Abstract
The method for processing perturbed Keplerian systems known today as the linearization was already known in the XVIIIth century; Laplace seems to be the first to have codified it. We reorganize the classical material around the Theorem of the Moving Frame. Concerning Stiefel's own contribution to the question, on the one hand, we abandon the formalism of Matrix Theory to proceed exclusively in the context of quaternion algebra; on the other hand, we explain how, in the hierarchy of hypercomplex systems, both the KS-transformation and the classical projective decomposition emanate by doubling from the Levi-Civita transformation. We propose three ways of stretching out the projective factoring into four-dimensional coordinate transformations, and offer for each of them a canonical extension into the moment space. One of them is due to Ferrándiz; we prove it to be none other than the extension of Burdet's focal transformation by Liouville's technique. In the course of constructing the other two, we examine the complementarity between two classical methods for transforming Hamiltonian systems, on the one hand, Stiefel's method for raising the dimensions of a system by means of weakly canonical extensions, on the other, Liouville's technique of lowering dimensions through a Reduction induced by ignoration of variables.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abad, A., Palacios, M. and Sein-Echaluce, M.: 1991, “An efficient formulation for numerical orbit computation,” inProceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Spacecraft Flight Dynamics, ESOC Darmstadt, 65–72.
Bohlin, K.: 1911, “Note sur le problème des deux corps et sur une intégration nouvelle dans le problème des trois corps,”Bull. Astron. 28, 113–119.
Bond, V. R.: 1985, “A transformation of the two-body problem,”Celes. Mech. 35, 1–7.
Brown, E. W.: 1896,An Introductory Treatise on the Lunar Theory. Cambridge, The University Press.
Brown, E. W. and Shook, C. A.: 1933,Planetary Theory. Cambridge, The University Press.
Burdet, C. A.: 1967, “Regularization of the two-body problem,”Z. angew. Math. Phys. 18, 434–438.
Burdet, C. A.: 1968, “Theory of Kepler motion: The general perturbed two-body problem,”Z. angew. Math. Phys. 19, 345–368.
Burdet, C. A.: 1969, “Le mouvement képlérien et les oscillateurs harmoniques,”J. Reine Angew. Math. 238, 71–84.
Darboux, G.: 1915,Leçons sur la théorie générale des surfaces, Tome I. Paris, Gauthier-Villars.
Deprit, A. and Williams, C. A.: 1991, “The Lissajous transformation. IV. Delaunay and Lissajous variables,”Celes. Mech. 51, 271–280.
Dieudonné, J.: 1955,La géométrie des groupes classiques. Springer-Verlag, Berlin - Göttingen - Heidelberg.
Dickson, L. E.: 1918, “On quaternions and their generalization and the history of the eight square problem,”Ann. Math. 20, 155–171.
Ferrándiz, J. M.: 1986, “Una transformación canónica general que aumenta el número de variables. Aplicación a problemas de dos cuerpos,”Homenaje al profesor D. Rafael Cid, Ed. Vicente Camarena Badia. Universidad de Zaragoza, Secretariado de Publicaciones.
Ferrándiz, J. M.: 1986, “A new set of canonical variables for orbit calculations,” Second International Symposium on Spacecraft Flight Dynamics, European Space AgencySP-255, 361–364.
Ferrándiz, J. M.: 1987, “Extended Canonical Transformations increasing the Number of Variables,” inLong-Term Dynamical Behaviour of Natural and Artificial N-Body Systems, ed. A. E. Roy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 103–110.
Ferrándiz, J. M.: 1988, “A general canonical transformation increasing the number of variables with application to the two-body problem,”Celes. Mech. 41, 343–357.
Fock, V.: 1935, “Wasserstoffatom und nicht-Euklidische Geometrie,”Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdel. Techn. Nauk 2, 169–188.
Fock, V.: 1936, “Zur Theorie des Wasserstoffatoms,”Zeits. Phys. 98, 145–154.
Giacaglia, G. E. O,: 1970, “The Levi-Civita problem and the Kustaanheimo-Stiefel transformation,” Applied Mechanics Research Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, TR1018, 23 pp..
Hurwitz, A.: 1923, “Über die Komposition der quadratischen Formen,”Math. Ann. 88, 1–25.
Iwai, T.: 1985, ‘On reduction of two degrees of freedom Hamiltonian systems by anS 1 action, and 'SO0(1,2) as a dynamical group,”J. Math. Phys. 26, 885–892.
Jezewski, D. J.: 1983, “A noncanonical analytic solution to theJ 2 perturbed two-body problem,”Celes. Mech. 30, 343–362.
Kantor, I. L. and Solodovnikov, A. S.: 1973,Giperkompleksnye Čisla. Moscow, Nauka. Translation under the titleHypercomplex numbers. An elementary introduction to algebras. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1989.
Kurcheeva, I. V.: 1977, “Kustaanheimo-Stiefel regularization and nonclassical canonical transformations,”Celes. Mech. 15, 353–365.
Kustaanheimo, P.: 1964, “Spinor regularization of the Kepler motion,”Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Ser. A73, 7 p..
Kustaanheimo, P. and Stiefel, E.: 1965, “Perturbation theory of Kepler motion based on spinor regularization,”J. Reine Angew. Math. 218, 204–219.
Lambert, D. and Kibler, M.: 1988, “An algebraic and geometric approach to non-bijective quadratic transformations,”J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21, 307–343.
Laplace, P. S.: 1799,Traité de mécanique céleste. Paris, Duprat et Bachelier. Reprinted inCEuvres. Paris, Imprimerie royale, 1843.
Lidov, M. L.: 1982, “Increasing the dimensions of Hamiltonian systems, the KS-transformation, and application of particular integrals,”Kosmicheskie Issledovaniya 20, 163–176.
Meyer, K. R.: 1984, “Scaling Hamiltonian systems,”Siam J. Math. Anal. 15, 877–889.
Milankovich, M.: 1939, “On the applications of vectorial elements in the computation of a planetary perturbation,”Bull. Serbian Acad. Math. Nat. A, no 6.
Moser, J.: 1970, “Regularization of Kepler's problem and the averaging method on a manifold,”Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 23, 609–636.
Musen, P.: 1954, “Special perturbations of the vectorial elements,”A. J. 59, 262–267.
Musen, P.: 1961, “On Strömgren's Method of Special Perturbations,”Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 8, 49–51.
Palacios M., Abad, A., and Elipe, A.: 1991, “An efficient numerical formulation for orbit computation,” inAAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Durango, CO, U.S.A., Paper AAS 91–414, 10 p..
Palacios, M. and Calvo, C.: 1992, “Quaternions and numerical orbit computation,” Rev. Academia de Ciencias, Zaragoza47, 169–181.
Scheifele, G.: 1968, “Verallgemeinerte kanonische Transformationen zur Abbildung von Keplerbewegungen auf harmonische Oszillatoren und zugehörige Störungstheorie,”Dissertation no 4212, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zurich.
Scheifele, G.: 1970, “On nonclassical canonical systems,”Celes. Mech. 2, 296–310.
Stiefel, E.: 1970, “Remarks on numerical integration of Keplerian orbits,”Celes. Mech. 2, 274–281.
Stiefel, E. and Scheifele, G.: 1968, “Régularisation du mouvement képlérien perturbé dans l'espace à trois dimensions par une transformation canonique généralisée,”C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris Série A267, 950–953.
Stiefel, E. and Scheifele, G.: 1971,Linear and Regular Celestial Mechanics. New York Heidelberg Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Velte, W.: 1978, “Concerning the regularizing KS-transformation,”Celes. Mech. 17, 395–403.
Vivarelli, M. D.: 1983, “The KS-transformation in hypercomplex form,”Celes. Mech. 29, 45–50.
Vivarelli, M. D.: 1988, “Geometrical and physical outlook on the cross product of two quaternions,”Celes. Mech. 41, 359–370.
Vivarelli, M. D.: 1991, “On the connection among three classical mechanical problems via the hypercomplex KS-transformation,”Celes. Mech. & Dyn. Astron. 50, 109–124.
Wene, G. P.: 1984, “Algebras with anticommunting basal elements, space-time symmetries and quantum theory,”J. Math. Phys. 25, 414–416.
Wintner, A.: 1947,The Analytical Foundations of Celestial Mechanics, Princeton University Press.
Wolfram, S.: 1991,Mathematica. A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer, Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deprit, A., Elipe, A. & Ferrer, S. Linearization: Laplace vs. Stiefel. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 58, 151–201 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695790
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695790