Abstract
We prove the validity of an alternative representation of the Shapley-Shubik (1954) index of voting power, based on the following model. Voting in an assembly consisting of n voters is conducted by roll-call. Every voter is assumed to vote "yea" or "nay" with equal probability, and all n! possible orders in which the voters may be called are also assumed to be equiprobable. Thus there are altogether 2n n! distinct roll-call patterns. Given a simple voting game (a decision rule), the pivotal voter in a roll-call is the one whose vote finally decides the outcome, so that the votes of all those called subsequently no longer make any difference. The main result, stated without proof by Mann and Shapley (1964), is that the Shapley-Shubik index of voter a in a simple voting game is equal to the probability of a being pivotal. We believe this representation of the index is much less artificial than the original one, which considers only the n! roll-calls in which all voters say "yea" (or all say "nay"). The proof of this result proceeds by generalizing the representation so that one obtains a value for each player in any coalitional game, which is easily seen to satisfy Shapley's (1953) three axioms. Thus the generalization turns out to be an alternative representation of the Shapley value. This result implies a non-trivial combinatorial theorem.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brams, S.J. (1975). Game theory and politics. New York: Free Press.
Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
Mann, I. and Shapley, L.S. (1964). The a priori voting strength of the electoral college. In M. Shubik (Ed.), Game theory and related approached to social behavior, 151–164. New York: John Wiley.
Shapley, L.S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Annals of mathematics studies (contributions to the theory of games), 28: 307–317.
Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954). A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American Political Science Review 48: 787–792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Robert Aumann, Ken Binmore, Emmanuel Farjoun and Amnon Rapoport for their helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Felsenthal, D.S., Machover, M. Alternative forms of the Shapley value and the Shapley-Shubik index. Public Choice 87, 315–318 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118651
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118651