Summary
This study examines the hypothesis that intersexual differences in habitat use by small mammals is an adaptive strategy. Specifically, I evaluate the occurrence of sexual differences in habitat by Peromyscus and Microtus, and test possible adaptive mechanisms which may lead to such differences.
White-footed mice and meadow voles were live-trapped and microhabitat quantified in four habitats. Sexual differences in microhabitat use were found in three of 12 comparisons. These differences may be related to density dependent resource subdivision and habitat heterogencity, but neither of these can account completely for the observed patterns. Sexual differences in habitat do not appear to be an evolutionary strategy maximizing reproductive effort by females, or reducing predation. These sexual differences may reduce intraspecific resource overlap, or may simply reflect reproductive constraints limiting female habitat use to suitable nesting areas.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bendell JF (1961) Some factors affecting the habitat selection of the white-footed mouse. Can Field-Nat 75:244–255
Bowers MA, Smith HD (1979) Differential habitat utilization by sexes of the deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Ecology 60:869–875
Hespenheide HA (1973) Ecological inferences from morphological data. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:213–229
Hespenheide HA (1975) Prey characteristics and predator niche width. In: Ecology and evolution of communities. Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Belknap Press, Cambridge pp 158–180
Kim J (1975) Factor analysis. In: Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd edition Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (eds) McGraw-Hill, New York pp 468–514
Klecka WR (1975) Discriminant analysis. In: Statistical package for the social sciences, 2nd edition Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenking JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (eds), McGraw-Hill, New York pp 434–467
M'Closkey RT (1975) Habitat dimensions of white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Am Mid Nat 93:158–167
M'Closkey RT (1976) Use of artificial microhabitats by white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Am Mid Nat 96:467–470
Metzgar LH (1971) Behavioral population regulation in the woodmouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Am Mid Nat 83:434–447
Morris DW (1979) Microhabitat utilization and species distribution of sympatric small mammals in southwestern Ontario. Am Mid Nat 101:373–384
Morris DW (1980) The pattern and structure of habitat utilization in temperate small mammals. Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary
Morris DW (1984) Patterns and scale of habitat use in two temperate-zone small mammal faunas: Can J Zool 62:(in press)
Morse DH (1968) A quantiative study of foraging of male and female spruce-woods warblers. Ecology 49:779–784
Morse DH (1980) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Robins JD (1971) Differential niche utilization in a grassland sparrow. Ecology 52:1065–1070
Rosenzweig ML (1974) On the evolution of habitat selection. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology 401–404
Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335
Schoener TW (1965) The evolution of bill size differences among sympatric congeneric species of birds. Evolution 19:189–213
Schoener TW (1967) The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in the lizard Anolis consperus. Science 155:474–477
Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726
Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39
Schoener TW (1977) Competition and the niche. In: Biology of the reptilia. Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds) Academic Press, New York pp 35–136
Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edition. Freeman, San Francisco
Storer RW (1966) Sexual dimorphism and food habits in three North American accipiters. Auk 83:423–436
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual selection and the descent of man. Campbell B (ed), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago pp 136–179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, D.W. Sexual differences in habitat use by small mammals: evolutionary strategy or reproductive constraint?. Oecologia 65, 51–57 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384462
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384462