Abstract
The outcomes of two studies reported here indicate that the teacher inservice workshops, combined with activity-based science lessons, affected students' attitudes and perceptions about electricity. Australian and U.S. studies produced different patterns explored and explained in the paper.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Eccles, J. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In Crawford, M., and Gentry, M. (eds.),Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Galton, M. (1981). Differential treatment of boy and girl pupils during science lessons. In Kelly, A. (Ed.),The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Harlen, W. (1985). Girls and primary school education: Sexism, stereotypes and remedies.Prospects, 15: 541–550.
HRI (Horizon Research, Inc.) (1989).Science and Mathematics Education Briefing Book, Horizon Research, Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Johnson, R. T., and Johnson, D. W. (1987). Cooperative learning and the achievement and socialization crisis in science and math classrooms. In Champagne, A. B., and Horning, L. E. (Eds.),Students and Science Learning, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.
Johnson, S. (1987). Gender differences in science: Parallels in interest, experience and performance.International Journal of Science Education 9: 467–481.
Jones, L. R., Mullis, I. V. S., Raizen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., Weston, E. A. (1992).The 1990 Science Report Card: NAEP's Assessment of Fourth, Eighth, & Twelfth Graders, National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, D.C.
Kahle, J. B. (1985). Retention of girls in science: Case studies of secondary teachers. In Kahle, J. B. (Ed.),Women in Science: A Report from the Field, The Falmer Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kahle, J. B., and Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 131–140.
Kahle, J. B., and Meece, J. (1992). Research on girls in science: Lessons and applications. In Gabel, D. (Ed.),Handbook of Research in Science Teaching and Learning (in press).
Kahle, J. B., Anderson, A., & Damnjanovic, A. (1992). A comparison of elementary teacher attitudes and skills in teaching science in Australia and the United States, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly, A. (1982). Why girls don't do science.New Scientist 94: 497–500.
Linn, M. C., De Benedictis, T., Delucchi, K., Harris, A., and Stage, E. (1987). Gender differences in national assessment of education progress science items: What does “I don't know” really mean?Journal of Research in Science Teaching 14(3): 267–278.
Medrich, E. A., and Griffith, J. E. (1992).International Mathematics & Science Assessments: What Have We Learned? (NCES 92-011). National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C.
McMillan, J. G., and May, M. J. (1979). A study of factors influencing attitudes towards science of junior high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15: 217–222.
Mullis, I. V. S., and Jenkins, L. B. (1988).The Science Report Card: Elements of Risk and Recovery, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.
NRC (National Research Council) (1990).Reshaping School Mathematics: A Philosophy and Framework for Curriculum, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Ormerod, M. B., and Wood, C. (1983). A comparative study of three methods of measuring the attitudes to science of 10- to 11-year-old pupils.European Journal of Science Education 5: 77–86.
Parker, L. H. (1985).Non-Sexist Science Education: An Issue of Primary Concern, paper presented at the Science Teachers Association of Victoria Conference, Monash University, Melborne, Australia.
Rennie, L. J., and Parker, L. H. (1987). Scale dimensionality and population heterogeneity: Potential problems in the interpretation of attitude data.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 567–577.
Rennie, L. J., Parker, L. H., and Hutchinson, P. E. (1985).The Effect of Inservice Training on Teacher Attitudes and Primary School Science Classroom Climates, Research Report No. 12, Department of Education, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Simpson, R. D. (1987). Relating student feelings to achievement in science. In Rowe, M. B. (Ed.),What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 1, National Science Teachers' Association, Washington, D.C.
Stevenson, H. W., and Stigler, J. W. (1992).The Learning Gap, Summit Books, New York.
WCCRW (Wellesley College Center for Research on Women) (1992).How Schools Shortchange Girls, American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This material is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation under grant MDR-88-50570 in the United States and supported by a grant from the Special Projects Program of the Commonwealth Schools Commission in the “Education of GirlsDD section of Projects of National Significance in Australia. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Commonwealth Schools Commission.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kahle, J.B., Rennie, L.J. Ameliorating gender differences in attitudes about science: A cross-national study. J Sci Educ Technol 2, 321–334 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694595
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694595