Abstract
Inhibition of root elongation was the most sensitive response of soybean plants to Al in solution culture. Primary-root elongation was confined to the apical 10-mm root tip. Initial response of root elongation to Al seemed to be due to inhibition of cell elongation rather than cell division. Negative correlations existed between Al concentrations of root tips and genotypic root length at low and high Al supply. Using the product of the primary-root length and the longest secondary-root length after 4 days of Al treatment (74 μmol L-1) relative to the control without Al as parameter, 938 soybean genotypes from the world soybean collection were screened for Al tolerance. Large genetic variability could be found. Elsewhere reported differences in Al tolerance of selected soybean genotypes could be confirmed. However, no relationship existed between genotypic Al tolerance in solution culture and adaptation to an acid soil in Southeast Nigeria reported by UTA (Annual Report, 1981). Therefore a sand-culture screening procedure was established. Compared to solution culture, a 10 times higher Al concentration was necessary to inhibit root growth to a comparable degree. There was a significant but rather weak correlation (r = 0.43) between the responses to Al of 31 genotypes in solution and sand culture. Genotypic response of root growth to Al in sand compared to solution culture was more closely, but still not significantly, related to growth of the genotypes in acid soil under field conditions in Nigeria. This indicates, that inhibition of root growth by Al was not primarily responsible for growth reduction due to soil acidity under those field conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armiger W H, Foy C D, Fleming A L and Caldwell B E 1968 Differential tolerance of soybean varieties to an acid soil high in exchangeable aluminium. Agron. J. 60, 67–70.
Barber D A and Gunn K B 1974 The effect of mechanical forces on the exudation of organic substances by the roots of cereal plants grown under sterile conditions. New Phytol. 73, 39–45.
Brown J C and Jones W E 1977 Fitting plants nutritionally to soils I. Soybeans. Agron. J. 69, 399–404.
Clarkson D T 1965 The effect of aluminium and some other trivalent metal cations on cell division in the root apices of Allium cepa. Ann. Bot. 29, 309–315.
Devine T E, Foy C D and Mason D L 1979 Aluminium tolerance in soybean germplasm. Genetics Newsl. 6.
Foy C D, Fleming A L and Armiger W H 1969 Aluminium tolerance of soybean varieties in relation to calcium nutrition. Agron. J. 61, 505–511.
Foy C D, Lafever H N, Schwartz J W and Fleming AL 1974 Aluminium tolerance of wheat cultivars related to region of origin. Agron. J. 66, 751–758.
Furlani P R and Clark R B 1981 Screening sorghum for aluminium tolerance in nutrient solutions. Agron. J. 73. 587–594.
Hanson W D and Kamprath E J 1979 Selection for aluminium tolerance in soybeans based on seedling-root growth. Agron. J. 71, 581–586.
Hohenberg J S and Munns D N 1984 Effect of soil acidity factors on nodulation and growth of Vigna unguiculata in solution culture. Agron. J. 76, 477–481.
Horst W J, Wagner A and Marschner H 1982 Mucilage protects root meristems from aluminium injury. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 105, 435–444.
Horst W J, Wagner A and Marschner H 1983 Effect of aluminium on root growth, cell-division rate and mineral element contents in roots of Vigna unguiculata genotypes. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 199, 95–103.
UTA 1981 Screening for tolerance to aluminium toxicity in acid soils. Annual Report.
Klotz F and Horst W J 1988 Genotypic differences in aluminium tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L.) as affected by ammonium and nitrate-nitrogen nutrition. J. Plant Physiol. 132, 702–707.
Konzak C F, Polie E and Kittrick J A 1977 In Plant Adaption to Mineral Stress in Problem Soils. Eds. M J Wright and D A Ferrari, pp 311–327. Special Publ. Cornell Univ. Screening several crops for aluminium tolerance. Agric. Exp. Stn. Ithaca, NY.
Lafever H N, Campbell L D and Foy CD 1977 Differential response of wheat cultivars to Al. Agron. J. 69, 563–568.
Morimura S, Takahashi E and Matsumoto H 1978 Association of aluminium with nuclei and inhibition of cell division in onion (Allium cepa) roots. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 88, 395–401.
Munns D N and Foy R L 1977 Comparative lime requirements of tropical and temperate legumes. Plant and Soil 46, 533–548.
Nicholaides III J J, Cout O W and Wade M K (Eds.) 1983 Agronomic-economic Research on Soils of the Tropics. Soil Sci. Dept. North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC.
Reid A, Jones G D, Arminger W H, Foy C D, Koch E J and Starling T M 1969 Differential aluminium tolerance of winter barley varieties and selections in associated greenhouse and field experiments. Agron. J. 61, 218–222.
Sapra W T, Mebrahtu T and Mugwira L M 1982 Soybean germplasm and cultivar aluminium tolerance in nutrient solution and bladen clay loam soil. Agron. J. 74, 687–690.
Sartain J B and Kamprath E J 1978 Aluminium tolerance of soybean cultivars based on root elongation in solution culture compared with growth in acid soil. Agron. J. 70, 17–20.
Taylor G J and Foy C D 1985 Mechanisms of aluminium tolerance in Triticum aestivum L. (wheat). III. Long-term pH changes induced in nutrient solutions by winter cultivars differing in tolerance to aluminium. J. Plant Nutr. 8, 613–628.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Horst, W.J., Klotz, F. (1990). Screening soybean for aluminium tolerance and adaptation to acid soils. In: El Bassam, N., Dambroth, M., Loughman, B.C. (eds) Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_53
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7421-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2053-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive