Abstract
A survey of 346 Norwegian lakes revealed some consistent patterns with regard to the occurrence of Holopedium gibberum versus Daphnia spp. Both biomass and frequency of Holopedium were negatively correlated with pH and Ca-concentration, and this species rarely occurred at pH > 8, or Ca-concentrations > 10 mg l-1. On the contrary, the various Daphnia species, although showing different susceptibilities to fish predation and different preferences for lake productivity, were all positively correlated with Ca. Statistical analysis as well as laboratory experiments and biochemical considerations, suggest that Holopedium may be a superior competitor at very low Ca-concentrations, but is replaced by Daphnia at higher pH and increasing Ca-content. High pH in itself is possibly disadvantageous for Holopedium by preventing formation of the muco-polysaccaride mantle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. D., 1973. Competitionand the relative abundances of two cladocerans.Ecology 54: 485–498.
Andersen, T, 1993. Grazers assources and sinks for nutrients. Dr. phil.thesis, University of Oslo, 263 pp.
Andersen, T. & D. O. Hessen, 1991. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of freshwater Zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 807–814.
Botrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M.Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, A. Illbricht-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T.Weglenska, 1976.A review of some problems in Zooplankton production studies.Norw. J. Zool. 24: 419–456.
Geller, W., 1985. Production, foodutilization and losses of two coexisting, ecologically different Daphniaspecies.Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 21:67–79.
Ghilarov, A. M, 1984. The paradoxof the plankton reconsidered; or,why do species coexist? Oikos 43: 46–52.
Goulden,C. E., L. L. Henry & A. J. Tessier, 1982. Body size, energy reserves, and competitive ability in three species ofcladocera. Ecology 63: 1780–1789.
Hamilton, J. D., 1958. On the biology of Holopedium gibberum Zaddach (Crustacea: Cladocera).Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 13: 785– 788.
Hessen,D. O., 1985.Filtering structures and particle size selection in coexisting Cladocera. Oecologia66: 368–372.
Hessen,D. O., 1992.Nutrient element limitation of Zooplankton production. Am. Nat. 140: 799–814.
Hessen,D. O., T.Andersen & A. Lyche, 1989. Differential grazing and resource utilization of Zooplankton in a humic lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. 114:321–347
Hessen,D. O., B.Faafeng & T. Andersen, 1995. Replacement of herbivorous Zooplankton species along gradients ofecosystem productivityand fish predation pressure. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. (in press).
Hoenicke, R. & C. R. Goldman, 1987.Resource dynamics and seasonalchanges in competitive interactions among three cladoceran species. J. Plankton Res. 9: 397–417.
Hutchinson, G. E., 1961. The paradox of theplankton. Am. Nat. 95: 137–145.
Jacobs, J., 1977. Coexistence of similar Zooplankton species by differential adaptation toreproduction and escape in an environment with fluctuating food and enemy densities. II.Field data analysis of Daphnia.Oecologia (Berl.) 35: 35–54.
Lynch, M, 1978. Complex interactions betweennatural coexploiters -Daphniaand Ceriodaphnia.Ecology59: 552–564.
Lynch, ML, L. J. Weider & W. Lampert,1986. Measurement of the carbon balance in Daphnia.Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:17–33.
Matveev, V. F., 1983.Estimating competition in cladocerans using data on dynamics of clutch sizeand population density. Int. Rev. ges.Hydrobiol. 68: 785–798.
Matveev, V. F., 1985. Competition and population time lags inBosmina(Cladocera, Crustacea). Int. Rev.ges. Hydrobiol. 70: 491–508.
Neill, W. E., 1975.Experimental studies on microcrustacean competition, community compositionand efficiency of resource utilization.Ecology 56: 809–826.
Pejler, B., 1965. Regional-ecologicalstudies of Swedish freshwater Zooplankton. Zool.Bidr. Upps. 36: 407–515.
Persson, G., 1985. Community grazing andthe regulation of in situ clearance and feeding rates of planktonic crustaceans inlakes in theKuokkel area, northern Sweden. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 70: 197–238.
Seitz, A., 1980. The coexistence of three species of Daphniainthe Klostersee. I. Field studies on the dynamicsof reproduction. Oecologia(Berl.).45: 117–130.
Stenson, J. A. E., 1973. On predation and Holopediumgibberum (Zaddach) distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 1005–1010.
Sterner, R.W. & D. O. Hessen, 1994.Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 1–29.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. & C. W. N. Looman,1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model.Vegetatio 65:3–11.
Tessier, A. J., 1986a. Life history and bodysize evolution in Holope diumgibberumZaddach (Crustacea:Cladocera). Freshwat. Biol. 16:279–286.
Tessier, A. J., 1986b. Comparative population regulation of two planktonic Cladocera (Holopediumgibberumand Daphnia catawba).Ecology 67: 285–302.
Tessier, A. J. & R. J. Horwitz, 1990.Influence of water chemistry on size structure of Zooplankton assemblages. Can. J. Fish. aquat.Sci. 47: 1937–1943.
Trexler, J. C. & J. Travis, 1993.Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74(6): 1629–1637.
Weiser, J., 1942. Holopedium gibberumauf der Böhmische- Märischen Anhöhe. Arch. Hydrobiol. 39: 334–352.
Yan,N. & G. L. Mackie, 1989. Seasonal patterns in metal levels of the net plankton of threeCanadian Shield lakes. Sci. Total Env. 87/88:439–461.
Yan, N. D., W. Keller, J. R. Pitblado &G. L. Macjie, 1988. Daphnia- Holopediumrelationships in Canadian Shieldlakes ranging in acidity. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 23: 252–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hessen, D.O., Faafeng, B.A., Andersen, T. (1995). Competition or niche segregation between Holopedium and Daphnia; empirical light on abiotic key parameters. In: Larsson, P., Weider, L.J. (eds) Cladocera as Model Organisms in Biology. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 107. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0021-2_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0021-2_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4013-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0021-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive