Abstract
Two investigations examined how occupational stereotypes relate to sex discrimination in the prestige and salaries accorded to “men's” and “women's” jobs, and in hiring decisions. A distinction was drawn between the sex type of jobs (the ratio of male to female jobholders) and the gender type of jobs (the personality traits associated with jobholders). A descriptive study revealed that although the sex type and gender type of most jobs studied were consistent, significant exceptions occurred. Furthermore, most jobs that were “sex neutral” with respect to sex ratios were found to be highly gender typed. Regression analyses revealed that the “masculinity” of a job was a strong predictor of occupational salary and prestige, whereas feminine traits made a much smaller contribution to prestige and were unrelated to salary. The percentage of women jobholders was negatively related to occupational salary, but unrelated to prestige. Finally, a survey of career planning and placement professionals—who rated the suitability of job applicants whose sex and gender type were varied—demonstrated that two processes underlie sex discrimination in hiring decisions: gender-typed personality trait matching and sex matching of applicants to jobs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
Beyard-Tyler, K., & Haring, M. J. (1984). Gender-related aspects of occupational prestige. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 24, 194–203.
Bose, C. E., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Gender and jobs: Prestige standing of occupations as affected by gender. American Sociological Review, 48, 316–330.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.
Brown, R. (1986). Social Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301–307.
Chafetz, J. S. (1990). Gender equity: An integrated theory of stability and change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cohen, S. C., & Bunker, K. A. (1975). Subtle effects of sex-role stereotypes on recruiters' hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 566–572.
Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fleishman, E. A. (1967). Performance assessment based on an empirically derived task taxonomy. Human Factors, 9, 349–366.
Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178–186.
Goldberg, M. P. (1972). Women in Soviet economy. The review of radical political economics, 4, 60–74.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545–579.
Gottfredson, L. S., & Brown, V. (1978). Holland codes for the 1960 and 1970 census: Detailed occupational titles. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 22.
Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1978). Effects of changing proportions of the sexes on ratings of occupational prestige. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 314–322.
Jacobs, J. A., & Powell, B. (1985). Occupational prestige: A sex-neutral concept? Sex Roles, 12, 1061–1071.
Johnson, R. D. (1986). The influence of gender composition on evaluation of professions. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 161–167.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
Kalin, R., & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias in judgments of occupational suitability. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 16, 311–325.
Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kolstad, A. (1977). Sex composition and the social standing of occupations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.
Krefting, L. A., Berger, P. K., & Wallace, M. K., Jr. (1978). The contribution of sex distribution, job content, and occupational classification to job sextyping: Two studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 181–191.
Kreuger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187–195.
Littig, L. W., & Reynolds, C. D. (1984). Effects of sex ratios on occupation prestige and desirability among black and white university students. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 115–119.
Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831.
Locksley, A., Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23–42.
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1979). Sex role socialization and sex discrimination: A synthesis and critique of the literature. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Shaffer, D. R., Gresham, A., Clary, E. G., & Theilman, T. J. (1986). Sex-ratios as a basis for occupational evaluations: A contemporary view. Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 77–83.
Shaw, E. A. (1972). Differential impact of negative stereotyping in employee selection. Personnel Selection, 25, 333–338.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Suchner, R. W. (1979). Sex ratios and occupational prestige: Three failures to replicate a sexist bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 236–239.
Touhey, J. C. (1974a). Effects of additional women professionals on occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 86–89.
Touhey, J. C. (1974b). Effects of additional men on prestige and desirability of occupations typically performed by women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 330–335.
Treiman, D., & Hartmann, H. (1981). Women, work, and wages. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1987). Male-female differences in work-experience, occupations, and earnings: 1984 (Household economic studies series P-70, no. 10). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
White, M. C., Crino, M. D., & DeSanctis, G. L. (1981). Ratings of prestige and desirability: Effects of additional women entering selected business occupations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 588–592.
Wright, J. W. (1987–88). The American almanac of jobs and salaries. New York: Avon Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from Lawrence University. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Alana Matwychuk for her comments on the design of these studies; Karen Carr for her comments on earlier versions of this article; Bob Hoffman of the Wisconsin Career Planning and Placement Association for providing the membership list of his organization for Study 2; Brenda Allwardt, Christina Windberg, Marie Conroy, and Shelly Mueller for their assistance coding data and conducting analyses; and Jennifer Aspen for preparing the graphs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glick, P. Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles 25, 351–378 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289761
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289761