Summary
There is quite wide-spread agreement about the relevance of pattern Pragnanz (Koffka, 1935) with respect to the human interpretation of visual patterns. There is less agreement about whether pattern Pragnanz is based solely on pattern information (static) or also on the history of the perceiver (dynamic). In Van Leeuwen and Van den Hof (1991), experimental data concerning serial patterns are presented within the framework of the dynamic-network approach initiated by Buffart (1986, 1987). These experimental data are claimed to give evidence against the static-coding approach initiated by Leeuwenberg (1969, 1971). In the present paper, however, I show first that Buffart's theoretical basis is incorrect, and that in fact Leeuwenberg's static-coding approach is the basis for the dynamic-network approach. Second, I show that those experimental data rather give evidence in favor of the static-coding approach, by using those same data for a test of the most recent static-coding model (Van der Helm & Leeuwenberg, 1991; Van der Helm, Van Lier, & Leeuwenberg, 1992). Finally, I propose a reconciliation between the two approaches, in the sense that the dynamic-network model could be shaped in such a way that it yields a simulation, and maybe even an enrichment, of the static-coding model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boselie, F., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1985). Birkhoff revisited: Beauty as a function of effect and means. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 1–39.
Buffart, H. F. J. M. (1986). Gestalt qualities, memory structure, and minimum principles. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Symposium in memoriam Hermann Ebbinghaus (pp. 189–204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Buffart, H. F. J. M. (1987). Seven minus two and structural operations. In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 117–149). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Buffart, H. F. J. M., Leeuwenberg, E. L. J., & Restle, F. (1981). Coding theory of visual pattern completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 241–274.
Collard, R. F. A., & Buffart, H. F. J. M. (1983). Minimization of structural information: A set-theoretical approach. Pattern Recognition, 16, 231–242.
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271.
Goebel, R. (1990). Binding, episodic short-term memory, and selective attention, or why are PDP models poor at symbol manipulation? In D. Touretzky, J. Elman, T. Sejnowski, & G. Hinton (Eds.), Connectionist models, proceedings of the 1990 summer school. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
Hatfield, G. C., & Epstein, W. (1985). The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 155–186.
Helm, P. A. van der (1988). Accessibility and simplicity of visual structures. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helm, P. A. van der, & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1986). Avoiding explosive search in automatic selection of simplest pattern codes. Pattern Recognition, 19, 181–191.
Helm, P. A. van der, & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1991). Accessibility, a criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual pattern codes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 151–213.
Helm, P. A. van der, Lier, R. J. van, & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1992). Serial pattern complexity: irregularity and hiearchy. Perception, 21, 517–544.
Hochberg, J. E., & McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figural “goodness”. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 361–364.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology (1962). 5th ed., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Leeuwen, C. van, Buffart, H., & Vegt, J. van der (1988). Sequence influence on the organization of meaningless serial stimuli: Economy after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 481–502.
Leeuwen, C. van, & Hof, M. van den (1991). What has happened to Prägnanz? Coding, stability, or resonance. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 435–448.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1969). Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 76, 216–220.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 307–349.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J., & Buffart, H. F. J. M. (1984). The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory. Acta Psychologica, 55, 249–272.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J., Mens, L., & Calis, G. (1985). Knowledge within perception: Masking caused by incompatible interpretations. Acta Psychologica, 59, 91–102.
Lier, R. J. van, Helm, P A. van der, & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1993). Integrating global and local aspects of visual occlusion. Submitted.
Mellink, H., & Buffart, H. (1987). Abstract code network as a model of perceptual memory. Pattern Recognition, 20, 143–151.
Mens, L. (1988). Primary perception of stimulus structure. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mens, L., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1988). Hidden Figures are ever present. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 561–571.
Rock, I. (1985). Perception and knowledge. Acta Psychologica, 59, 3–22.
Simon, H. A. (1972). Complexity and the representation of patterned sequences of symbols. Psychological Review, 79, 369–382.
Vegt, J. van der, Buffart, H., & Leeuwen, C. van (1989). The “structural memory”: A network model for human perception of serial objects. Psychological Research, 50, 211–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Helm, P.A. The dynamics of Prägnanz. Psychol. Res 56, 224–236 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419653
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419653