Summary
It is argued that an appropriate model for the evolution of sexual investment, at least in higher vertebrates, may be as follows. The primary sex ratio is fixed at unity, parents can recognise the sex of individual offspring, and the returns (in offspring fitness) are different for the two sexes. For this model, it is shown that it is evolutionarily stable to invest differently in sons and daughters. In particular:
-
i)
If for a given investment the probability of survival is lower for one sex, selection favours greater investment in that sex.
-
ii)
If one sex has a frequency-dependent component of fitness, such that individuals receiving a greater-than-average investment are fitter, selection favours greater investment in that sex.
-
iii)
If the sex of an offspring can be recognised after an investment d, it may be evolutionarily stable to invest only in some fraction r of the more expensive sex, and to abandon a fraction (1-r). However, such behaviour can evolve only if d is a small fraction of the total investment required per offspring.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Charnov EL (1979) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. Am Nat 113:465–480
Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165
Clutton-Brock TE, Guinness FE, Albon SD (to be published) Parental investment in male and female offspring in a polygamous mammal.
Dittus WPJ (1979) The evolution of behaviour regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population. Behaviour 69:265–302
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488
Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Weir JA (1962) Hereditary and environmental influences on the sex ratio of PHH and PHL mice. Genetics 47:881–897
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, J.M. A new theory of sexual investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7, 247–251 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299371
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299371