Abstract
The interplanetary shock wave front shape and intensity are calculated numerically by means of the WKB-approach, with nonlinear effects taken into account. The solar flare is modelled as an isotropic point explosion at the solar wind base. The heliospheric current sheet (HCS) is represented by a radially diverging stream with a higher plasma concentration and a lower wind speed. Fast magnetosonic shock wave propagation along the HCS is connected with the effect of regular accumulation of the wave energy in the vicinity of the HCS. In this place the wave intensity is increased, and the corresponding front fragments go ahead to form a shock-wave forerunner as a ‘pimple’. The ‘primple’, in turn, is located inside a quite a large, but less-contrast, ‘dimple’ in the wave surface. This ‘dimple’ approximately coincides with the HCS stream contours. If the flare is outside the HCS boundaries, the picture discussed above is conserved, but asymmetry effects arise. Thus the interplanetary shock is stronger when the Earth's observer and the flare are on the same side of the HCS and is weaker in the opposite case.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes, A.: 1992,Geophys. Res. 97(A8), 12 105.
Bazer, J. and Fleischman, O.: 1959,Physics Fluids 2, 366.
Berstein, I. B.: 1971,J. Plasma Physics 5, 303.
Bronshtein, I. N. and Semendyaev, K. A.: 1980,Handbook on Mathematics, Nauka, Moscow.
Blokhintsev, D. I.: 1981,Acoustics of an Inhomogeneous Moving Medium, Nauka, Moscow.
Burton, M. E., Siscoe, G. L., and Smith, E. J.: 1992,Geophys. Res. 97(A8), 12 283.
Dryer, M., Wu, S. T., Wu, C. C., and Han, S. M.: 1992,Proceedings of 26th ESLAB Symposium on Study of the Solar-Terrestrial System, Killarney, Ireland (in press).
Eselevich, V. G., Uralova, S. V., and Uralov, A. M.: 1991,Proceedings of the First SOLTIP Symposium, Liblice, Czechoslovakia, Vol. 1, p. 110.
Gubkin, K. E.: 1961, ‘Nonlinear Geometrical Acoustics and Its Applications’, inNekotorye problemy matematiki i mekhaniki, Novosibirsk.
Han, S. M., Wu, S. T., and Dryer, M.: 1988,Computers and Fluids 16, 81.
Kerstenboim, Kh. S., Roslyakov, G. S., and Chudov, L. A.: 1974,The Point Explosion, Nauka, Moscow.
Korn, G. A. and Korn, T. P.: 1968,Mathematical Handbook.
Korobeinikov, V. P.: 1967,Magnitnaya gidrodinamika, No. 2, Zinatne, Riga, p. 25.
Kravtsov, Yu. A. and Orlov, Yu. I.: 1980,Geometrical Optics of Inhomogeneous Media, Nauka, Moscow.
Kulikovsky, A. G. and Lyubimov, G. A.: 1962,Magnetic Hydrodynamics, Moscow.
Uralova, S. V. and Uralov, A. M.: 1990,Plasma Astrophysics, European Space Agency Publ. ESA SP-311, Proceeings of joint Varenna-Abastumani-ESA-Nagoya-Potsdam Workshop, Telavi, Georgia, USSR, p. 99.
Uralov, A. M.: 1982,Magnitnaya gidrodinamika, No. 1, Zinatne, Riga, p. 45.
Watanabe, T.: 1989,Adv. Space Res. 9(4), 99.
Wei, F. and Dryer, M.: 1991,Solar Phys. 132, 373.
Weinberg, S.: 1962,Phys. Rev. 136(6), 1899.
Yakovlev, O. I., Yefimov, A. I., and Rubtsov, S. N.: 1988,Astron. Zh. 65(6), 1290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uralova, S.V., Uralov, A.M. WKB approach to the problem of MHD shock propagation through the heliospheric current sheet. Sol Phys 152, 457–479 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680450
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680450