Summary
The spatial patterns and diets of three desert ant species were examined. The results indicate that food competition may account for the spatial arrangement of these species, and that only intraspecific interactions may be required. Each ant species was significantly overdispersed, and the average intraspecific nearest neighbor distances were greater than the interspecific nearest neighbor distances. A test of pairwise spatial arrangment showed that all three species pairs were aggregated interspecifically. The level of the interspecific aggregation was related to the diet similarity of the species. The two species pairs with the lowest diet overlaps were significantly aggregated, and the species pair with the most similar diets was not significantly aggregated. Pairwise dietary overlaps between colonies showed that average intraspecific overlaps were significantly greater than interspecific diet overlaps. Furthermore, the diet overlap was significantly positively correlated to the mean nearest neighbor distance for the three intraspecific and three interspecific comparisons. These data indicate competition for food, especially within species, may be regulating the intercolony distances of these ant species. A computer simulation tested whether only intraspecific territoriality is necessary to produce the observed nearest neighbor distances. A simulation that placed colonies randomly on a patch confirmed that these colonies are intraspecifically overdispersed. By adding intraspecific territoriality, the simulation nearest neighbor distances fit the empirical data reasonably well. Thus interspecific competitive interactions seem unnecessary to account for the spatial arrangement of these species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bray JR (1956) A study of mutual occurrence of plant species. Ecology 37:21–28
Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453
Gilpin ME (1975) Limit cycles in competition communities. Am Nat 109:51–60
Elmes GW (1974) The spatial distribution of a population of two and species living in limestone grassland. Pedobiologia 14:412–418
Holldobler B (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:310–314
Huey RB, Pianka ER, Pimm SL (1983) Temporal separation of activity and interspecific dietary overlap. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard Ecology, Studies of a Model Organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 281–296
May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Meagher TR, Burdick DS (1980) The use of nearest neighbor frequency analyses in studies of association. Ecology 61:1253–1255
Pianka EI (1974) Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2141–2145
Pielou EC (1961) Segregation and symmetry in two-species populations as studied by nearest-neighbor relationship. J Ecol 49:255–269
Ryti RT, Case TJ (1984) Overdispersion of ant colonies. Evidence of competition? (In prep)
Strobeck C (1973) N species competition. Ecology 54:650–654
Tevis L Jr (1958) Interrelations between the harvester ant Veromessor pergandei (Mayr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology 39:695–704
Wheeler GC, Wheeler J (1973) Ants of Deep Canyon. University of California, Riverside
Yeaton RI, Cody ML (1976) Competition and spacing in plant communities: The Northern Mohave Desert. J Ecol 49:255–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryti, R.T., Case, T.J. Spatial arrangement and diet overlap between colonies of desert ants. Oecologia 62, 401–404 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384274
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384274