Abstract
Most recent authors have called the bay mussels of the Pacific coast of North AmericaMytilus edulis Linnaeus, 1758. Thirteen samples ofedulis-like mussels were collected from California, Oregon, and Alaska, USA, in 1985, 1986 and 1987. Electrophoretic evidence from wight loci indicates that these samples consist of two genetically distinct groups, neither of which is similar toM. edulis from the Atlantic Ocean. Mussels in southern California are very similar toM. galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 from the Mediterranean Sea; it is probable thatM. galloprovincialis was introduced accidentally to southern California. Mussels in Oregon and Alaska are similar to those from the Baltic Sea and parts of eastern Canada; the nameM. trossulus Gould, 1850 has priority for this taxon. In central and nothern California,M. galloprovincialis, M. trossulus and their hybrids co-occur. Despite the presence of hybrids betweenM. galloprovincialis andM. trossulus, the genetic integrity which they maintain across large areas of the world warrants their recognition as two distinct species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature cited
Ahmad, M., Beardmore, J. A. (1976). Genetic evidence that the “Padstow mussel” isMytilus galloprovincialis. Mar. Biol. 35: 139–147
Ahmad, M., Skibinski, D. O. F., Beardmore, J. A. (1977). An estimate of the amount of genetic variation in the common musselMytilus edulis. Biochem. Genet. 15: 833–846
Brown, T. (1827). Illustrations of the conchology of Great Britain and Ireland. W. H. Lizars, Edinburgh
Carlton, J. T. (1975). Introduced intertidal invertebrates. In: Smith, R. I., Carlton, J. T. (eds.) Light's manual: intertidal invertebrates of the central California coast. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, p. 17–25
Carpenter, P. P. (1864). Supplementary report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the Mollusca of the west coast of North America. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci. 33: 517–686
Clessin, S. (1889). Mytilidae. In: Schubert, G. H., Wagner, J. A., Küster, H. C. (eds.) Systematisches Conchylien-cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz, Vol. 8 No. 3. Bauer and Raspe, Nürnberg, p. 1–170
Coe, W. R. (1945).Mytilus edulis diegensis, new subspecies. Minut conch. Club Sth. Calif. 48: 28
Coe, W. R. (1946). A resurgent population of the California bay mussel (Mytilus edulis diegensis). J. Morph. 78: 85–104
Conrad, T. A. (1837). Description of new marine shells from upper California, collected by Thomas Nuttall, Esq. J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 7: 227–268
Da Costa, E. M. (1778). Historia naturalis testaceorum Britanniae, or, the British conchology. Published by the author, London
De Kay, J. E. (1843). Natural history of New York, Part 5. Mollusca. Carroll and Cook, Albany
Gosling, E. M. (1984). The systematic status ofMytilus galloprovincialis in western Europe: a review. Malacologia 25: 551–568
Gould, A. A. (1850). Shells from the United States Exploring Expedition. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 3: 343–348
Gould, A. A. (1851). Descriptions of a number of California shells, collected by Maj. William Rich and Lieut. Thomas P. Green, United States Navy. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 4: 87–93
Gould, A. A. (1852). Mollusca and shells. In: United States Exploring Expedition, during the years 1839–1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., Vol. 12. C. Sherman, Philadelphia
Gould, A. A. (1856). Mollusca and shells. Atlas. In: United States Exploring Expedition, during the years 1839–1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., Vol. 12. C. Sherman and Sons, Philadelphia
Gould, A. A. (1862). Otia conchologia: descriptions of shells and mollusks from 1839 to 1862. Gould and Lincoln, Boston
Grant, W. S., Cherry, M. I. (1985).Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. in southern Africa. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 90: 179–191
Holman, F. V. (1910). Oregon counties. Their creations and the origins of their names. Q. Oreg. hist. Soc., W. H. Leeds, Salem, Oregon 11: 1–81
Johnson, R. I. (1949). Jesse Wedgwood Mighels with a bibliography and a catalogue of his species. Oec. Pap. Mollusks Harv. 1: 213–231
Johnson, R. I. (1964). The recent Mollusca of Augustus Addison Gould. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 239: 1–182
Koehn, R. K., Hall, J. G., Innes, D. J., Zera, A. J. (1984). Genetic differentiation ofMytilus edulis in eastern North America. Mar. Biol. 79: 117–126
Koehn, R. K., Milkman, R., Mitton, J. B. (1976). Population genetics of marine pelecypods. IV. Selection, migration and genetic differentiation in the blue musselMytilus edulis. Evolution 30: 2–32
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de (1819). Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Vol. 6. A. S. B. Verdiere Libraire, Paris
Lamy, E. (1936). Revision des Mytilidae vivants du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. J. Conch., Paris 80: 66–102 107–198
Lee, S. Y., Morton, B. (1985). The introduction of the Mediterranean musselMytilus galloprovincialis into Hong Kong. Malac. Rev. 18: 107–109
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. 10th ed. Vol. 1. Regnum animale. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm
Mighels, J. W. (1844). Some specimens of shells, with descriptions. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 1: 187–189
Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283–292
Nichols, E. A., Ruddle, F. H. (1973). A review of enzyme polymorphism, linkage and electrophoretic conditions for mouse and somatic cell hybrids in starch gels. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21: 1066–1081
Orbigny, A. d' (1842). Mollusques lamellibranches. In: Orbigny, A. d' (ed.) Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale 5(3). Bertrand and Levrault, Paris, p. 489–758
Pennant, T. (1777). British zoology. 4th ed. Warrington, London
Rohlf, F. J. (1985). NT-SYS: Numerical taxonomic system of multivariate statistical programs. Technical Report, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York
Scarlato, O. A. (1981). Dvustvorchatje mollyuski vanerennykh shirot zapadnoi chasti Tikhogo oceana [Bivalve mollusks of temperate latitudes of the western portion of the Pacific Ocean]. Opred. Faune SSSR 126: 1–461
Scarlato, O. A., Starobogatov, Ya. I. (1979). Polozhenie v sisteme i rasprostranenie midii [The systematic position and distribution of mussels]. In: Scarlato, O. A. (ed.) Promyslovye dvustvorchatye mollyuski-midii i ikh rol' v ekosistemakh [Commercial bivalve molluscan mussels and their role in the ecosystem]. Zoological Institute of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, p. 106–111
Seed, R. (1968). Factors in influencing shell shape in the musselMytilus edulis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 48: 561–584
Seed, R. (1972). Morphological variations inMytilus from the French coasts in relation in the occurrence and distribution ofm. galloprovincialis Lamarck. Cah. Biol. mar. 13: 357–384
Skibinski, D. O. F. (1983). Natural selection in hybrid mussel populations. In: Oxford, G. S., Rollinson, D. (eds.) Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. Academic Press, London, p. 283–298
Skibinski, D. O. F., Ahmad, M., Beardmore, J. A. (1978). Genetic evidence for naturally occurring hybrids betweenMytilus edulis andMytilus galloprovincialis. Evolution 32: 354–364
Skibinski, D. O. F., Beardmore, J. A., Cross, T. F. (1983). Aspects of the population genetics ofMytilus (Mytilidae; Mollusca) in the British Isles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 19: 137–183
Soot-Ryen, T. (1955). A report on the family Mytilidae (Pelecypoda). Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. 20: 1–175
Suchanek, T. H. (1978). The ecology ofMytilus edulis L. in exposed rocky intertidal communities. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 31: 105–120
Varvio, S.-L., Koehn, R. K., Väinöla, R. (1988). Evolutionary genetics of theMytilus edulis complex in the North Atlantic region. Mar. Biol. 98: 51–60
Wilkins, N. P., Fujino, K., Gosling, E. M. (1983). The Mediterranean musselMytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. in Japan. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20: 365–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. P. Grassle, Woods Hole
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, J.H., Koehn, R.K. The musselsMytilus galloprovincialis andM. trossulus on the Pacific coast of North America. Mar. Biol. 99, 111–118 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00644984
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00644984