Summary
We tested, through field experiments and simulation models, the hypothesis that fruit-searching tephritid fruit flies adjust their within-tree search persistence according to the sequence and timing of encounters with parasitized (i.e. egg-infested) and unparasitized Crataegus sp. host fruit. In the field, we presented flies with 4 different sequences of unparasitized [=C] and parasitized [=M] fruit: 5M+0C; 1C+5M; 5M+1C, 1C+0M. Following fruit presentation, flies were permitted to forage freely within trees, which harboured no fruit, until emigration occurred. Under these conditions, flies that encountered the aforementioned different sequences of hosts, displayed differences in Giving Up Time, measured as active foraging time and number of leaf visits, in a manner predicted prior to testing. These differences were, however, not statistically significant. Based upon the results described above, we then built 3 simulation models that predicted within-tree Giving Up Times for individual flies: Model 1-Giving Up Time is incremented and decremented by fixed amounts following encounters by the fly with suitable (i.e. for oviposition) and unsuitable hosts, respectively; Model 2-similar to Model 1, but increment and decrement values are variable and are dependent upon the time since previous encounters by the fly with suitable and unsuitable hosts; Model 3-Giving Up Time is fixed. Comparison with previously reported field data for tephritid flies showed that Model 2 predicted rather well, and significantly better than Models 1 and 3, Giving Up Time for wild type tephritid flies under seminatural field conditions. We discuss our results in light of contemporary foraging theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alphen JJM (1980) Aspects of the foraging Tetrastichus asparagi Crawford and Tetrastichus sp., gregarious egg parasitoids of the asparagus beetles Crioceris asparagi and C. duodecimpunctata. I. Host-species selection, host-stage seldction and host discrimination. Neth J Zool 30:307–325
Bond AB (1980) Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: the search mechanism of the green lacewing. Anim Behav 28:10–19
Elkinton JS, Roitberg BD, Prokopy RJ (1984) Intratree foraging behaviour by tephritid fruit flies: A simulation model. (In prep)
Gibb JA (1962) L. Tinbergen's hypothesis on the role of specific search images. Ibis 104:106–111
Hassell MP (1978) Dynamics of Arthropod Predator Prey Systems. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton
Hassell MP, May RM (1974) Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J Anim Ecol 43:567–594
Iwasa Y, Higashi M, Yamamura N (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am Nat 6:710–723
Krebs JR (1973) Behavioral aspects of predation. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in Ethology. Plenum Press
Morrison G, Lewis J (1981) Allocation of searching time by Trichogramma pretiosum in host-containing patches. Ent exp Appl 30:31–39
Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:2–132
Palumbo DJ (1969) Statistics in Political and Behavioral Science. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Price PW (1977) General concepts on the evolutionary biology of parasites. Evol 31:405–420
Prokopy RJ (1972) Evidence for a pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies. Environ Ent 1:326–332
Rissing SW (1982) Foraging velocity of seed-harvestor ants, Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Environ Ent 11:905–907
Roitberg BD (1981) Foraging behaviour of Rhagoletis pomonella, a parasite of Crateagus. PhD thesis, Univ Mass
Roitberg BD, Prokopy RJ (1981) Experience required for pheromone recognition in the apple maggot fly. Nature 292:540–541
Roitberg BD, Prokopy RJ (1982) Influence of intertree distance on foraging by Rhagoletis pomonella females in the field. Ecol Ent 7:437–442
Roitberg BD, Prokopy RJ (1983) Host deprivation influence on response of Rhagoletis pomonella to its oviposition deterring pheromone. Phys Ent 8:69–72
Roitberg BD, Lenteren JC van, Alphen JJM van, Galis F, Prokopy RJ (1982a) Foraging behaviour of Rhagoletis pomonella, a parasite of hawthorn (Crataegus viridis), in nature. J Anim Ecol 51:307–325
Roitberg BD, Elkinton JS, Prokopy RJ (1982b) Foraging behaviour of Rhagoletis pomonella: a model for fruit parasites. In: Minks AK, Visser JH (eds) Insect-Plant Relationships. PUDOC, Wageningen
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco
Waage JK (1979) Foraging for patchily distributed hosts by the parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. J Anim Ecol 48:353–371
Ydenberg R (1984) Great Tits use a giving up time. Behaviour (Submitted)
Zach R, Smith JMN (1981) Optimal foraging in wild birds? In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD (eds) Foraging behaviour. Garland Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roitberg, B.D., Prokopy, R.J. Host visitation sequence as a determinant of search persistence in fruit parasitic tephritid flies. Oecologia 62, 7–12 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377365
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377365