Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine a preferred coordinate system for representation of forearm orientation in 3-dimensional space. In one experiment, the ability of human subjects to perceive angles of the forearm in 3-dimensional space (forearm elevation and yaw — extrinsic coordinate system) was compared to their ability to perceive elbow joint angle (intrinsic coordinate system). While blindfolded, subjects performed an angle reproduction task in which the experimenter first positioned the upper limb in a reference trial. This was followed, after movement of the subject's entire upper limb to a different position, by an attempt to reproduce or match a criterior angle of the reference trial by motion of the forearm in elbow flexion or extension only. Note that matching of the criterion forearm angle in the new upper limb position could not be accomplished by reproducing the entire reference upper limb position, but only by angular motion at the elbow. Matching of all 3 criterion angles was accomplished with about equal accuracy in terms of absolute constant errors and variable errors. Correlation analysis of the perceptual errors showed that forearm elevation and elbow angle perception errors were not biased but that forearm yaw angle matching showed a bias toward elbow angle matching in 7 of 9 subjects. That is, errors in forearm yaw perception were attributed to a tendency toward a preferred intrinsic coordinate system for perception of forearm orientation. These results show that subjects can accurately perceive angles in both extrinsic and intrinsic coordinate systems in 3-dimensional space. Thus, these data conflict with previous reports of highly inaccurate perception of elbow joint angles in comparison to perception of forearm elevation. In an attempt to resolve this conflict with previous results, a second experiment was carried out in which perception of forearm elevation and elbow joint angles with the forearm motion constrained to a vertical plane. Results of this experiment showed that during a two-limb elbow angle matching task, four of five subjects exhibited a clear bias toward forearm elevation angle. During a one-limb angle reproduction task only two of five subjects exhibited such a bias. Perception of elevation angles show little bias toward elbow angle matching. These results indicate that use of tasks in which the limb is supported against gravity and motion is constrained to a vertical plane cause subjects to make perceptual errors during elbow angle matching such that the slopes of the forearms in a vertical plane (elevation angles) are more easily matched. It is concluded that human subjects can use both extrinsic and intrinsic coordinate systems in planning movements. Kinematic aspects may be planned in terms of an extrinsic coordinate system because of the use of vision in specifying location of external targets, but kinetic aspects of movement planning probably requires use of both forearm elevation angles and elbow joint angles to accurately specify forces and torques for muscles spanning the elbow.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
An KN, Hui FC, Morrey BF, Linscheid RL, Chao EY (1981) Muscles across the elbow joint: a biochemical analysis. J Biomech 14:659–669
Biguer B, Donaldson ML, Hein A, Jeannerod M (1988) Neck muscle vibration modifies the representation of visual motion and direction in man. Brain 111:1405–1424
Darling WG, Gilchrist L (1991) Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in 3-dimensional space? Exp Brain Res 85:405–416
Flanders M, Soechting JF (1990) Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 64:1818–1837
Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PBC (1972) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinesthetics shown by vibration. Brain 95:705–748
Inglis JT, Frank JS (1990) The effect of agonist/antagonist muscle vibration on human position sense. Exp Brain Res 81:573–580
McCloskey DI (1978) Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58:763–820
Metzler J, Shepard RN (1986) Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In: Shepard RN, Cooper LA (eds) Mental images and their transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, pp 25–27
Polit A, Bizzi E (1979) Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 42:183–194
Proske U, Schaible H-G, Schmidt RF (1988) Joint receptors and kinaesthesia. Exp Brain Res 72:219–224
Sittig AC, Danier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1985) Separate control of arm position and velocity demonstrated by vibration of muscle tendon in man. Exp Brain Res 60:445–453
Soechting JF (1982) Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation. Brain Res 248: 392–395
Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62:582–594
Soechting JF, Ross B (1984) Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm motion. Neuroscience 13:595–604
Worringham CJ, Stelmach GE, Martin ZE (1987) Limb segment inclination sense in proprioception. Exp Brain Res 66:653–658
Worringham CJ, Stelmach GE (1985) The contribution of gravitational torques to limb position sense. Exp Brain Res 61:38–42
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Darling, W.G. Perception of forearm angles in 3-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 87, 445–456 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231862
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231862