Abstract
We propose that the coronal source longitude and latitude of solar wind plasma can be estimated within ∼ 10°. Previous writers have argued that the solar wind in the ecliptic should originate near the equator and that a quasi-radial hypervelocity (QRH) approximation (constant radial flow) is valid beyond the magnetohydrodynamic critical points. We demonstrate that an extension of the QRH approximation (as if the solar wind flowed radially with constant velocity from the center of the Sun) yields a proper estimate of the high coronal source location at the ‘release zone’ where the solar wind makes its transition to radial interplanetary flow. This ‘extrapolated’ QRH (or EQRH) approximation succeeds because the two main corrections to this source estimate, coronal corotation and interplanetary acceleration, tend to cancel (the former correcting the source location eastward, the latter westward). Although this ‘ideal spiral’ approximation was first suggested by Snyder and Neugebauer (1966), only recently has it been demonstrated that it relates a wide range of interplanetary plasma, magnetic field and energetic particle data to observed coronal magnetic structure. We estimate quantitatively the error in the EQRH approximation by comparison with steady-state streamlines predicted by azimuthally independent and dependent theoretical solutions to the steady-state plasma equations. We find the error in both cases ⩽ 10° in longitude and therefore suggest that the EQRH approximation offers the means to relate observed solar ‘initial conditions’ in the ‘release zone’ directly to interplanetary measurements. If, in addition, the EQRH approximation also leads to agreement with low coronal structure, then there should be a straightforward correspondence to otherwise unobservable high coronal structure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, K. A.: 1969, Solar Physics 6, 111.
Billings, D. E. and Roberts, W. O.: 1964, Astrophys. Norveg. 9, 147.
Brandt, J. C.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 147, 201.
Burlaga, L. F.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4449.
Carovillano, R. L. and Siscoe, G. L.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 401.
Coleman, P. J., Davis, L. Jr., Smith, E. J., and Jones, D. E.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1637.
Dessler, A. J.: 1967, Rev. Geophys. 5, 1.
Fan, C. Y., Pick, M., Pyle, R., Simpson, J. A., and Smith, D. R.: 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 1555.
Fisk, L. A. and Sari, J. W.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 6729.
Goldstein, B. E.: 1971, ‘Nonlinear Corotating Solar Wind Structure’, MIT preprint CSR-P-71-63.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1973a, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 1528.
Hundhausen, A. J.: 1973b, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2035.
Hundhausen, A. J., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., and Strong, I. B.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1979.
Jokipii, J. R. and Parker, E. N.: 1968, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 44.
Kavanagh, L. D. Jr., Schardt, A. W., and Roelof, E. C.: 1970, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 8, 389.
Krieger, A. S., Timothy, A. F., and Roelof, E. C.: 1973, Solar Phys. 29, 505.
Krimigis, S. M., Roelof, E. C., Armstrong, T. P., and Van Allen, J. A.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5921.
Lazarus, A. J. and Goldstein, B. E.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 168, 571.
Leighton, R. B.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1547.
Lin, R. P., Kahler, S. W., and Roelof, E. C.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 338.
Matsuda, T. and Sakurai, T.: 1972, Cosmic Electrodyn. 3, 97.
McCracken, K. G. and Rao, U. R.: 1970, Space Sci. Rev. 11, 155.
McIntosh, P. S.: 1972, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10, 837.
McIntosh, P. S. and Roelof, E. C.: 1972, ‘Hα Structure; an Improved Correlation between the Solar and Interplanetary Magnetic Field’ (abstract), EOS 53, 1113, manuscript in preparation.
Michel, F. C.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1917.
Nolte, J. T. and Roelof, E. C.: 1973a, ‘Large-Scale Structure of the Interplanetary Medium: 2. Evolving Magnetic Field Configurations Deduced from Multi-Spacecraft Observations’, Solar Phys., in press.
Nolte, J. T. and Roelof, E. C.: 1973b, ‘Correlation between Chromospheric and Interplanetary Magnetic Field Polarities near Solar Minimum’ (abstract) EOS 54, 448, manuscript in preparation.
Parker, E. N.: 1963, Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Interscience, New York.
Parker, E. N.: 1969, Space Sci. Rev. 9, 325.
Roelof, E. C.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, p. 486.
Roelof, E. C. and Krimigis, S. M.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 5735.
Sakurai, T.: 1971, Cosmic Electrodyn. 1, 460.
Sarabhai, V.: 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 1555.
Schatten, K. L.: 1972, The Solar Wind, NASA SP-308, 44.
Siscoe, G. L.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 27.
Siscoe, G. L. and Finley, L. T.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 452.
Siscoe, G. L. and Finley, L. T.: 1970, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1817.
Siscoe, G. L., Goldstein, B. E., and Lazarus, A. J.: 1969, J. Geophys. Res. 74, 1759.
Snyder, C. W. and Neugebauer, M.: 1966, in R. J. Macklin (ed.), The Solar Wind, Pergamon Press, p. 25.
Urch, I. H.: 1972, Cosmic Electrodyn. 3, 316.
Weber, E. J. and Davis Jr., L.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 148, 217.
Wilcox, J. M.: 1968, Space Sci. Rev. 8, 258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nolte, J.T., Roelof, E.C. Large-scale structure of the interplanetary medium. Sol Phys 33, 241–257 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152395
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152395