Summary
Social behavior of yellow-bellied marmots was observed for three years in colonies where kinship was known and for one year in a high elevation colony where harems were contiguous. Social dynamics of yellow-bellied marmots is dependent on kinship, group composition, and age-sex classes. This pattern is a consequence of the reproductive strategies of males and females. Females behave cohesively toward sisters or daughters, but not with sons and agonistically toward other females. Males generally behave amicably toward females and agonistically toward males, including their sons. Thus, reproductive strategies limit nepotism. This behavior is consistent with a population process in which sons typically disperse as yearlings. At least some of the variation in the expected patterns of social behaviors is attributable to individual differences. Because male and female reproductive strategies differ, a marmot population consists of two social subsystems. The female unit is the closely-related kin group which may also be a burrow group. The male unit is a harem which usually consists of two or more competing female kin groups.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383
Altmann SA, Altmann J (1977) On the analysis of the rates of behavior. Anim Behav 25:364–372
Armitage KB (1962) Social behaviour of a colony of the yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 10:319–331
Armitage KB (1965) Vernal behaviour of the yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 13:59–68
Armitage KB (1973) Population changes and social behavior following colonization by the yellow-bellied marmot. J Mammal 54:842–854
Armitage KB (1974) Male behaviour and territoriality in the yellow-bellied marmot. J Zool 197:233–265
Armitage KB (1975) Social behavior and population dynamics of marmots. Oikos 26:341–354
Armitage KB (1977) Social variety in the yellow-bellied marmot: a population-behavioural system. Anim Behav 25:585–593
Armitage KB (1981) Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecologia (Berl), 48:36–49
Armitage KB, Downhower JF (1974) Demography of yellow-bellied marmot populations. Ecology 55:1233–1245
Armitage KB, Downhower JF, Svendsen GE (1976) Seasonal changes in weights of marmots. Am Midl Nat 96:36–51
Bekoff M (1977) Mammalian dispersal and the ontogeny of individual behavioral phenotypes. Am Nat 111:715–732
Charnov EL, Finerty JP (1980) Vole population cycles: a case for kin-selection? Oecologia (Berl) 45:1–2
Crook JH, Coss-Custard JD (1972) Social ethology. Annu Rev Psychol 23:277–312
Crook JH, Ellis JE, Goss-Custard JD (1976) Mammalian social systems; structure and function. Anim Behav 24:261–275
Downhower JF, Armitage KB (1971) The yellow-bellied marmot and the evolution of polygamy. Am Nat 105:355–370
Downhower JF, Armitage KB (1981) Dispersal of yearling yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 29:1064–1069
Gaines MS, McClenaghan LR Jr (1980) Dispersal in small mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:163–196
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical theory of social behavior I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hoogland JL (1979) Aggression, ectoparasitism, and other possible costs of prairie dog (Sciuridae, Cynomys spp.) coloniality. Behaviour 69:1–35
Hoogland JL, Sherman PW (1976) Advantages and disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality. Ecol Monogr 46:33–58
Johns DW, Armitage KB (1979) Behavioral ecology of alpine yellow-bellied marmots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:133–157
Krebs CJ (1978) A review of the Chitty Hypothesis of population regulation. Can J Zool 56:2463–2480
Lidicker WZ Jr (1975) The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In: Golley FB, Petrusewicz K, Ryszkowski L (eds) Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 103–128
Lomnicki A (1980) Group selection and self-regulation in animal populations. Polish J Ecol 28:543–555
Michener GR (1974) Development of adult-young identification in Richardson's ground squirrel. Dev Psychobiol 7:375–384
Nowicki S, Armitage KB (1979) Behavior of juvenile yellow-bellied marmots: play and social integration. Z Tierpsychol 51:85–105
Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (1980) Why is altruism towards kin so rare? Z Tierpsychol 54:381–387
Schwartz OA, Armitage KB (1980) Genetic variation in social mammals: the marmot model. Science 207:665–667
Sherman PW (1980a) The meaning of nepotism. Am Nat 116:604–606
Sherman PW (1980b) The limits of ground squirrel nepotism. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview, Boulder, Colorado, pp 505–544
Sherman PW (1981) Kinship, demography, and Belding's ground squirrel nepotism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:251–259
Svendsen GE (1974) Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot population. Ecology 55:760–771
Svendsen GE, Armitage KB (1973) An application of mirror-image stimulation to field behavioral studies. Ecology 54:623–627
Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57
Watson A, Moss R (1970) Dominance, spacing behaviour, and aggression in relation to population limitation in vertebrates. Br Ecol Soc Symp 10:167–220
West Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33
Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armitage, K.B., Johns, D.W. Kinship, reproductive strategies and social dynamics of yellow-bellied marmots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11, 55–63 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297667
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297667