20, 851–875.
Meyers, T. and Paw U, K. T.: 1986, ‘Testing of A Higher-Order Closure Model for Modeling Airflow Within and Above Plant Canopies’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 37, 297–311.
Miller, D. R., Lin, J. D., and Lu, Z. N.: 1991, ‘Air Flow Across an Alpine Forest Clearing: A Model and Field Measurements’,Agricultural and Forest Meteorol. 56, 209–225.
Naot, O. and Mahrer, Y.: 1991, ‘Two-Dimensional Microclimate Distribution Within and Above a Crop Canopy in an Arid Environment: Modeling and Observational Studies’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 56, 223–244.
Paegle, J., Zdunkowski, W. G., and Welch, R. M.: 1976, ‘Implicit Differencing of Predictive Equations of the Boundary Layer’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 1321–1324.
Perera, M. D. A. S.: 1981, ‘Shelter Behind Two-Dimensional Solid and Porous Fences’,J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 8, 93–104.
Plate, E. J.: 1971, ‘The Aerodynamics of Shelterbelts’,Agricultural Meteorol. 8, 203–222.
Raine, J. K. and Stevenson, D. C.: 1977, ‘Wind Protection by Model Fences in a Simulated Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,J. Indust. Aerodyn. 2, 159–180.
Raupach, M. R. and Shaw, R. H.: 1982, ‘Averaging Procedures for Flow Within Vegetation Canopies’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22, 79–90.
Richards, P. J., Kay, E. F., Russell, D., and Wilson, G. R. C.: 1984, ‘Porous Artificial Windbreaks in Oblique Winds’,Paper 67/84 for IPENZ Conf., Hastings, New Zealand, 10 pp.
Rosenberg, N. J.: 1979, ‘Windbreaks for Reducing Moisture Stress’, in B. J. Barfield and J. F. Gerber (eds.),Modification of Aerial Environment of Plants, ASAE, St Joseph, pp. 538.
Sturrock, J. W.: 1969, ‘Aerodynamics Studies of Shelterbelts in Nealand-1: Low to Medium Height Shelterbelts in Mid-Canterbury’,N. Z. J. Sci. 12,754–776.
Sturrock, J. W.: 1972, ‘Aerodynamics studies of Shelterbelts in Nealand-2: Medium Height to Tall Shelterbelts in Mid-Canterbury’,N. Z. J. Sci. 15, 113–140.
Taylor, P. A.: 1988, ‘Turbulent Wakes in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, in W. L. Steffen and O. T. Denmead (eds.),Flow and Transport in the Natural Environment: Advances and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 270–292.
Thom, A.S.: 1975, ‘Momentum, Mass and Heat Exchange of Plant Communities’,Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Vol. 1, Academic Press, pp. 1–278.
van Eimern, J., Karschon, R., Razumova, L. A., and Robertson, G. W.: 1964, ‘Windbreaks and Shelterbelts’, World Meteorol. Org. Technical Note No, 59, pp. 188.
Wang, H., and Takle, E. S.: 1995, ‘Boundary-Layer Flow and Turbulence Near Porous Obstacles. I. Derivation of a General Equation Set for a Porous Medium’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. (in press).
Whitaker, S.: 1968,Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Whitaker, S.: 1969, ‘Advances in Theory of Fluid Motions in Porous Media’,Ind. Eng. Chem. 61, 14–28.
Whitaker, S.: 1973, ‘The Transport Equations for a Multi-phase System’,Chem. Eng. Sci. 28, 139–147.
Wilson, N. R. and Shaw, R. H.: 1977, ‘A Higher Order Closure Model for Canopy Flow’,J. Applied Meteorol. 16, 1197–1205.
Wilson, J. D.: 1985, ‘Numerical Studies of Flow Through a Windbreak’,J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 21, 119–154.
Wilson, J. D.: 1987, ‘On the Choice of a Windbreak Porosity Profile’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 38, 37–39.
Wilson, J. D.: 1988, ‘A Second-Order Closure Model for Flow Through Vegetation’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 42, 371–392.
Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘A Numerical Model Study of Turbulent Airflow in and above a Forest Canopy’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 60, 438–454.
Yamada, T. and Mellor, G. L.: 1975, ‘A Simulation of the Wangara Atmospheric Boundary Layer Data’,J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 2309–2329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Takle, E.S. A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 75, 141–173 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00721047
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00721047