Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis performed by fetal ultrasound scan is now a routine part of antenatal care in many countries. That an increasing number of fetal anomalies may be detected on prenatal ultrasound is beyond doubt. However what is theoretically possible is not, always done in practice specially when gastrointestinal atresias (GIA) are concerned and when whole antenatal populations are screened rather than high risk groups. Thanks to our registry of congenital anomalies a retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the prenatal detection of GIA by ultrasound scan in 118,265 consecutive pregnancies of known outcome. Only 31 out of 129 malformed fetuses with GIA were detected (24.0%). The sensitivity of detection varied from 51.4% for atresia of the small intestine to 24.2% for esophageal atresia and 8.2% for ano-rectal atresia. No isolated case with esophageal atresia and ano-rectal atresia were diagnosed. Our results stress the need to perform scans at ≥ 18 weeks gestation and to train sonographers in order to improve prenatal detection of GIA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sollie EJ, van Geijn HP, Artz NFT. Validity of a selective policy for ultrasound examination of fetal congenital anomalies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1988; 27: 125–132.
Constantine G, McCormack J. Comparative audit of booking and mid-trimester ultrasound scans in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis 1991; 11: 905–914.
Campbell S, Pearce JM. The prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies by ultrasound. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1983; 10: 475–506.
Chitty LS, Hung GH, Moore J, Lobb MO. Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br Med J 1991; 303: 1165–1169.
Hill LM, Breckle R, Gehrking WC. Prenatal detection of congenital malformations by ultrasonography: Mayo clinic experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 44–50.
Lennox CE, Carter D, Patel NB. Ultrasound screening in the mid-trimester of pregnancy: The identification of multiple pregnancy, fetal abnormality and pregnancies resulting in mid-trimester loss. J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 9: 87–89.
Rosendahl H, Kivinen S. Antenatal detection of congenital malformations by routine ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 947–951.
Baronciani D, Scaglia C, Corchia C, et al. Ultrasonography in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities: Screening or diagnostic tests? IPIMC 1986–1990 register data. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 1101–1108.
Goncalves LF, Jeanty P, Piper JM. The accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting congenital anomalies, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1606–1612.
Crane JP, Lefevre ML, Winborn NC, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screeining: Impact on the detection, management and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 392–399.
Lys F, de Walls P, Borlee-Grimee I, et al. Evaluation of routine ultrasound examination for the prenatal diagnosis of malformation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 30: 101–109.
Macquart-Moulin G, Julian C, Chapel F, Ayme S. Sensitivity of obstetrical ultrasonography in the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal abnormalities. Rev Epidemiol Med See Santé Publique 1989; 37: 197–205.
Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, et al. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis by a registry of congenital anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis 1992; 12: 263–270.
Anderson N, Boswell O, Duff G. Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: Results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series. AJR 1995; 165: 943–950.
Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalaianen O, Ylöstalo P, et al. Fetal anomalies in a controlled one-stageultrasound screening trial. A report from the Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. J Perinat Med 1994; 22: 279–289.
Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps JP, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: The Belgian multicentric study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991; 1: 102–110.
Stoll C, Roth MP. The north-eastern France birth defects monitoring system. In: Marois M. (ed), Prevention of physical and mental congenital defects, Part B. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1985: 157–162.
Stoll C, Dott B, Alembik Y, Roth MP. Evaluation of routine prenatal diagnosis by a registry of congenital anomalies. Prenat. Diagn. 1955; 15: 791–800.
SAS/STAT. Guide for Personal Computers, version 8 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1989.
Hobbins JC, Grannum Pat, Berkowits RL, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 331–345.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ. Antenatal evaluation and management of ultrasonically detected fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 640–660.
Levi S, Crouzet P, Schaaps JP, et al. Ultrasound screening for fetal malformations. The Lancet 1989; 1: 678.
Brocks V, Bang J. Routine examination by ultrasound for the detection of fetal malformations in a low risk population. Fetal Diagn Ther 1991; 6: 37–45.
Luck CA. Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: A four year study of 8,849 deliveries. Br Med J 1992; 304: 1474–1478.
Nelson LH, Clark CE, Fishburne JI. Value of serial sonography in the in utero detection of duodenal atresia. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 657.
Bovicelli L, Rizzo N, Orsini LF. Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal gastrointestinal abnormalities. Semin Perinatol 1983; 7: 109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoll, C., Alembik, Y., Dott, B. et al. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital gastro-intestinal atresias. Eur J Epidemiol 12, 611–616 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499460
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499460