Abstract
This study presents evidence which suggests that even though students in grades 6 through 8 are familiar with a variety of types of representation modes, they have great difficulty in successfully communicating spatial information. A Building Description Task, which consists ofa building made up of ten small cubes taped together and a set of instructions, was presented to a sample of middle school children. They were asked to “help your friend to know what your building looks like.” Students' attempts were classified by representation mode (verbal, mixed, graphic) and analyzed by grade and by sex. In addition, the effect of instruction in spatial visualization activities on students' preference for representation mode and rate of success on the task was assessed. The findings were examined relative to the practical teaching implications, to individual differences in spatial visualization ability and to design of spatial tests.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baldy, R.: 1988, ‘From drawing to object space. Analysis of activities connecting objects with their perspective drawings’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 19, 43–57.
Ben-Chaim, D., G. Lappan, and R. T. Houang: 1985, ‘Visualizing rectangular solids made of small cubes: Analyzing and effecting students' performance’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 69, 389–409.
Ben-Chaim, D., G. Lappan, and R. T. Houang: 1986, ‘Development and analysis of a spatial visualization test for middle school boys and girls’,Perceptual and Motor Skills 63, 659–669.
Ben-Chaim, D., G. Lappan, and R. T. Houang: 1988, ‘The effect of instruction on spatial visualization skills of middle school boys and girls’,American Educational Research Journal 25(1), 51–71.
Ben-Chaim, D., G. Lappan, and R. T. Houang: 1989, ‘The role of visualization in the middle school mathematics curriculum’,FOCUS: Learning Problems in Mathematics.
Bishop, A. J.: 1973, ‘Use of structural apparatus and spatial ability: A possible relationship’,Research in Education 9, 43–49.
Bishop, A. J.: 1979, ‘Visualizing and mathematics in a pre-technological culture’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 135–146.
Bishop, A. J.: 1983, ‘Space and geometry’, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds.)Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 175–203.
Blade, M. and W. S. Watson: 1955, ‘Increase in spatial visualization test scores during engineering study’,Psychological Monographs 69(12).
Brinkman, E. H.: 1966, ‘Programmed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization’,Journal of Applied Psychology 50, 179–184.
Burden, L. D. and S. A. Coulson: 1981,Processing of Spatial Tasks, Unpublished master thesis, Monash University.
Burton, L., M. Cooper, and G. Leder: 1986, ‘Representations of three-dimensional figures by mathematics teachers-in-training’, in L. Burton and C. Hoyles (eds.),Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference for the PME, London, pp. 81–86.
Connors, J. M. and L. A. Serbin: 1985, ‘Visual spatial skill: Is it important for mathematics? Can it be taught?’, in S. F. Chipman, L. K. Brush and D. M. Wilson (eds.),Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 151–174.
Connors, J. M., M. Schakman, and L. A. Serbin: 1978, Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test’,Child Development 49, 24–29.
Eliot, J. and J. S. Fralley: 1976, ‘Sex differences in spatial ability,Young Children 31, 487–498.
Fennema, E.: 1977, ‘Influences of selected cognitive, affective and educational variables on sex-related differences in mathematics learning and studying’, in L. H. Fox, E. Fennema and J. Sherman (eds.),Women and Mathematics: Research Perspectives for Change, National Institute of Education, Washington, DC, pp. 79–135.
Fennema, E. and J. Sherman: 1977, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors’,American Educational Research Journal 14, 51–71.
Gaulin, C.: 1985, ‘The need for emphasizing various graphical representations of 3-dimensional shapes and relations’, in L. Streefland (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the PME, Noordwijkehout, The Netherlands, Volume II, pp. 53–71.
Goodnow, J.: 1977,Children's Drawing, Fontana, London.
Guay, R. B.: 1980, ‘Spatial ability measurement: A critique and an alternative’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Harris, L. J.: 1978, ‘Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic and neurological factors’, in M. Kinsborne (ed.),Asymmetrical Functions of the Brain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 405–522.
Harris, L. J.: 1981, ‘Sex-related variations in spatial skill’, in L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, and N. Newcombe (eds.),Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span: Theory and Application, Academic Press, New York, pp. 83–125.
Lappan, G., E. D. Phillips, and M. J. Winter: 1984, ‘Spatial visualization’,Mathematics Teacher 77, 618–623.
Liben, L. S.: 1981, ‘Spatial representation and behavior: Multiple perspective’, in L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, and N. Newcombe (eds.),Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span: Theory and Application, Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–36.
Linn, M. C. and A. C. Petersen: 1985, ‘Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis’,Child Development 56, 1479–1498.
Maccoby, E. E. and C. N. Jacklin: 1974,The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
Mayer, R. E.: 1974, ‘Acquisition processes and resilience under varying testing conditions for structurally different problem-solving procedures’,Journal of Educational Psychology 66, 644–654.
Mendicino, L.: 1958, ‘Mechanical reasoning and space perception: Native capacity of experience’,Personality Guidance Journal 36, 335–338.
McGee, M. G.: 1978, ‘Effects of training and practice on sex differences in Mental Test scores’,Journal of Psychology 100, 87–90.
McGee, M. G.: 1979, ‘Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal and neurological influences’,Psychological Bulletin 5, 889–918.
Mitchelmore, M. C.: 1975, ‘The perceptual development of Jamaican students, with special reference to visualization and drawing of three-dimensional geometrical figures and effects of spatial training’, (Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1974),Dissertation Abstracts International 35, 7310A.
Mitchelmore, M. C.: 1983, ‘3D drawings and the parallel concept’, in R. Hershkowitz (ed.),Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the PME, Jerusalem, Israel, pp. 40–44.
Mundy, J. F.: 1987, ‘Spatial training for calculus students: Sex differences in achievement and in visualization ability’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 18, 126–140.
Myers, C. T.: 1958,The Effects of Training in Mechanical Drawing on Spatial Relations Test Scores as Predictors of Engineering Drawing Grades, ETS Research Bulletin 58-4, Educational Testing Service, March, 1958, Princeton, N.J.
Parzysz, B.: 1988, ‘“Knowing” vs. “Seeing”. Problems of the plane representation of space geometry figures’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 19, 79–92.
Richardson, A.: 1977, ‘Verbalizer, visualizer, a cognitive style dimension’,Journal of Mental Imagery 1, 109–126.
Sedgwick, L. K.: 1961,The Effect of Spatial Perception of Instruction in Descriptive Geometry, Masters thesis, Southern Illinois University.
Sherman, J. A.: 1967, ‘Problems of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning’,Psychological Review 741, 290–299.
Sherman, J. A.: 1979,Women and Mathematics: Summary of Research from 1977–1979, NIE grant, Unpublished manuscript.
Smith, I. M.: 1964,Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance, University of London, London.
Smith, W. S. and C. K. Schroeder: 1979, ‘Instruction of fourth grade girls and boys on spatial visualization’,Science Education 63, 61–66.
Wattanawaha, N. and M. A. Clements: 1982, ‘Qualitative aspects of sex-related differences in performance on pencil-and-paper spatial questions, grades 7–9’,Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 878–887.
Willis, S.: 1980, ‘Spatial ability: Some neurological research’, in K. Milton (ed.),Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 183–197.
Winter, M. J., G. Lappan, E. Phillips, and W. Fitzgerald: 1986,Spatial Visualization-Middle Grades Mathematics Project, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G. & Houang, R.T. Adolescents' ability to communicate spatial information: Analyzing and effecting students' performance. Educ Stud Math 20, 121–146 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579459
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579459