Summary
The effect on yield trials of altering plot size was examined by investigating plots with varying numbers of drills (each with six tubers) planted. No evidence was found of the ware yield per drill being affected by different plot sizes nor any effect attributable to neighbouring drills, whether these were planted with another clone or left unplanted. Increasing the number of drills per plot did increase the precision of the estimated clone means as did, of course, increasing the number of replicates. It appeared, however, that increasing the number of replicates was a more efficient way to increase precision. Thus it was concluded that the most efficient utilization of limited planting space was to grow single drill plots with maximum replication.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen E. J., 1978. Plant density. In: P. M. Harris (Ed.), The potato crop. London, Chapman and Hall. pp 278–326.
Caligari P. D. S., 1980. Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Monocultures. Heredity 45: 219–231.
England F., 1977. Response to family selection based on replicated trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 127–134.
Fisher R. A., 1970. Statistical methods for research workers (14th edition). London, Oliver and Boyd. pp. 114–175.
Mather K., J. Hill & P. D. S. Caligari, 1982. Analysis of competitive ability among genotypes of perennial ryegrass. Heredity 48: 421–434.
Spitters C. J. T., 1983. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competitive effects. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 31: 1–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caligari, P.D.S., Brown, J. & Manhood, C.A. The effect of varying the number of drills per plot and the amount of replication on the efficiency of potato yield trials. Euphytica 34, 291–296 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022921
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022921