Abstract
By considering the observed hardness anisotropies of two different materials (001) single-crystal MgO and an aligned Al-CuAl2 eutectic), this paper discusses some of the factors controlling the shapes and sizes of microhardness indentations. Both Vickers and Knoop profile indenters have been used. In the Vickers case, the responses of differing materials along symmetrically equivalent indenter diagonals have been observed while, in the Knoop case, indentations were often observed to have width∶length ratios different from that of the indenter. The observed behaviour has been interpreted in terms of differential elastic recovery on withdrawal of the indenter, and of changes in surface topography resulting from the accommodation of material displaced from the indentation (e.g. pile-up). It is demonstrated that both effects can seriously affect the sizes and shapes of hardness impressions. Further, these “extrinsic” effects are superimposed upon the “intrinsic” mechanical response and anisotropy of the test material itself. Thus, measured hardness anisotropies are a superposition of a number of effects, each important in its own right and each with its own anisotropy. Approaches have been devised which attempt to separate these extrinsic and intrinsic components of the observed hardness response. The results allow some important conclusions to be drawn concerning the interpretation of hardness values and hardness anisotropies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
“The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973).
D. Tabor, “The Hardness of Metals” (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1951).
D. Tabor,Rev. Phys. Technol. 1 (1970) 145.
C. A. Brookes, J. B. O'Neill andB. A. W. Redfern,Proc. R. Soc. (London) A322 (1971) 73.
B. C. Wonsiewicz andG. Y. Chin, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 167
R. W. Armstrong andA. C. Raghuram, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 174.
P. M. Sargent, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (1979).
D. M. Marsh,Proc. R. Soc. (London) A279 (1964) 420.
C. A. Brookes, R. P. Burnand andJ. E. Morgan,J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 2177.
A. G. Atkins, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 223.
P. M. Sargent andT. F. Page,Scr. Metall. 15 (1981) 245.
P. M. Sargent andP. Donovan,ibid. 16 (1982) 1207.
N. H. Macmillan, in “Surface Effects in Crystal Plasticity”, edited by R. M. Latanison and J. J. Fourie, NATO Advanced Study Institute Series E (Applied Science) No. 17 (1977) p. 629.
W. W. Walker, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 258.
D. Newey, M. A. Wilkins andH. M. Pollock,J. Phys. E 15 (1982) 119.
A. R. C. Westwood, J. S. Ahearn andJ. J. Mills,Colloids Surf. 2 (1981) 1.
C. J. Studman, M. A. Moore andS. E. Jones,J. Phys. D 10 (1977) 949.
E. Yoffe,Phil. Mag. 46A (1982) 617.
M. G. S. Naylor andT. F. Page,J. Microsc. 130 (1983) 345.
B. R. Lawn andR. Wilshaw,J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 1064.
T. F. Page, G. R. Sawyer, O. O. Adewoye andJ. J. Wert,Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc. 26 (1978) 193.
B. R. Lawn, A. G. Evans andD. B. Marshall,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 63 (1980) 574.
G. R. Sawyer, P. M. Sargent andT. F. Page,J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 1001.
C. A. Brookes andR. P. Burnand, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 257.
H. Buckle, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 453.
R. W. Armstrong andC. Cm. Wu,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 61 (1978) 102.
P. J. Blau,Scr. Metall. 13 (1979) 95.
Idem, ibid. 14 (1980) 719.
M. A. Velednitskaya, V. N. Rozhanskii, L. F. Comolova, G. V. Saparin, J. Schreiber andO. Brummer,Phys. Status Solidi A32 (1975) 123.
R. D. Arnell,J. Phys. D 7 (1974) 1225.
Y. S. Boyarskaya, D. Z. Grabko andE. I. Purich,J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 939.
G. W. Groves andA. Kelly,Phil. Mag. 8 (1963) 877.
D. G. Rickerby,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 62 (1979) 222.
D. Lee, in “The Science of Hardness Testing and its Research Applications” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1973) p. 147.
D. B. Marshall, T. Noma andA. G. Evans,Comm. Amer. Ceram. Soc. C-176 65 (1982).
I. C. Leigh andG. N. Peggs, National Physical Laboratory Report MOM 47 (NPL, Teddington, UK, 1980).
C. T. Young andS. K. Rhee,ASTM J. Test. Eval. 6 (1978) 221.
Specimen from the work of D. C. Tidy and G. A. Chadwick, Dept. of Metallurgy and Materials Science, University of Cambridge (1967); see D. C. Tidy, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (1970).
P. M. Sargent andT. F. Page,Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc. 26 (1978) 209.
M. A. Moore, PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (1974)
A. C. Raghuram andR. W. Armstrong,J. Less Common Met. 22 (1970) 239.
F. W. Crossman, A. S. Yue andA. E. Vidoz,Trans. AIME 245 (1969) 397.
F. Giberteau, A. Dominguez-Rodriguez, R. Marquez andJ. Castaing,Rev. Phys. Appl. 17 (1982) 777.
S. G. Roberts andT. F. Page,J. Microsc. 124 (1981) 77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sargent, P.M., Page, T.F. Factors affecting the measurement of hardness and hardness anisotropy. J Mater Sci 20, 2388–2398 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00556068
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00556068