Summary
Sucrose transport in plants has been as area of intense interest for many years, particularly following the cloning of the first sucrose/proton symporter, or sucrose transporter, from spinach more than 15 years ago. Much debate and research has focused on phloem loading, particularly the issue of apoplasmic versus symplasmic pathways of loading and in the apoplasmic loaders, on the location of the sucrose transporter protein and mRNA. This chapter focuses on pointing out the remaining unanswered questions in phloem loading and sucrose transport in general rather than extensively reviewing the literature. We discuss in more detail the long-distance transport pathway from source to sink and post-phloem unloading in sink tissue such as dicot seed, cereal grain, sink leaves, roots and tubers.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
I. Introduction
The long-distance transport, or translocation, of assimilates from source tissues to sink tissues occurs in the phloem of the vascular bundles. In source leaves, sucrose is synthesized in the cytoplasm of mesophyll cells as the major product of photosynthesis (see Chapter 27). For translocation, sucrose moves into the phloem sieve element (phloem loading), and travels through phloem conduits to other parts of the plant (long-distance transport). In sink tissues such as shoot apices, roots and storage tissues, sucrose moves out of the phloem (phloem unloading) and provides the carbon source for development, growth and storage (summarized in Fig. 28.1).
As for glucose in the animal kingdom, higher plants utilize only a few defined sugar molecules for the long-distance transport of photoassimilate. Sucrose is known as the major translocating sugar in angiosperms (see Section II.B). Also sucrose is the major solute found in the phloem (sieve tube) sap of most plant species, providing not only the carbon source for growth and metabolism but also the driving force for bulk flow of the sap, namely, translocation of all other constituents in the phloem sap, including signaling molecules such as phytohormones (see Turgeon and Wolf, 2008 for further details).
Recent intensive research has made considerable progress in elucidating the mechanism of translocation at the molecular level, particularly in the area of proton-coupled sucrose transport systems across the plasma membrane, and their role in the long-distance transport of sucrose. By way of introduction, we briefly address below some key features of the translocation of sucrose in plants then detail the specific aspects of the transport on a tissue-by-tissue basis.
A. Phloem and Sieve Element/Companion Cell Complex
The phloem of angiosperms comprises four kinds of tissues, i.e., the sieve elements (SEs), the companion cells (CCs), the phloem parenchyma and the phloem fiber (see Van Bel, 2003 for further details). SEs are longitudinally interconnected via sieve pores at their terminal ends, and serve as the conducting tube or sieve tube, for the phloem sap. Whereas SEs and CCs are formed from a common mother cell by cell division, the two types of cells undergo contrasting differentiation processes during their maturation. SEs lose a large part of the cytoplasmic content such as the nucleus, tonoplast and ribosomes. CCs, on the other hand, retain dense cytoplasm and numerous ribosomes and mitochondria. Since SEs and CCs are closely linked by many plasmodesmata, one important task of CCs is considered to be the supply of compounds necessary for SEs to remain active over the entire growth period. These close ontogenic and functional relationships of the two cells have led to the expression: sieve element/companion cell complex (SE/CC complex), to describe their association.
B. Mass Flow Model
To account for the mechanism of long-distance transport of solutes through the phloem continuum, a pressure-driven mass flow model offers the simplest and most widely accepted explanation (see Thorpe and Minchin, 1996; Minchin and Lacointe, 2005). According to this model, solutes (sugars, amino acids, inorganic ions, etc.) move from a source to a sink along an osmotic turgor pressure gradient in the sieve tube. Within source regions, solutes are actively taken up into sieve tubes (phloem loading). This active loading process creates a more negative osmotic potential in the sieve tube. At the sink, solutes are released from sieve tubes (phloem unloading), resulting in a less negative osmotic potential in the sieve tube, allowing water to move out. This hydrostatic pressure drives a bulk flow of phloem sap from source to sink.
C. Sucrose/Proton Symporters (Sucrose Transporters)
Since the cloning by yeast complementation of the first plant sucrose transporter (SUT, Riesmeier et al., 1992), and aided by the sequencing of the Arabidopsis thaliana and rice genomes, more than 85 putative SUT sequences from at least 35 species of higher plants have been lodged in the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). All of the SUTs cloned thus far fall into the major facilitator super-family (Marger and Saier, 1993; Saier, 2000) characterized by 12 predicted plasma membrane-spanning helices, arranged in two groups of 6, separated by a cytoplasmic loop (Fig. 28.2). A histidine residue located in the first extracellular loop is conserved in all plant SUTs so far identified and has been shown to be involved in the sucrose transport activity by site-directed mutagenesis (Lu and Bush, 1998). A number of these transporters have been expressed in vitro using yeast and oocyte expression systems (see below) with K m values for sucrose ranging from 0.2 to 2 mM (see Lemoine, 2000; Kühn, 2003). There is strong evidence that the mechanism of transport is via a 1:1 sucrose/H+ co-transport, driven by a transmembrane pH gradient supported by the proton pumping ATPase (Boorer et al., 1996). Some SUTs (in particular the SUT2 class cloned by Barker et al., 2000) are characterized by large cytoplasmic loop regions and are reputed to play a role in sugar sensing (see Lalonde et al., 1999; Barker et al., 2000). The role of sucrose transporters in sugar sensing will be reviewed later in this chapter.
Many reports have shown the transcriptional regulation of SUT genes in various developmental processes, by environmental factors such as light and salt stress, and by endogenous signals such as sugars and hormones (reviewed in Lemoine, 2000; Williams et al., 2000; Kühn, 2003; Lalonde et al., 2004; Sauer, 2007). Furthermore, SUT proteins can be phosphorylated (Roblin et al., 1998) and oligomerized in vitro (Reinders et al., 2002; Schulze et al., 2003) and in vivo in a redox-dependent manner (Krügel et al., 2008). It is likely that SUTs are subject to complex regulation at different levels.
For most dicot species, two or more SUT genes have been reported (reviewed by Lemoine, 2000; Williams et al., 2000; Sauer, 2007). In A. thaliana, for example, nine SUT genes are found in the genome and their properties have been examined by functional expression in yeast cells (Sauer and Stolz, 1994; Barker et al., 2000; Meyer et al., 2000; Schulze et al., 2000; Weise et al., 2000; Ludwig et al., 2000; Sauer et al., 2004). Intriguingly, two of the A. thaliana SUT genes, AtSUC6 and AtSUC7, have been reported to encode aberrant proteins and seem to be pseudogenes (Sauer et al., 2004). In potato and tomato, three different SUT genes, SUT1, SUT2 and SUT4 have been cloned and characterized (Riesmeier et al., 1993; Barker et al., 2000; Weise et al., 2000). In monocot species, five SUT genes appear to be present in the genome sequence of rice and are expressed in a variety of tissues (Aoki et al., 2003) while in barley, two genes have been identified (Weschke et al., 2000), three homeologous genes encoding SUT1 have been cloned from wheat (Aoki et al., 2002) and one SUT1-type transporter has been cloned and characterized from maize (Aoki et al., 1999) and sugarcane (Rae et al., 2005). Heterologous expression of monocot SUT genes has proven problematic with low levels of activity achieved in yeast cells for OsSUT1 and OsSUT3 (Hirose et al., 1997; Aoki et al., 2003), barley HvSUT1 and HvSUT2 (Weschke et al., 2000), and sugarcane ShSUT1 (Rae et al., 2005); however, recently maize ZmSUT1, as well as HvSUT1 and ShSUT1, have been expressed successfully in oocytes (Carpaneto et al., 2005; Sivitz et al., 2005; Reinders et al., 2006). The reason for the difficulty in obtaining good expression of the monocot SUTs in yeast is unknown and not due to the lack of sustained effort (R.T. Furbank, N. Aoki and G.N. Scofield, unpublished observations; N. Sauer, personal communication).
Based on phylogenetic analysis of deduced peptide sequences, SUTs from both dicots and monocots can be classified into three groups (Fig. 28.3; also see Sauer, 2007; Braun and Slewinski, 2009). Type-I SUTs encompass the classic SUT1-type dicot transporters which have often been assigned a role in phloem loading (see Section II.C). Type-II includes all the monocot SUT1 genes, OsSUT3, 4 and 5 and the dicot SUT2 class (the putative “sugar sensors”). Although it is plausible that each SUT group possesses distinctive biochemical properties (see Kühn, 2003; Lalonde et al., 2004; Sauer, 2007), the three SUT groups do not appear, so far, to be functionally distinct, except possibly only on the basis of Km values for sucrose, measured in heterologous expression systems (see Lemoine, 2000; Kühn, 2003; Sauer, 2007). It is very difficult to assign physiological function based on such phylogenetic relationships, as evidenced by the common observation of expression of each of these SUT genes in a variety of tissues during plant development both in dicots and in cereals (reviewed in Kühn, 2003; Sauer, 2007). There also seem to be differences in the structure of the SUT gene family between monocots and dicots; a Type-I SUT sequence is unlikely to exist in the rice genome as it has not been found in any monocots, including expressed sequence tags in public database. The absence of a monocot gene in the classic dicot SUT1 cluster raises interesting questions about phloem loading in cereal species. The physiological role of these SUTs will be the topic of further discussion in the following sections.
II. Phloem Loading
Phloem loading, often defined as the movement and transport of assimilates from the mesophyll cell into the sieve tube, has primary importance as the first step in the translocation of assimilates. Mesophyll cells are closely interconnected by plasmodesmata, and the sucrose synthesized there is believed to move symplasmically via plasmodesmata toward the phloem region of minor veins (see Van Bel, 1993; Lalonde et al., 2003). In the phloem of minor veins, sucrose (or its derivatives) is transported into the SE/CC complex for translocation.
A. Phloem Anatomy and the Mode of Phloem Loading
Usually, SEs have no symplasmic connection with surrounding cells except CCs, while the frequency of plasmodesmata between CCs and surrounding cells vary greatly depending on plant species. Gamalei (1989) has published an extensive survey of phloem anatomy of leaf minor veins in as many as 700 species, and found that they can be classified into two general groups mostly in a family dependent manner: those with numerous plasmodesmata between CCs and the adjacent cells were designated as type 1 (majority of woody plants and some of herbaceous plants, e.g., Cucurbitaceae, Lamiaceae), while those with few or very rare plasmodesmata at this interface as type 2 (mostly herbaceous plants, e.g., Asteraceae, Fabaceae). This suggests that in type 1 species the assimilate could move entirely through symplasm from the mesophyll cells to the SE/CC complex (symplasmic loading; Fig. 28.4), and, alternatively, in type 2 species apoplasmic, carrier-mediated transport is likely to occur around the SE/CC complex (apoplasmic loading; Fig. 28.4). Several lines of evidence in fact support this view: for example, in type 2 species, but not in type 1 species, accumulation in the minor vein and efflux from the cut end of the petiole of 14C-photoassimilate are both severely affected by para-chloromercuribenzen sulphonic acid (PCMBS), a potential inhibitor of carrier-mediated sugar uptake from the apoplasm (Van Bel et al., 1994). In addition, molecular biological studies have shown a crucial role of SUTs located in the plasma membrane of CCs or SEs in some type 2 species (see Section II.C). However, the symplasmic continuity presented by type 1 vein structure does not necessarily exclude the co-existence of both loading modes in the SE/CC complex. It has also been reported that some plants have transitional vein anatomy between type 1 and type 2 (type 1-2a, Gamalei, 1991), but their mode(s) of phloem loading remains unclear. In addition, it is feasible that the two modes of phloem loading work within single veins or single SE/CC complexes (Van Bel et al., 1992).
B. Sucrose as Translocating Sugar
Sucrose is contained in the phloem sap of every plant species so far examined and in many of them it is the only detectable sugar molecule. Depending on what kinds of sugars are transported in the phloem, higher plants can be divided into three major groups (Zimmermann and Ziegler, 1975). The first group, most common among higher plants, translocates only sucrose. The second group includes some species in the Cucurbitaceae and Lamiaceae for example, which translocate mainly raffinose-family oligosaccharides (RFOs) such as raffinose, stachyose and verbascose in addition to sucrose. The third group translocates sugar alcohols besides sucrose, for example, mannitol in Apiaceae species and sorbitol in Rosaceae species. Only recently it was demonstrated that a considerable amount of hexoses (e.g., glucose and fructose) could be translocated in the phloem sap of some herbaceous plants (e.g., Paraveraceae, Ranunculaceae); this had hardly been investigated in previous studies (Van Bel and Hess, 2008). Although re-evaluation of a wide-spectrum of plant species is awaited to further address this issue, this new insight suggests that hexose can be regarded as phloem mobile transport sugar, equivalent to sucrose, RFOs, or sugar alcohols, and that a transport mechanism exists for accumulating hexose into sieve tubes.
Intriguingly, this current classification based on the combination of translocating sugars partially correlates with the mode of phloem loading or anatomy of minor vein phloem described above. The RFO-translocating species typically have type 1 minor vein structure, suggesting that RFOs favor symplasmic phloem loading. On the other hand, species with type 2 vein structure generally transport only sucrose, implying apoplasmic sucrose loading.
The hypothesis of symplasmic phloem loading in the RFO-translocating type 1 species became more compelling in light of the following physiological studies. In Coleus blumei, a typical RFO-translocating type 1 species, the concentration of solute was estimated to be much higher in SE/CC complexes than in surrounding parenchyma cells (Fisher, 1986), and accumulation of 14C-photoassimilate into minor veins occurred apparently against the concentration gradient and was insensitive to PCMBS (Turgeon and Gowan, 1990). If this is the case, a simple question arises how a high concentration of photoassimilates is maintained in the SE/CC complex, irrespective of frequent plasmodesmatal connections which can facilitate diffusion of solutes toward the surrounding cells. A model to explain this, known as ‘polymer trap theory’, has been proposed by Turgeon (1991). Sucrose moves symplasmically to CCs where it is converted into RFOs which are too large in size to diffuse back through plasmodesmata toward surrounding parenchyma cells. Several lines of evidence support this hypothesis: RFO synthesis takes place in CCs (Beebe and Turgeon, 1992), and sugar concentrations in micro-dissected leaf tissues are consistent with diffusion of substrates for RFO synthesis (sucrose and galactinol) into CCs, but not with diffusion of RFOs toward the surrounding cells (Haritatos et al., 1996). Furthermore, the importance of RFO synthesis in phloem loading has been demonstrated recently, by RNAi suppression of genes for galactinol synthase (McCaskill and Turgeon, 2007). However, the size exclusion limit of the plasmodesmata connecting the CCs with the adjacent parenchyma cells is not known although it is a key factor of this hypothesis.
It should be noted that all the type 1 species do not necessarily transport RFOs. It has been suggested that transport of RFOs is restricted to the type 1 plants having CCs with a specialized anatomy known as intermediary cells, and other type 1 plants with ordinary CCs transport mostly sucrose (Turgeon and Medville, 2004). It has also been reported as an extreme case that a type 1 species willow translocates only sucrose, and, surprisingly, the sucrose seems to move simply following the concentration gradient from the mesophyll into the transport phloem, suggesting the absence of an active loading mechanism (Turgeon and Medville, 1998). In addition, the loading mechanism of sugar alcohols and the possible relationship with phloem anatomy still remains unclear (see Noiraud et al., 2001), however, genes encoding sugar alcohol transporters have been identified in some plant species (see Juchaux-Cachau et al., 2007; and references therein). In general, it is not possible to predict the mode of phloem loading and/or sugar transport simply from vein anatomy without more comprehensive studies of the physiological and anatomical heterogeneity of the SE/CC complex.
C. Sucrose Transporter as a Phloem Loader
Since the early 1970s, it has been inferred from the following observations that energy-dependent transport is necessary for the apoplasmic loading of sucrose into the SE/CC complex (reviewed in Giaquinta, 1983; Van Bel, 1993). First, as mentioned above, only a small number of sugars including sucrose are found in the phloem sap, implying selective uptake into the SE/CC complex. Second, sucrose concentrations in the phloem sap as high as 200 to 1,600 mM suggest an active transport of sucrose against the concentration gradient. Third, the activity of H+-ATPase localized in the plasma membrane of SE/CC complex rises during the sink-to-source transition of developing leaves. Fourth, phloem loading of sucrose is markedly inhibited by the thiol group-modifying reagent PCMBS, implying the involvement of membrane protein(s) in the active transport of sucrose. Detailed biochemical studies using plasma membrane vesicles have reinforced this view, and researchers came to infer the presence of a sucrose/H+ symporter on the plasma membrane of SE/CC complexes by the late 1980s (see Bush, 1993; Van Bel, 1993). The first cDNA encoding a sucrose transporter protein was isolated from the source leaves of spinach and designated SoSUT1, S pinacia o leracea su crose t ransporter 1 (Riesmeier et al., 1992). In this study a yeast complementation system was used: a yeast strain which cannot absorb sucrose from external media but can metabolize it within the cell was transformed with a spinach cDNA library and selected on the medium containing sucrose as the sole carbon source. The yeast cells expressing SoSUT1 were shown to take up sucrose (and maltose) selectively from media with an apparent K m for sucrose of 1.5 mM. The uptake activity is pH-dependent (higher activity in lower pH) and severely inhibited by either thiol modifying reagents or uncouplers. All these biochemical properties of SoSUT1 strongly suggest it to be a H+-symporter and give striking agreement with the in planta properties of the sucrose/H+ symporter that had been assumed to be involved in phloem loading. After SoSUT1, genes for SUTs have been isolated from many other plant species such as potato (Riesmeier et al., 1993), A. thaliana (Sauer and Stolz, 1994), common plantain (Gahrtz et al., 1994) and rice (Hirose et al., 1997), and most of them have been shown to have similar biochemical and structural characteristics.
The first attempt to localize the expression of SUT genes was carried out in the source leaves of potato by in situ hybridization and demonstrated that StSUT1 mRNA is located in the phloem (Riesmeier et al., 1993). Similarly, the proteins of A. thaliana AtSUC2 (Sauer and Stolz, 1994) and common plantain PmSUC2 (Stadler et al., 1995) have been shown to exist in the plasma membrane of CCs by immunolocalization. In addition, antisense suppression of StSUT1 led to decreased leaf photosynthesis and sugar export, accumulation of soluble sugars and starch in leaves and retardation in growth (Riesmeier et al., 1994; Kühn et al., 1996; Lemoine et al., 1996). Similar phenomena were also observed in the insertion mutant lines of AtSUC2 (Gottwald et al., 2000) as well as antisense suppression lines of tobacco NtSUT1 (Bürkle et al., 1998). All these data indicate that the SUTs have a crucial role in the apoplasmic phloem loading of sucrose in the source leaves.
However, it should be noted that phloem loading is not necessarily the sole function of SUTs (see Sections III and IV). Even in the case of a typical “phloem loader” described above the expression of the SUTs has been observed not only in source leaves but also in some sink tissues where sucrose is delivered from the phloem (see Section IV). At the same time, localization of a SUT to the SE/CC complex is not the hallmark of a phloem loader (see Section III.A). Whereas rice OsSUT1 was expressed in SE/CC (Matsukura et al., 2000; Scofield et al., 2007b), antisense suppression of OsSUT1 gave no phenotypic changes supporting its role in phloem loading (Ishimaru et al., 2001; Scofield et al., 2002).
D. Phloem Loading in Grass Species
Most of the discussion on phloem loading described above is based almost exclusively on data from dicot species. To date, our knowledge on the phloem anatomy and the loading mechanism of monocot species is still limited compared to those of dicot species. The following observations from cereal species support the likelihood that apoplasmic loading of sucrose occurs in these agriculturally important crops. (1) In rice, maize, wheat and barley, sucrose is the major sugar found in their phloem sap (Fukumorita and Chino, 1982; Hayashi and Chino, 1986; Ohshima et al., 1990; Winter et al., 1992). (2) In rice, maize and barley, leaf minor veins possess the type 2a anatomy, namely, the CCs are connected with the adjacent cells by only a few plasmodesmata (Evert et al., 1978, 1996; Kaneko et al., 1980; Botha and Cross, 1997). (3) In barley and wheat, symplasmic isolation of source leaf SE/CC complexes has been shown by fluorescent dye transport experiments (Haupt et al., 2001; Aoki et al., 2004). (4) In wheat and maize, assimilate transport from leaves is inhibited by PCMBS (Thompson and Dale, 1981).
As mentioned in Section I.C, involvement of SUTs in phloem loading remains unclear in monocot species. Only a little information is available on cellular localization and physiological function of SUTs in monocot leaves, while SUT mRNAs have been found in source leaves of rice (Hirose et al., 1997; Aoki et al., 2003), maize (Aoki et al., 1999), barley (Weschke et al., 2000), wheat (Aoki et al., 2002) and sugarcane (Rae et al., 2005). Involvement of SUT in assimilate transport in source leaves was previously suggested in maize as the level of ZmSUT1 mRNA increases during leaf maturation and with accumulation of carbohydrates in the mature leaf (Aoki et al., 1999). This hypothesis that ZmSUT1 functions in phloem loading in mature maize leaves, has recently been supported by characterizing a knockout mutant in this gene (Slewinski et al., 2009). In mature wheat leaf blades, TaSUT1 protein localizes to the SE of small and medium veins, implying its direct involvement in phloem loading (Aoki et al., 2004). On the other hand, in sugarcane leaves, ShSUT1 protein is not found in the phloem but in the surrounding vascular parenchyma cells and mestome sheath cells (Rae et al., 2005), suggesting its role in retrieval, or possibly release, of sucrose (see Sections II.E and III.A). Furthermore, unlike dicot Type-I SUTs, antisense repression of OsSUT1 expression in transgenic rice does not appear to affect phloem loading (Ishimaru et al., 2001; Scofield et al., 2002). Although these monocot SUT1 orthologs all fall into the same cluster in the phylogenetic tree of plant SUTs (Fig. 28.3) and appear to possess a similar affinity for sucrose (Weschke et al., 2000; Rae et al., 2005; Carpaneto et al., 2005), their localization and role(s) in the phloem loading pathway may differ depending on species. Further studies are obviously needed in order to evaluate the contribution of SUT-mediated membrane transport to phloem loading in grass species, considering the expression and localization of different SUT isogenes. In fact, all five SUT isogenes appear to be expressed in rice source leaves (Aoki et al., 2003).
Interestingly, a maize mutant sxd1 (sucrose export defective1) exhibits severely impaired growth and accumulates a large amount of starch in its leaves (Russin et al., 1996). This symptom has been attributed to occlusion of plasmodesmata at the bundle sheath/vascular parenchyma interface and the resultant blockage of assimilate export from the source leaves (Russin et al., 1996; Botha et al., 2000). Although neither are directly relevant to the SE/CC complex nor SUTs, this provides valuable information on the physiological role of plasmodesmata in the intercellular transport of assimilates.
Later on, the maize SXD1 gene has been isolated (Provencher et al., 2001) and surprisingly found to be highly similar to an A. thaliana gene VTE1, which encodes a tocopherol cyclase, an enzyme essential for vitamin E synthesis (Porfirova et al., 2002). Subsequently, Sattler et al. (2003) have confirmed a tocopherol deficiency in maize sxd1 leaves and tocopherol cyclase activity with recombinant SXD1 protein. However, an A. thaliana tocopherol-deficient line vte1 having a mutation in VTE1 did not show any sucrose export phenotype analogous to the maize sxd1 (Porfirova et al., 2002). In contrast, RNAi-mediated silencing of an SXD1 ortholog in potato led to a tocopherol deficiency in leaves and impaired photoassimilate export from leaves concomitant with vascular-specific callose deposition in source leaves (Hofius et al., 2004). It appears that the response of assimilate export phenotypes to a deficiency in tocopherol cyclase differs depending upon plant species.
Recently, another interesting maize mutant tdy1 (tie-dyed1) was reported and characterized. The tdy1 mutant plants develop variegated yellow and green leaf sectors and accumulate starch and sucrose in the yellow sectors (Braun et al., 2006). The starch accumulation of tdy1 leaves seems to be attributable to impaired sucrose export without reduction of starch breakdown (Slewinski et al., 2008) but by different mechanisms from sxd1 (Ma et al., 2008). Subsequently, TDY1 gene was cloned and found that TDY1 encodes a novel transmembrane protein and is exclusively expressed in phloem of both sink and source tissues (Ma et al., 2009). Fluorescent dye movement experiments revealed that source leaves of tdy1 plants showed retarded phloem loading, but phloem transport and unloading in sink tissues were unaffected, suggesting that TDY1 functions in carbon partitioning by promoting phloem loading although a detailed mechanism remains unclear. Notably, TDY1 orthologous proteins are found only in grass species to date. This may be a clue to understand the mode and the regulation of phloem loading in grasses.
E. Releasing Sucrose to Phloem Apoplasm
One important issue that has remained unresolved in the apoplasmic phloem loading pathway is where and how sucrose is released to the apoplasm prior to its active uptake into SE/CC complexes. There is no clear answer to this question, although the importance of the apoplasmic sucrose pool in phloem loading has been clearly demonstrated in vivo in transgenic solanaceous and A. thaliana plants expressing a yeast acid invertase in the cell wall (reviewed in Schobert et al., 2000). The overexpression of extracellular invertase led to a large accumulation of carbohydrates, a reduction of photoassimilate export and an inhibition of photosynthesis in the source leaves, resulting from cleavage of sucrose in the leaf apoplasm followed by retrieval of hexoses into mesophyll cells (see Schobert et al., 2000).
Based on physiological studies using leaf tissues and discs and structural observations on plasmodesmatal connectivity in leaf vascular bundles, phloem parenchyma cells (or bundle sheath cells in some cases) are considered to be the most probable site for the sucrose release (see Van Bel, 1993; Beebe and Russin, 1999). In some plant species, the minor vein phloem is surrounded by ‘thick-walled’ cells, whose cell walls are sometimes heavily lignified or suberized (e.g., bundle sheath cells in C4 plants). These thickened cell walls surrounding the phloem may be a physical barrier to membrane transport between the two apoplasmic compartments, vascular phloem tissue and non-vascular mesophyll tissue (cf. Section III.B.2). If this is the case, photoassimilate has to move symplasmically via plasmodesmata, to reach phloem (parenchyma) cells. A series of reports on the maize sxd1 mutant mentioned in Section II.D provides the most promising evidence for this hypothesis (see Schobert et al., 2000).
Mesophyll cells have been demonstrated to be able to release and take up sucrose in a number of studies (see Schobert et al., 2000). Whereas the mechanism of the release (or leakage) still remains unclear, the uptake has been suggested to occur via a H+-coupled plasma membrane carrier protein (Bush, 1993; Schobert et al., 2000). This release/retrieval in mesophyll is considered to regulate the levels of sugars in the mesophyll apoplasm and/or to achieve an effective channeling to actual releasing cells in the phloem. However, localization of SUT to the plasma membrane of source leaf mesophyll cells has not been shown to date (but cf. Lemoine et al., 1989).
For sucrose release from the cytosol to the apoplasm, a carrier-mediated transport system has been suggested to exist in the plasma membrane of source leaves (see Van Bel, 1993; Schobert et al., 2000; Lalonde et al., 2004). This plasma membrane efflux protein is thought to localize to sucrose-releasing cells in the phloem, most likely in phloem parenchyma cells, and facilitate the export of sucrose from the cells to the phloem apoplasm by an unascertained mechanism, presumably H+-antiport or uniport, considering acidic pH and low sucrose concentrations in the apoplasm. To date, however, no such efflux protein has been identified in plant cells. A. thaliana AtSUC3 and sugarcane ShSUT1 have been shown to localize to the cells adjacent to the phloem in leaves (Meyer et al., 2000; Rae et al., 2005), providing a possible mechanism for the release of sucrose toward the phloem if they were to function bi-directionally. This notion has gained support following the demonstration that the sucrose/H+ symporter can mediate the efflux of sucrose in Vicia faba leaf discs (M’Batchi and Delrot, 1988), in tobacco leaf plasma membrane vesicles (Borstlap and Shuurmans, 2004), and in oocytes when heterologously expressed (Carpaneto et al., 2005). The existence of sucrose effluxers can also be inferred in the post-phloem unloading pathway in sink tissues such as developing seeds (see Section IV.C). In addition, it should be noted that vesicle-mediated transport might possibly be another mechanism for sucrose efflux to the apoplasm when the sucrose stored temporally in vacuoles is remobilized (see Echeverría, 2000). In this case, vacuolar sugar porters may play roles in transporting sucrose across the tonoplast membrane (see Echeverría, 2000; Lalonde et al., 2004). In fact, localization of SUT proteins to the tonoplast membranes of mesophyll cells has recently been reported for barley HvSUT2, A. thaliana AtSUC4 and Lotus japonicus LjSUT4, all of which are members of Type-III SUTs (Endler et al., 2006; Reinders et al., 2008). However, metabolic and physiological functions of these vacuolar sucrose/H+ symporters remain unclear.
III. Long-Distance Transport (Translocation) of Sucrose
Following phloem loading in minor veins, sucrose is accumulated in major vein phloem through the leaf vein network, and then translocated to the other parts of plant. The phloem in major veins, petioles, stems and roots functions as pipes to connect source leaves with terminal sinks such as root tips, shoot apices, flower tissues and developing seeds, and is often termed the ‘transport phloem’ (see Van Bel, 2003). At present it is generally accepted that not only loading and unloading control the mass flow of phloem sap, but that the transport phloem also plays a role. (see Willenbrink, 2002; Van Bel, 2003; Minchin and Lacointe, 2005)
A. Retrieval Role of Sucrose Transporters in Transport Phloem
As mentioned in Section I, sucrose is the major osmotically active molecule in the phloem sap of most plant species. However, as sieve tubes are essentially leaky pipes, sucrose and other solutes are readily lost from the phloem sap during translocation (reviewed in Van Bel, 2003). In this context, one can presume the necessity of sucrose-retrieving mechanism(s) in the SE/CC complex of transport phloem, in order to return sucrose leaked to the phloem apoplasm (Willenbrink, 2002; Van Bel, 2003).
In fact, Grimm et al. (1990) have reported that the efflux of sucrose in the petioles of Cyclamen persicum is compensated by carrier-mediated influx, suggesting the existence of sucrose/H+ symporter in the phloem. Ayre et al. (2003) compared the distribution of endogenous translocating sugars (sucrose and/or RFOs) to that of exotic solutes (galactinol and octopine) loaded in leaf minor veins, using tobacco, which translocates predominantly sucrose, and Coleus blumei, an RFO-translocating species. While either the endogenous solutes or the exotic solutes were efficiently exported from the leaf lamina to the petioles through the sieve tubes, only the exotics were found to accumulate in substantial amount to the petiole apoplasm. From the results, the authors have proposed the existence of retention and retrieval mechanism(s) specific for endogenous translocating sugars in the transport phloem (Ayre et al., 2003).
Despite the fact that mRNAs of SUTs have been found in petioles, stems and/or roots in most plants examined, much less attention has been paid until recently to SUTs in the transport phloem than to those involved in loading and unloading. Localization of SUT proteins in the SE/CC of transport phloem has been reported in a number of plant species. In wheat, for example, TaSUT1 protein has been shown to localize to SEs along the transport phloem of leaf blades, leaf sheaths and peduncles (Aoki et al., 2003). Similar localization patterns of SUT protein in the phloem along the long distance transport pathway has been reported in rice for OsSUT1 (Scofield et al., 2007b). In tomato petioles and stems, the co-localization of three different SUT proteins in the same SE has been shown (Reinders et al., 2002). These three tomato SUTs, LeSUT1, SUT2 and SUT4, possess distinctive structures and show different affinities for sucrose in vitro, suggesting different physiological roles in the transport phloem (Riesmeier et al., 1993; Barker et al., 2000; Weise et al., 2000). It seems likely that the SE/CC complex of transport phloem deploys different SUTs in order to avoid critical losses of sucrose from the phloem sap and to maintain an efficient rate of translocation (Willenbrink, 2002; Van Bel, 2003; Ayre et al., 2003). SUT expression in ‘non-loading’ phloem has also been shown in the stem and tuber of potato (Kühn et al., 1997, 2003), in the petiole of celery, a mannitol-translocating species (Noiraud et al., 2000, 2001), and in the transport phloem of Alonsoa meridionalis, an RFO-translocating, symplasmic phloem loader (Knop et al., 2001, 2004). It is therefore reasonable to assume that ‘retrieving apoplasmic sucrose’, rather than ‘phloem loading’, is a more general role for the SUTs in the SE/CC among higher plants.
Moreover, studies using promoter-reporter constructs and specific antibodies have revealed that SUT genes are expressed in a variety of non-phloem cells in both source and sink tissues, including distal cells such as root tips, pollen grains, fiber cells, trichomes and guard cells (Meyer et al., 2000, 2004; Barth et al., 2003; Rae et al., 2005; also see Section IV) and more recently, vessel-associated cells in the xylem of walnut, a woody species (Decourteix et al., 2006). While one can speculate a role of SUT in ‘utilizing extracellular sucrose’, this may possibly extend the physiological significance of SUT genes beyond translocation and carbon partitioning. This possible diversity in physiological function of SUT may explain why higher plants possess a multi-gene family encoding sucrose/H+ symporters.
B. Carbohydrate Storage in Stems
Petioles, stems and roots of the plant are also known to function as lateral sinks (or axial sinks) for storing assimilates, as well as pipes for assimilate translocation from source leaves to terminal sinks. Here we discuss the transport of sucrose between phloem and storage cells in stems, focusing on some agriculturally important grass species, in which the stem storage of assimilates has a significant influence on yield.
1. Stem Carbohydrate Reserves in Cereal Species
In some cereal crops, temporal storage of carbohydrate in the stem has been known to contribute substantially to final grain yield (see Cock and Yoshida, 1972; Schnyder, 1993). The stem of grass species comprises the leaf sheaths, the internodes and the peduncle, connecting the nodes. These stem parts save excess photoassimilates when photosynthetic activity is high in source leaves, and accumulate these carbon reserves in the form of polysaccharides such as starch (in rice) or fructan (in wheat and barley). In this ‘accumulation’ phase, the storage parenchyma cells synthesize and store polysaccharides (starch or fructan) from sucrose in particular organelles (plastid or vacuole, respectively). The stored polysaccharides are remobilized and translocated to filling grains later when the leaf photosynthesis declines due to senescence. In this ‘remobilization’ phase, the stored polysaccharides are degraded within the organelle, exported into the cytosol, and converted into sucrose. Not surprisingly, changes in carbohydrate metabolism enzymes during this sink-to-source transition in the stem of cereal species have been shown at the biochemical and molecular levels (Hirose et al., 1999, 2006; Wardlaw and Willenbrink, 2000; Van den Ende et al., 2003; Hirose and Terao, 2004; Takahashi et al., 2005; Scofield et al., 2009; and references therein). However, further studies are necessary to clarify the synthesis and degradation pathway of polysaccharides, particularly metabolite transport processes across organelle membranes in storage cells.
Apart from the changes in metabolic pathway within storage cells, intercellular transport of sucrose between phloem SEs and storage cells could also change during the sink-to-source transition; phloem unloading in the sink phase along a sucrose gradient, and reloading in the source phase, presumably against a sucrose gradient. However, little information is available to date on solute transport in mature cereal stems. In wheat internodes, unlike in stems of some dicots (reviewed in Van Bel, 1995), fluorescent dyes can move symplasmically from the phloem to the storage parenchyma, via plasmodesmata (Aoki et al., 2004). Further studies are required on intercellular connections via plasmodesmata, and on expression and localization of transporter proteins, as well as sucrose-related enzymes. Hirose et al. (1999) have reported that OsSUT1 mRNAs appear to increase during the sink-to-source transition in rice leaf sheaths, in parallel with mRNAs for sucrose biosynthetic enzymes. This SUT may be involved in the transport path to reload sucrose into the phloem in the remobilization phase.
The sink-to-source transition in stems of cereal species, unlike that in developing leaves (see Section IV.A), occurs in the mature tissues that have already completed their development. Thus cereal stems are of particular use for studying the mechanism of this drastic change in carbon partitioning. It would be very interesting to investigate this phenomenon intensively from the perspectives of tissue and cellular anatomy, enzyme equipment for carbohydrate metabolism, symplasmic connections for solute transport, and/or transcript and protein profiles.
2. Sucrose Accumulation in Sugarcane Stems
Sugarcane, another grass species, accumulates a great quantity of sucrose in the internode and thus is the major source of commercial sugar. In maturing sugarcane internodes that are actively accumulating sucrose, it has been suggested that solutes can move symplasmically from the phloem to the storage parenchyma cells (Jacobsen et al., 1992; Rae et al., 2005). In the maturing internodes, cells at the periphery of the vascular bundle have been found to possess lignified and suberized walls, potentially forming a barrier to apoplasmic movement between phloem and storage cells, and these thick-walled cells employ a SUT protein, ShSUT1, presumably in a retrieval role in non-phloem cells (Rae et al., 2005). As well as the symplasmic pathway of sucrose transport, an apoplasmic pathway has also been proposed where sucrose is released to the internode apoplasm and cleaved by a cell wall invertase, followed by uptake via a hexose transporter and synthesis of sucrose within the cell (Walsh et al., 1996). Moreover, Casu et al. (2003) have reported that maturing internodes express a number of putative sugar transporters, as well as known sucrose and hexose transporters.
IV. Import of Sucrose to Sink Tissues
A. Sink Leaves
It has been elegantly shown by Oparka et al. (1999) that in the young dicot sink leaves but not source leaves, functional symplasmic connections exist between the phloem SEs and the adjacent mesophyll cells. These experiments indicated that the plasmodesmatal connections between the phloem SEs and mesophyll tissues became branched and ceased to pass green fluorescent protein- (GFP-) tagged virus or fluorescent dyes following the developmental transition from sink to source status which occurs in a wave from the base of the leaf to the tip (Oparka et al., 1999). It is not clear how the structural changes in plasmodesmata relate to the gating of these channels or what signal transduction pathway is responsible for the closure of the plasmodesmata, however, it appears that there is a symplasmic pathway present for post-phloem delivery of sucrose to the sink cells of the young leaf. Experiments with tracer dyes (Haupt et al., 2001; Aoki et al., 2004) indicate that a similar symplasmic connection also exists in sink leaf tissue of cereals but not in mature source leaves. Patrick and Offler (1996) support the thesis that in both young leaves and roots, sucrose is delivered symplasmically. These authors point out that by comparing measured sugar transport rates between plant tissues (such as phloem sieve tube to companion cell and seed maternal tissue to filial tissue) it appears that two orders of magnitude higher fluxes are possible through plasmodesmatal connections as compared to apoplasmic active transport (Patrick and Offler, 1996). The existence of a symplasmic pathway for sugar import to source leaves seems at odds, however, with the observation that hexose transporters and cell wall invertase are expressed at high levels in young sink leaf tissue and in roots (reviewed in Roitsch and Tanner, 1996). The presence of these proteins suggests that sucrose could be delivered into the apoplasm from the phloem where it is cleaved by cell wall invertase then taken up actively into the sink cells by hexose transporters. Paradoxically, all 5 OsSUT genes in rice are also expressed in young sink leaves (Aoki et al., 2004). The presence of sucrose synthase and SUTs, invertase and hexose transporters and functional plasmodesmata in sink leaves makes it difficult to make a clear pronouncement as to the route of post-phloem carbon import to sink leaf tissues. A likely scenario, however, is that in a similar model to that described above for long-distance transport and storage in stem tissue, symplasmic import maybe the main route for sugar flux, with transporters acting in a retrieval mode to rescue sugars from the apoplasm. This model is supported by the observation that ectopic expression of invertase in the apoplasm of solanaceous species did not appear to affect early leaf development but had profound effects on source leaf gene expression, photosynthesis, carbohydrate composition and senescence (Sonnewald et al., 1991).
B. Floral Tissues
Sugar transport plays a pivotal role at three major stages of flowering and pollen development. Firstly, the developing pollen grain must be nourished with sugars from the maternal tissues of the anther (Dorion et al., 1996; Roitsch et al., 2003), secondly sugar transporters are thought to be important for anther dehiscence (Stadler et al., 1999) and lastly, sugars and SUTs are of pivotal importance in pollen tube growth during pollen germination (Stadler et al., 1999; Hackel et al., 2006; Sivitz et al., 2008). Recently, the pathway of sugar import to pollen grains during development has been studied intensively using a molecular/biochemical approach, driven by a desire to understand the processes underlying environmental stress effects on pollen fertility (Koonjul et al., 2005) and the physiological role of sugar transporters in pollen and anthers (Imlau et al., 1999; Stadler et al., 1999; Lemoine et al., 1999). A pivotal study by Imlau and co-workers has demonstrated the locations of the apoplasmic barriers to solute delivery during pollen development (Imlau et al., 1999). These authors reported that in A. thaliana transformed with GFP driven by the AtSUC2 promoter, GFP could traffic in the phloem and be unloaded symplasmically in sink tissues such as the anther. This evidence of symplasmic connections between phloem SEs and anther tissue is consistent with dye feeding experiments which suggest that the major barrier to symplasmic transport between the phloem and the pollen occurs at the level of the tapetum. These observations are also consistent with the effects of temperature and drought stress on pollen fertility in rice (Sheoran and Saini, 1996; Oliver et al., 2005) and wheat (Dorion et al., 1996; Koonjul et al., 2005). In cereals, under stress conditions, import of sugars to the pollen grain is impaired due to down regulation of a cell wall invertase and presumably a hexose transporter (Koonjul et al., 2005; Oliver et al., 2005). Sugars and starch build up in the anther and pollen is starved of sugars for starch formation, resulting in low fertility (Sheoran and Saini, 1996). Pollen fertility seems particularly sensitive to this stress around pollen microspore stage, i.e., at meiosis (Oliver et al., 2005). Interestingly, SUTs have also been reported to express in anther tissues of rice and in pollen (Takeda et al., 2001; T. Hirose, G.N. Scofield, N. Aoki and R.T. Furbank, unpublished observations). Whether a switch from the cell wall invertase / hexose transporter couple to the SUT / sucrose synthase sugar import system occurs when pollen develops (similar to that seen in developing seed, see Section IV.C), remains to be elucidated.
C. Developing Seeds
While there still may be controversy concerning the pathway of phloem loading in leaves, there is little doubt that post-phloem transport of sucrose into filial tissue of both monocot and dicot seeds must occur apoplasmically. In all higher plants, the filial and maternal tissues of seeds are separated by the plasma membrane of both tissues with no functional plasmodesmatal connections remaining post-fertilization (see Patrick and Offler, 1995).
1. Dicot Seeds
In dicots, there is strong support for the model that in early seed development, sucrose is delivered from the phloem to the inner seed coat where it passes by processes unknown to the apoplasm and is cleaved by cell wall invertase. Hexoses are subsequently imported to the embryo via hexose transporters (reviewed by Weber et al., 1997; summarized in Fig. 28.5). Following contact of the cotyledons of the embryo with the inner seed coat, invertase and hexose transporter expression are markedly reduced and a SUT is highly expressed in the cotyledonary epidermis, coinciding with the high level expression of sucrose synthase within the cotyledon (reviewed in Weber et al., 1997; summarized in Fig. 28.5). While evidence for this developmental change in sugar import pathways has been generated from the model system Vicia faba, it appears from works in common plantain (Gahrtz et al., 1996), canola (King et al., 1997), cotton (Ruan et al., 2001), A. thaliana (Ruuska et al., 2002; Baud et al., 2005; Fallahi et al., 2008), that this may be an ubiquitous mechanism in dicot seeds. This transition in sugar import pathways is thought to herald the onset of storage product accumulation and the cessation of cell division. While the other (possibly hormonal) signaling compounds involved in this developmental switch remain unresolved, it has been proposed that sugar signaling, in particular the hexose to sucrose ratio, is pivotal in controlling this process (see Weber et al., 1997). Evidence for the importance of sugar signaling in the transition from cell division to cell expansion has also been reported from measurements of local sugar levels across sections of developing V. faba embryos (Borisjuk et al., 1998, 2002) where areas of active cell division correlated with high hexose to sucrose ratios. Also, in transgenic Vicia narbonensis seeds, expressing a yeast invertase targeted to the apoplasm, sugar levels were seriously affected and development of the embryo disrupted (Weber et al., 1998; Neubohn et al., 2000). In transgenic chickpeas harboring a similar gene construct, cell number was increased, starch and protein deposition were greatly reduced in high invertase expressing lines and germination was also disrupted, presumably by the persistence of this enzyme activity through desiccation and after rehydration (R.T. Furbank, P. Gremigni, D. Büssis and N. Turner, unpublished observations). It is interesting to note, however, that the developmental switch from hexose import to sucrose import which occurs in legumes in concert with the onset of storage phase may not be pertinent to oilseeds with a persistent endosperm such as tobacco (Tomlinson et al., 2004). In this case, 30-fold overexpression of an invertase in the embryo and seed coat apoplasm, with associated large changes in hexose levels, had no deleterious effects on seed filling (Tomlinson et al., 2004).
In the post-phloem sugar transport pathway of dicot seeds, the step which remains to be resolved is the mechanism of export of sucrose from the maternal seed coat. Sucrose is believed to move symplasmically from the phloem SEs to the cells of the inner seed coat. Sucrose must then move into the apoplasm surrounding the embryo and the inner seed coat cells to be cleared by cell wall invertase or to be actively taken up by the cotyledonary epidermal cells via SUTs (see Fig. 28.5). From the sucrose gradients between maternal tissues and the apoplasm calculated for Phaseolus vulgaris and V. faba (Patrick and Offler, 1995) simple diffusion could only support 40–50% of the flux in this transport step and carrier mediated efflux has been proposed (Patrick and Offler, 1995). A carrier mediated efflux is also supported by the inhibition of sucrose efflux from seed coats by the sulfhydryl inhibitor PCMBS and the sensitivity of this transport process to inhibition of respiration (reviewed in Patrick and Offler, 1995). Presumably, for sucrose export into the apoplasm, a sucrose/H+ antiporter would be required. No such protein has been cloned or characterized to date. Intriguingly, SUT protein and RNA have been detected at high levels in the maternal seed coat tissues of a range of dicot seeds (in pea, Tegeder et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2007; in V. faba, Weber et al., 1997; in P. vulgaris, Zhou et al., 2007; in common plantain, Lauterbach et al., 2007; and in canola, R.T. Furbank, unpublished observations). It has been postulated (see Patrick and Offler, 1995) that the sucrose/H+ symporters could operate in the reverse direction as sucrose effluxers in seed coat transfer cells, either actively or as a passive pore. Recently this notion has gained more credence as the maize ZmSUT1 gene product has been shown to be bidirectional when expressed in oocytes (Carpaneto et al., 2005). More recently, Zhou et al. (2007) discovered novel proteins being classified into either Type-I or Type-II SUTs in seed coats of developing seeds of pea and bean. When expressed in yeast, these SUT-like proteins exhibited kinetic and biochemical properties of pH-independent facilitator, and thus were named SUFs (sucrose facilitators). The SUFs are expressed in cells that are considered responsible for sucrose efflux from seed coats, suggesting that SUFs can play a role in releasing sucrose from seed coat cells by facilitated diffusion according to an outward-directed gradient of sucrose across the plasma membrane (Zhou et al., 2007).
2. Cereal Grains
In contrast to dicot seeds, sugar import to cereal grains received only limited attention until relatively recently. The proposed pathway of import of sugars to cereal endosperm is shown in Fig. 28.5. It has long been known that sugar import from the maternal nucellus tissue to the endosperm requires transport across the apoplasm and that uptake of sugars across the aleurone layer surrounding the endosperm is energy dependent (see Patrick and Offler, 1995). The sugar transporters responsible for this process, however, were not cloned and localized until the last decade. OsSUT1, the first cereal SUT cloned (see above and Hirose et al., 1997) has been shown to be highly expressed during grain filling and to be localized to the aleurone/subaleurone and nucellus tissue around the top of the grain, closer to the nucellar projection (Furbank et al., 2001). Antisense suppression of this gene caused carbon starvation of the endosperm and a shriveled grain phenotype (Scofield et al., 2002). Similar expression patterns have been found for HvSUT1 in barley (Weschke et al., 2000), and for TaSUT1 in wheat (Bagnall et al., 2000; Aoki et al., 2002).
Whether the proposed dicot model for a switch from an invertase / hexose uptake mechanism early in development to a sucrose uptake mechanism during starch accumulation holds for cereal seeds is still under investigation. It appears from measurements of transcript levels of cell wall invertases and hexose transporters during development of rice grains (Hirose et al., 2002) and barley grains (Weschke et al., 2003) that hexoses are indeed taken up by the endosperm early in grain development. Transcript profiling in barley however, shows that sucrose synthase is also important in early development for providing UDP-glucose required in cellularization of the endosperm (Sreenivasulu et al., 2004).
The pathway of sugar import to maize kernels is less well characterized than in the other cereals and may deviate from the model for rice, wheat and barley. Early in development, hexoses produced by the action of cell wall invertase in the maternal pedicel tissues are taken up by the endosperm basal transfer cells, presumably by a hexose transporter (see Patrick and Offler, 1995). This pathway of early sugar import is supported by analysis of the maize miniature mutant, a cell wall invertase knock out, which has smaller grains, lower hexose levels, lower cell numbers and reduced endosperm mitotic activity (Vilhar et al., 2002). Curiously, the maize sh1 mutant, a sucrose synthase (SS1) knock out with obviously shrunken grain, shows only a mild reduction in starch content but early degradation of endosperm cell integrity (see Chourey et al., 1998; and references therein). The mutant Sus1-1 (a mutation in sucrose synthase isoform SS2, believed to be responsible for starch biosynthesis), has no obvious phenotype while a double mutant in both isoforms has less than 0.5% of typical sucrose synthase activity in the endosperm (Chourey et al., 1998) but still synthesizes approximately 50% of normal levels of starch (Chourey et al., 1998). This observation implies that the invertase / hexose transport pathway may be active throughout maize kernel development and both sucrose itself and hexoses may be imported during starch biosynthesis.
As with developing dicot seeds, the post-phloem efflux of sucrose from maternal tissues is also somewhat of a mystery in cereal seeds. While the cells of the nucellus in wheat appear to be symplasmically connected and continuous with the phloem (see Patrick and Offler, 1995), the efflux of sucrose from the nucellar projection is sensitive to sulfhydryl inhibitors and uncouplers (Bagnall et al., 2000). Consistent with these observations, SUT1 transcript and protein are detected in the nucellus tissues of both wheat (Bagnall et al., 2000) and rice (Furbank et al., 2001). Once again, in the absence of the discovery of any candidate genes for sucrose effluxers, it is tempting to speculate a role for SUTs in the efflux of sugar from the maternal tissue into the filial apoplasm where it is taken up by the same protein located in the aleurone acting in uptake mode.
Besides carrier-mediated sugar transport, it has been reported recently that inhibitors for endocytosis have been shown to prevent the conversion of 14C-sucrose into starch in developing barley endosperm, suggesting that vesicle-mediated transport of sucrose may contribute to apoplasmic transport of sucrose in grains during starch accumulation (Baroja-Fernandez et al., 2006). The presence of endocytic transport system for sucrose uptake into sink tissues has also been proposed in potato tubers and citrus fruits (Etxeberria et al., 2005; Baroja-Fernandez et al., 2006). Further studies are required to evaluate whether sugar transport by endocytosis contributes in vivo to the uptake of translocated assimilates into sink cells.
D. “Fleshy” Fruits
The discussion above has focused primarily on the import of photosynthate to the embryo of dicot seeds and the endosperm of cereal seeds: the primary site of storage in many agriculturally important species. Also of interest is the pathway of sugar import to fruiting structures where maternal tissue is the major carbon storage organ. The systems most studied are tomato fruit, grape berry and cotton seed. In tomato fruit, there is a developmental transition from symplasmic continuity between storage parenchyma and phloem SEs early in fruit formation to symplasmic isolation and the expression of a hexose transporter and cell wall invertase in parenchyma tissue (Ruan and Patrick, 1995). This change in transport mechanism may coincide with the transition from starch storage to accumulation of high concentrations of hexoses in the fruit. In grape berry (Coombe, 1992), it appears that sucrose can move symplasmically from the phloem to the vascular parenchyma cells and is then delivered to the apoplasm where it is taken up by the mesocarp cells (see Patrick and Offler, 1996). Comprehensive developmental studies have not been carried out but it appears that this active uptake takes place via cell wall invertase coupled to hexose transporters in the mesocarp flesh cells (Davies and Robinson, 1996; Fillion et al., 1999). However, high-level expression of a SUT in the same tissue is also observed during berry ripening, suggesting that sucrose itself may also be actively transported (Ageorges et al., 2000).
Cotton fiber is an important example of a crop plant where the major storage tissue is maternal in origin. Cotton fiber initiates as a single cell from the ovule epidermis at flowering then elongates to a length of up to 3 cm in the space of 15 to 20 days after flowering (see Ruan et al., 2001). The major storage compound in cotton fiber is cellulose and mature fiber can be comprised of over 90% cellulose by dry weight. Apart from the importance of this fiber in textile production, it has been shown to be a valuable model for cell elongation and solute transport in rapidly elongating tissue (Ruan et al., 2000, 2001). Sugars move into the cotton fiber symplasmically from the seed coat during early development then during the rapid elongation phase, plasmodesmata joining the fiber cells to the underlying seed coat are gated, no longer passing solutes or the fluorescent dye 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF), from the seed coat vascular bundle to the fiber (Fig 28.5). Sucrose and potassium transporters are highly expressed at this stage, causing turgor to increase dramatically in the fibers, driving the rapid elongation phase (Ruan et al., 2001). Plasmodesmata then reopen at the end of elongation, followed by a phase of rapid cellulose deposition. The appearance of callose around the neck of the plasmodesmata correlates with this closure and the reopening correlates with the expression of a fiber-specific β-glucanase, thought to degrade the callose constriction of the pore (Ruan et al., 2004, 2005). This is an important example of how the symplasmic pathway of solute transport can be restricted and then resumed during development (see Oparka and Roberts, 2001; Roberts and Oparka, 2003).
E. Roots and Tubers
Sugar import to roots and tubers has been extensively studied in the species potato and sugar beet which store substantial carbon reserves in below ground tissues (see Patrick and Offler, 1995; Bell and Leigh, 1996). Viola et al. (2001) reported evidence that the pathway of post-phloem transport of sugars into the stolon of potato changed with development. These authors observed an apoplasmic step early in stolon swelling and expansion but symplasmic connectivity with the phloem SEs later, during starch deposition (Viola et al., 2001). Localization of cell wall invertase expression suggests that this enzyme may be important early in development and in the apical bud region of the tuber. These observations may explain why overexpression of a yeast invertase in the apoplasm of potato increased tuber size (Sonnewald et al., 1997) if developmental expression patterns of this enzyme are important in determining cell number through sugar signaling early in stolon development and in termination of apical growth.
Post-phloem movement of sucrose into root tissues of non-tuber forming species has been studied in less detail, but elegant experiments using laser confocal microscopy and the phloem mobile fluorescent dye, 6-CF have shown that in root tips, a symplasmic domain extends from the phloem SEs to the meristematic tissue (Oparka et al., 1994, 1995).
F. Germinating Seeds
Seed germination is an interesting system for the study of sugar transport as the machinery which was involved in carbon storage during seed development becomes source tissue to fuel shoot and root growth in the next generation. The process of seed germination has been extensively studied in cereals from the focus of starch remobilization and hormonal control of gene expression (Bewley, 1997). Until recently, however, little was known about the pathway of sugar movement from the cereal endosperm to the shoot and root or from embryo storage tissues to the embryonic axis and growing tissues of the dicot germinating seed. Relevant to the apoplasmic transport pathway, SUT transcripts had been detected in phloem tissues of castor bean (Bick et al., 1998) and rice (Matsukura et al., 2000), suggesting that sucrose is synthesized from storage reserves and translocated in the phloem of seedling shoots. The role of non-phloem tissues in sucrose transport during seed germination is less certain. In germinating castor bean seeds, epidermal transfer cells of cotyledons abutting the endosperm contain abundant SUT mRNAs (Bick et al., 1998). However, the function of these SUTs in sugar retrieval from the endosperm is unclear as the starch hydrolysis products are generally known to be glucose and maltose. In cereal species, rice OsSUT1 (Hirose et al., 1997; Matsukura et al., 2000), wheat TaSUT1 (Aoki et al., 2002) and maize ZmSUT1 (Aoki et al., 1999) have been found to be highly expressed in germinating seeds. In rice, OsSUT1 appeared to be expressed dominantly in germinating seeds compared with the other four SUT isogenes (Aoki et al., 2003), and anti-sense suppression lines for OsSUT1 showed retarded germination (Scofield et al., 2002). These results strongly suggest that expression of the SUT1 ortholog is very important for seed germination in cereal species. However, cellular localization of SUT1 expression in germinating cereal seeds has not been fully investigated. In rice, the expression of OsSUT1 gene and the localization of OsSUT1 protein in the scutellum phloem of germinating seeds have been reported (Matsukura et al., 2000; Scofield et al., 2007a). Recent evidence from 6-CF feeding suggests that in wheat, the major barrier to symplasmic movement of sugars from the endosperm to the shoot and root is the scutellar epidermis (Aoki et al., 2006). A single symplasmic domain is then present from the scutellar ground cells to the phloem, shoot and root. TaSUT1 is expressed in the scutellar epidermis and ground cells, in addition to the protophloem/phloem SEs. There is good evidence that sucrose is synthesized in the scutellum from glucose released from starch degradation in the endosperm (Edelman et al., 1959). A model of sugar transport during cereal seed germination is shown in Fig. 28.6. Glucose or maltose are transported actively across the scutellar epidermis, then sucrose synthesized in the scutellum can move either symplasmically or apoplasmically (via SUT) to the phloem tissues. Unloading in the root and shoot is assumed to be symplasmic. It is intriguing that TaSUT1 is expressed in the scutellum epithelial cells which are in contact predominantly with glucose and maltose during the germination process (Aoki et al., 2006). In many species, SUTs will also support maltose transport (see Lemoine, 2000), raising the possibility that SUT proteins are also responsible for maltose uptake into the embryo from the endosperm.
V. Sucrose Transporters as Sucrose Sensors?
There has been a great deal of controversy over the potential “dual function” of SUTs as sugar sensors and sugar transporters (Chiou and Bush, 1998; Lalonde et al., 1999; Barker et al., 2000; Schulze et al., 2000; Barth et al., 2003). Claims that SUTs could act as sucrose sensors gained impetus with the cloning of the dicot SUT2 type transporters, located in SEs of tomato, A. thaliana and common plantain (Barker et al., 2000; Schulze et al., 2000; Barth et al., 2003). These SUTs are characterized by extended cytoplasmic domains which show some similarity to the SNF3 and RGT2 yeast sugar sensors (Barker et al., 2000). The solanaceous SUT2 proteins were capable of little or no sucrose transport after heterologous expression in yeast (Barker et al., 2000; Reinders et al., 2002). These observations, while rather circumstantial in nature, were later supported by evidence that SUT2 co-localized with SUT1 and SUT4 in phloem SEs in potato and SUT1, 4 and 2 show some ability to form homo-oligomers and interact with each other in an in vitro system (Reinders et al., 2002). Doubt has been cast on these conclusions, however, as in common plantain, not only did the SUT2 homolog PmSUC3 not co-localize with the putative phloem loading sucrose porter PmSUC2, but carried out high rates of sucrose transport in yeast cells (Barth et al., 2003). Whether the Solanaceae are unique or data have been subject to overenthusiastic interpretation is yet to be determined.
VI. Concluding Remarks
Sucrose transport in higher plants has been and remains to be a “hot” area of research in plant biology, characterized by a great deal of controversy and debate. Perhaps a more interesting way of dealing with concluding comments from this chapter is to frame some questions, answers and unresolved conundrums. A few are set out below.
How is the phloem loaded? Apoplasmically by SUTs in the easily transformed dicot species but which class of SUT is responsible is still unclear. Loading mechanisms in graminaceous species are still unresolved and the relative role of plasmodesmata in this process remains a mystery. Why are SUTs so ubiquitous throughout plant tissues, both source and sink, which both export and import sucrose, when SUTs are traditionally regarded as sucrose importers? How is the phloem unloaded? Once again, there is often a clear symplasmic pathway in many sink tissues but SUTs are still expressed in these tissues and presumably can function in retrieval to keep sucrose “on track” and out of the apoplasm. How is sucrose released to the apoplasm, via SUTs or specific effluxers? What does the tonoplast sucrose importer/exporter look like? Do vesicle-mediated transport systems, namely exo- and endocytosis, contribute to apoplasmic transport of sucrose in vivo? Do SUTs really form homo- and hetero-oligomeric complexes in vivo and can they act as sensors analogous to the yeast glucose sensors? Why do so many A. thaliana sugar transport knock-outs (including the putative sucrose sensor mutants) show no phenotype and potentially a high level of redundancy? How do higher plants control SUTs and the bulk-flow of phloem sap?
Rarely has an area of research progressed so quickly from a molecular viewpoint but thrown up so many challenges to our understanding of such an important process in higher plants.
Abbreviations
- CC –:
-
Companion cell;
- CF –:
-
Carboxyfluorescein;
- GFP –:
-
Green fluorescent protein;
- PCMBS –:
-
Para-chloromercuribenzylsulphonic acid;
- RFO –:
-
Raffinose-family oligosaccharide;
- SE –:
-
Sieve element;
- SUT –:
-
Sucrose transporter
References
Ageorges A, Issaly N, Picaud S, Delrot S and Romieu C (2000) Identification and functional expression in yeast of a grape berry sucrose carrier. Plant Physiol Biochem 38: 177–185
Aoki N, Hirose T, Takahashi S, Ono K, Ishimaru K and Ohsugi R (1999) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a gene for a sucrose transporter in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Physiol 40: 1072–1078
Aoki N, Whitfeld P, Hoeren F, Scofield G, Newell K, Patrick J, Offler C, Clarke B, Rahman S and Furbank RT (2002) Three sucrose transporter genes are expressed in the developing grain of hexaploid wheat. Plant Mol Biol 50: 453–462
Aoki N, Hirose T, Scofield GN, Whitfeld PR and Furbank RT (2003) The sucrose transporter gene family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 44: 223–232
Aoki N, Scofield GN, Wang X-D, Patrick JW, Offler CE and Furbank RT (2004) Expression and localization analysis of the wheat sucrose transporter TaSUT1 in vegetative tissues. Planta 219: 176–184
Aoki N, Scofield GN, Wang, X-D Offler, CE, Patrick JW and Furbank RT (2006) Expression studies indicate sugar transporters play key roles in germinating wheat seeds. Plant Physiol 141: 1255–1263
Ayre BG, Keller F and Turgeon R (2003) Symplastic continuity between companion cells and the translocation stream: long-distance transport is controlled by retention and retrieval mechanisms in the phloem. Plant Physiol 131: 1518–1528
Bagnall N, Wang X-D, Scofield GN, Furbank RT, Offler CE and Patrick JW (2000) Sucrose transport-related genes are expressed in both maternal and filial tissues of developing wheat grains. Aust J Plant Physiol 27: 1009–1020
Barker L, Kühn C, Weise A, Schulz A, Gebhardt C, Hirner B, Hellmann H, Schulze W, Ward JM and Frommer WB (2000) SUT2, a putative sucrose sensor in sieve elements. Plant Cell 12: 1153–1164
Baroja-Fernandez E, Etxeberria E, Muñoz FJ, Morán-Zorzano MT, Alonso-Casajús N, Gonzalez P and Pozueta-Romero J (2006) An important pool of sucrose linked to starch biosynthesis is taken up by endocytosis in heterotrophic cells. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 447–456
Barth I, Meyer S and Sauer N (2003) PmSUC3: characterization of a SUT2/SUC3-type sucrose transporter from Plantago major. Plant Cell 15: 1375–1385
Baud S, Wuillème S, Lemoine R, Kronenberger J, Caboche M, Lepiniec L and Rochat C (2005) The AtSUC5 sucrose transporter specifically expressed in the endosperm is involved in early seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 43: 824–836
Beebe DU and Russin WA (1999) Plasmodesmata in the phloem-loading pathway. In: Van Bel AJE and Van Kesteren WJP (eds) Plasmodesmata: Structure, Function, Role in Cell Communication, pp 261–294. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Beebe DU and Turgeon R (1992) Localization of galactinol, raffinose, and stachyose synthesis in Cucrbita pepo leaves. Planta 188: 354–361
Bell CI and Leigh RA (1996) Differential effects of turgor on sucrose and potassium transport at the tonoplast and plasma membrane of sugarbeet storage root tissue. Plant Cell Environ 19: 191–200
Bewley (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9: 1055–1066
Bick J-A, Neelam A, Smith E, Nelson SJ, Hall JL and Williams LE (1998) Expression analysis of a sucrose carrier in the germinating seedling of Ricinus communis. Plant Mol Biol 38: 425–435
Boorer KJ, Loo DDF, Frommer WB and Wright EM (1996) Transport mechanism of the cloned potato H+/sucrose cotransporter StSUT1. J Biol Chem 271: 25139–25144
Borisjuk L, Walenta S, Weber H, Muller-Klieser W and Wobus U (1998) High-resolution histographical mapping of glucose concentrations in developing cotyledons of Vicia faba in relation to mitotic activity and storage processes: glucose as a possible developmental trigger. Plant J 15: 583–591
Borisjuk L, Walenta S, Rolletschek H, Muller-Klieser W, Wobus U and Weber H (2002) Spatial analysis of plant metabolism: sucrose imaging within Vicia faba cotyledons reveals specific developmental patterns. Plant J 29: 521–530
Borstlap AC and Shuurmans JAMJ (2004) Sucrose transport into plasma membrane vesicles from tobacco leaves by H+ symport or counter exchange does not display a linear component. J Membrane Biol 198: 31–42
Botha CEJ and Cross RHM (1997) Plasmodesmatal frequency in relation to short-distance transport and phloem loading in leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Phloem is not loaded directly from the symplast. Physiol Plant 99: 355–362
Botha CEJ, Cross RHM, Van Bel AJE and Peter CI (2000) Phloem loading in the sucrose-export-defective (SXD-1) mutant maize is limited by callose deposition at plasmodesmata in bundle sheath-vascular parenchyma interface. Protoplasma 214: 65–72
Braun DM and Slewinski TL (2009) Genetic control of carbon partitioning in grasses: roles of sucrose transporters and tie-dyed loci in phloem loading. Plant Physiol 149: 71–81
Braun DM, Ma Y, Inada N, Muszynski MG and Baker RF (2006) tie-dyed1 regulates carbohydrate accumulation in maize leaves. Plant Physiol 142: 1511–1522
Bürkle L, Hibberd JM, Quick WPK, Kühn C, Hirner B and Frommer WB (1998) The H+-sucrose cotransporter NtSUT1 is essential for sugar export from tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol 118: 59–68
Bush DR (1993) Proton-coupled sugar and amino acid transporters in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 513–542
Carpaneto A, Geiger D, Bamberg E, Sauer N, Fromm J and Hedrich R (2005) Phloem-localized, proton-coupled sucrose carrier ZmSUT1 mediates sucrose efflux under control of sucrose gradient and pmf. J Biol Chem 280: 21437–21443
Casu RE, Grof CPL, Rae AL, McIntyre CL, Dimmock CM and Manners JM (2003) Identification of a novel sugar transporter homologue strongly expressed in mature stem vascular tissues of sugarcane by expressed sequence tag and microarray analysis. Plant Mol Biol 52: 371–386
Chiou TJ and Bush DR (1998) Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 4784–4788
Chourey PS, Taliercio EW, Carlson SJ and Ruan YL (1998) Genetic evidence that the two isozymes of sucrose synthase present in developing maize endosperm are critical, one for cell wall integrity and the other for starch biosynthesis. Mol Gen Genet 259: 88–96
Cock JH and Yoshida S (1972) Accumulation of 14C-labelled carbohydrate before flowering and its subsequent redistribution and respiration in the rice plant. Proc Crop Sci Soc Jpn 41: 226–234
Coombe BG (1992) Research on development and ripening of the grape berry. Am J Enol Vitic 43: 101–110
Davies C and Robinson SP (1996) Sugar accumulation in grape berries: cloning of two putative vacuolar invertase cDNAs and their expression in grapevine tissue. Plant Physiol 111: 275–283
Decourteix M, Alves G, Brunel N, Améglio T, Guilliot A, Lemoine R, Pétel G and Sakr (2006) JrSUT1, a putative xylem sucrose transporter, could mediate sucrose influx into xylem parenchyma cells and be up-regulated by freeze-thaw cycles over the autumn-winter period in walnut tree (Juglans regia L.). Plant Cell Environ 29: 36–47
Dorion S, Lalonde S and Saini HS (1996) Induction of male sterility in wheat by meiotic-stage water deficit is preceded by a decline in invertase activity and changes in carbohydrate metabolism in anthers. Plant Physiol 111: 137–145
Echeverría E (2000) Vesicle-mediated solute transport between the vacuole and the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 123: 1217–1226
Edelman J, Shibko SI and Keys AJ (1959) The role of the scutellum of cereal seedlings in the synthesis and transport of sucrose. J Exp Bot 10: 178–189
Endler A, Meyer S, Schelbert S, Schneider T, Weschke W, Peters SW, Keller F, Baginsky S, Martinoia E and Schmidt UG (2006) Identification of a vacuolar sucrose transporter in barley and Arabidopsis mesophyll cells by a tonoplast proteomic approach. Plant Physiol 141: 196–207
Etxeberria E, Baroja-Fernandez E, Muños FJ and Pozueta-Romero J (2005) Sucrose-inducible endocytosis as a mechanism for nutrient uptake in heterotrophic plant cell. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 474–481
Evert RF, Eschrich W and Heyser W (1978) Leaf structure in relation to solute transport and phloem loading in Zea mays L. Planta 138: 279–294
Evert RF, Russin WA and Botha CEJ (1996) Distribution and frequency of plasmodesmata in relation to photoassimilate pathways and phloem loading in the barley leaf. Planta 198: 572–579
Fallahi H, Scofield GN, Badger MR, Chow WS, Furbank RT and Ruan YL (2008) Localization of sucrose synthase in developing seed and siliques of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals diverse roles for SUS during development. J Ex Bot 59: 3283–3295
Fillion L, Ageorges A, Picaud S, Coutos-Thévenot P, Lemoine R, Romieu C and Derlot S (1999) Cloning and expression of a hexose transporter gene expressed during the ripening of grape berry. Plant Physiol 120: 1083–1093
Fisher DG (1986) Ultrastructure, plasmodesmatal frequency and solute concentration in green areas of variegated Coleus blumei Benth. leaves. Planta 169: 141–152
Fukumorita T and Chino M (1982) Sugar, amino acid and inorganic contents in rice phloem sap. Plant Cell Physiol 23: 273–283
Furbank RT, Scofield GN, Hirose T, Wang X-D, Patrick JW and Offler CE (2001) Cellular localisation and function of a sucrose transporter OsSUT1 in developing rice grains. Aust J Plant Physiol 28: 1187–1196
Gahrtz M, Stolz J and Sauer N (1994) A phloem specific sucrose-H+ symporter from Plantago major L. supports the model of apoplastic phloem loading. Plant J 6: 697–706
Gahrtz M, Schmelzer E, Stolz J and Sauer N (1996) Expression of the PmSUC1 sucrose carrier gene from Plantago major L. is induced during seed development. Plant J 9: 93–100
Gamalei YV (1989) Structure and function of leaf minor veins in trees and herbs. A taxonomic review. Trees 3: 96–110
Gamalei YV (1991) Phloem loading and its development related to plant evolution from trees to herbs. Trees 5: 50–64
Giaquinta RT (1983) Phloem loading of sucrose. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 34: 347–387
Gottwald JR, Krysan PJ, Young JC, Evert RF and Sussman MR (2000) Genetic evidence for the in planta role of phloem-specific plasma membrane sucrose transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13979–13984
Grimm E, Bernhardt G, Rothe K and Jacob F (1990) Mechanism of sucrose retrieval along the phloem path: a kinetic approach. Planta 182: 480–485
Hackel A, Schauer N, Carrari F, Fernie AR, Grimm B and Kühn C (2006) Sucrose transporter LeSUT1 and LeSUT2 inhibition affects tomato fruit development in different ways. Plant J 45: 180–192
Haupt S, Duncan GH, Holzberg S and Oparka KJ (2001) Evidence for symplastic phloem unloading in sink leaves of barley. Plant Physiol 125: 209–218
Haritatos E, Keller F and Turgeon R (1996) Raffinose oligosaccharide concentrations measured in individual cell and tissue types in Cucumis melo L. leaves: implications for phloem loading. Planta 198: 614–622
Hayashi H and Chino M (1986) Collection of pure phloem sap from wheat and its chemical composition. Plant Cell Physiol 27: 1387–1393
Hirose T and Terao T (2004) A comprehensive expression analysis of the starch synthase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 220: 9–16
Hirose T, Imaizumi N, Scofield GN, Furbank RT and Ohsugi R (1997) cDNA cloning and tissue specific expression of a gene for sucrose transporter from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 38: 1389–1396
Hirose T, Endler A and Ohsugi R (1999) Gene expression of enzymes for starch and sucrose metabolism and transport in leaf sheaths of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during the heading period in relation to the sink to source transition. Plant Prod Sci 2: 178–183
Hirose T, Takano M and Terao T (2002) Cell wall invertase in developing rice caryopsis: molecular cloning of OsCIN1 and analysis of its expression in relation to its role in grain filling. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 452–459
Hirose T, Ohdan T, Nakamura Y, Terao T (2006) Expression profiling of genes related to starch synthesis in rice leaf sheaths during the heading period. Physiol Plant 128: 425–435
Hofius D, Hajirezaei M-R, Geiger M, Tschiersch H and Melzer M (2004) RNAi-mediated tocopherol deficiency impairs photoassimilate export in transgenic potato plants. Plant Physiol 135: 1256–1268
Imlau A, Truernit E and Sauer N (1999) Cell-to-cell and long-distance trafficking of the green fluorescent protein in the phloem and symplastic unloading of the protein into sink tissues. Plant Cell 11: 309–322
Ishimaru K, Hirose T, Aoki N, Takahashi S, Ono K, Yamamoto S, Wu J, Saji S, Baba T, Ugaki M, Matsumoto T and Ohsugi R (2001) Antisense expression of a rice sucrose transporter OsSUT1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 42: 1181–1185
Jacobsen KR, Fisher DG, Maretzki A and Moore PH (1992) Developmental changes in the anatomy of the sugarcane stem in relation to phloem unloading and sucrose storage. Bot Acta 105: 70–80
Juchaux-Cachau M, Landouar-Arsivaud L, Pichaut J-P, Campion C, Porcheron B, Jeauffre J, Noiraud-Romy N, Simoneau P, Maurousset L and Lemoine R (2007) Characterization of AgMaT2, a plasma membrane mannitol transporter from celery, expressing in phloem cells, including phloem parenchyma cells. Plant Physiol 145: 62–74
Kaneko M, Chonan N and Matsuda T (1980) Ultrastructure of the small vascular bundles and transfer pathways for photosynthate in the leaves of rice plant. Japan J Crop Sci 49: 42–50 (In Japanese with English summary)
King SP, Lunn JE and Furbank RT (1997) Carbohydrate content and enzyme metabolism in developing canola siliques. Plant Physiol 114: 153–160
Knop C, Voitsekhovskaja O and Lohaus G (2001) Sucrose transporters in two members of the Scrophulariaceae with different types of transport sugar. Planta 213: 80–91
Knop C, Stadler R, Sauer N and Lohaus G (2004) AmSUT1, a sucrose transporter in collection and transport phloem of the putative symplastic phloem loader Alonsoa meridionalis. Plant Physiol 134: 204–214
Koonjul PK, Minhas JS, Nunes C, Sheoran IS and Saini HS (2005) Selective transcriptional down-regulation of anther invertases precedes the failure of pollen development in water-stressed wheat. J Exp Bot 56: 179–190
Krügel U, Veenhoff LM, Langbin J, Wiederhold E, Liesche J, Friedrich T, Grimm B, Martinoia E, Poolman B and Kühn C (2008) Transport and sorting of the Solanum tuberosum sucrose transporter SUT1 is affected by posttranscriptional modification. Plant Cell 20: 2497–2513
Kühn C (2003) A comparison of the sucrose trnasporter systems of different plant species. Plant Biol 5: 215–232
Kühn C, Quick WP, Schulz A Riesmeier JW, Sonnewald U and Frommer WB (1996) Companion cell-specific inhibition of the potato sucrose transporter SUT1. Plant Cell Environ 19: 1115–1123
Kühn C, Franceschi VR, Schulz A, Lemoine R and Frommer WB (1997) Macromolecular trafficking indicated by localization and turnover of sucrose transporters in enucleate sieve elements. Science 275: 1298–1300
Kühn C, Hajirezaei M-R, Fernie AR, Roessner-Tunali U, Czechowski T, Hirner B and Frommer WB (2003) The sucrose transporter StSUT1 localizes to sieve elements in potato tuber phloem and influences tuber physiology and development. Plant Physiol 131: 102–113
Lalonde S, Boles E, Hellmann H, Barker L, Patrick JW, Frommer WB and Ward JM (1999) A dual function of sugar carriers in transport and sugar sensing. Plant Cell 11: 707–726
Lalonde S, Tegeder M, Throne-Holst M, Frommer WB and Patrick JW (2003) Phloem loading and unloading of sugars and amino acids. Plant Cell Environ 26: 37–56
Lalonde S, Wipf D and Frommer WB (2004) Transport mechanism for organic forms of carbon and nitrogen between source and sink. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 341–372
Lauterbach C, Niedermeier M, Besenbeck R, Stadler R and Sauer N (2007) Immunolocalization of the PmSUC1 sucrose transporter in Plantago major flowers and reporter-gene analyses of the PmSUC1 promoter suggest a role in sucrose release from the inner integument. Plant Biol 9: 357–365
Lemoine R (2000) Sucrose transporters in plants: update on function and structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1465: 246–262
Lemoine R, Delrot S, Gallet O and Larsson C (1989) The sucrose carrier of the plant plasma membrane. II. Immunological characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta 978: 65–71
Lemoine R, Kühn C, Thiele N, Delrot S and Frommer WB (1996) Antisense inhibition of the sucrose transporter in potato: effects on amount and activity. Plant Cell Environ 19: 1124–1131
Frommer WB (1999) Identification of a pollen-specific sucrose transporter-like protein NtSUT3 from tobacco. FEBS Lett 454: 325–330
Lu JM-Y and Bush DR (1998) His-65 in the proton--sucrose symporter is an essential amino acid whose modification with site-directed mutagenesis increase transport activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 9025–9030
Ludwig A, Stolz J and Sauer N (2000) Plant sucrose-H+ symporters mediate the transport of vitamin H. Plant J 24: 503–509
Ma Y, Baker F, Magallanes-Lundback M, DellaPenna D and Braun DM (2008) Tie-dyed1 and Sucrose export defevtive1 act independently to promote carbohydrate export from maize leaves. Planta 227: 527–538
Ma Y, Slewinski TL, Baker RF and Braun DM (2009) Tie-dyed1 encodes a novel phloem-expressed transmembrane protein that functions in carbohydrate partitioning. Plant Physiol 149: 181–194
Marger MD and Saier MH Jr (1993) A major superfamily of trans-membrane facilitators that catalyze uniport, symport and antiport. Trends Biochem Sci 18: 13–20
Matsukura C, Saitoh T, Hirose T, Ohsugi R, Perata P and Yamaguchi J (2000) Sugar uptake and transport in rice embryo. Expression of companion cell-specific sucrose transporter (OsSUT1) induced by sugar and light. Plant Physiol 124: 85–93
M’Batchi B and Delrot S (1988) Stimulation of sugar exit from leaf tissues of Vicia faba L. Planta 174: 340–348
McCaskill A and Turgeon R (2007) Phloem loading in Verbascum phoeniceum L. depends on the synthesis of raffinose-family oligosaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19619–19624
Meyer S, Melzer M, Truernit E, Hümmer C, Besenbeck, Stadler R and Sauer N (2000) AtSUC3, a gene encoding a new Arabidopsis sucrose transporter, is expressed in cells adjacent to the vascular tissue and in a carpel cell layer. Plant J 24: 869–882
Meyer S, Lauterbach C, Niedermeier M, Barth I, Sjolund RD and Sauer N (2004) Wounding enhances expression of AtSUC3, a sucrose transporter from Arabidopsis sieve elements and sink tissues. Plant Physiol 134: 684–693
Minchin PEH and Lacointe A (2005) New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modeling long-distance carbon transport. New Phytol 166: 771–779
Neubohn B, Gubatz S, Wobus U and Weber H (2000) Sugar levels altered by ectopic expression of a yeast-derived invertase affect cellular differentiation of developing cotyledons of Vicia narbonensis L. Planta 211: 325–334
Noiraud N, Delrot S and Lemoine R (2000) The sucrose transporter of celery. Identification and expression during salt stress. Plant Physiol 122: 1447–1455
Noiraud N, Maurousset L and Lemoine R (2001) Transport of polyols in higher plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 39: 717–728
Ohshima T, Hayashi H and Chino M (1990) Collection and chemical composition of pure phloem sap from Zea mays L.. Plant Cell Physiol 31: 735–737
Oliver SN, Van Dongen J, Alfred SC, Mamun EA, Zhao X, Saini HS, Fernandes SF, Blanchard CL, Sutton BG, Geigenberger P, Dennis ES and Dolferus R (2005) Cold-induced repression of the rice anther-specific cell wall invertase gene OsINV4 is correlated with sucrose accumulation and pollen sterility. Plant Cell Environ 28:1534–1541
Oparka KJ and Roberts AG (2001) Plasmodesmata: a not so open-and-shut case. Plant Physiol 125: 123–126
Oparka KJ, Duckett CM, Prior DAM and Fisher DB (1994) Real-time imaging of phloem unloading in the root tip of Arabidopsis. Plant J 6: 759–766
Oparka, K.J., Prior, D.A.M. and Wright, K.M. (1995) Symplastic communication between primary and developing lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 46: 187–198
Oparka KJ, Roberts AG, Boevink P, Santa Cruz S, Roberts I, Pradel KS, Imlau A, Kotlizky G, Sauer N and Epel B (1999) Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97: 743–754
Patrick JW and Offler CE (1995) Post-sieve element transport of sucrose in developing seeds. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 681–702
Patrick JW and Offler CE (1996) Post-sieve element transport of photoassimilate in sink regions. J Exp Bot 47: 1165–1177
Porfirova S, Bergmüller E, Tropf S, Lemke R and Dörmann P (2002) Isolation of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking vitamin E and identification of a cyclase essential for all tocopherol biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12495–12500
Provencher LM, Miao L, Sinha N and Lucas WJ (2001) Sucrose export defective1 encodes a novel protein implicated in chloroplast-to-nucleus signaling. Plant Cell 13: 1127–1141
Rae AL, Perroux JM and Grof CPL (2005) Sucrose partitioning between vascular bundles and storage parenchyma in the sugarcane stem: a potential role for the ShSUT1 sucrose transporter. Planta 220: 817–825
Reinders A, Schulze W, Kuhn C, Barker L, Schulz A, Ward JM and Frommer WB (2002) Protein-protein interactions between sucrose transporters of different affinities colocalized in the same enucleate sieve element. Plant Cell 14: 1567–1577
Reinders A, Sivitz AB, His A, Grof CP, Perroux JM and Ward JM (2006) Sugarcane ShSUT1: analysis of sucrose transport activity and inhibition by sucralose. Plant Cell Environ 29: 1871–1880
Reinders A, Sivitz A, Starker CG, Gantt JS and Ward JM (2008) Functional analysis of LjSUT4, a vacuolar sucrose transporter from Lotus japonicus. Plant Mol Biol 68: 289–299
Riesmeier JW, Willmitzer L and Frommer WB (1992) Isolation and characterization of sucrose carrier cDNA from spinach by functional expression in yeast. EMBO J 11: 4705–4713
Riesmeier JW, Hirner B and Frommer WB (1993) Potato sucrose transporter expression in minor veins indicates a role in phloem loading. Plant Cell 5: 1591–1598
Riesmeier JW, Willmitzer L and Frommer WB (1994) Evidence for an essential role of the sucrose transporter in phloem loading and assimilate partitioning. EMBO J 13: 1–7
Roberts AG and Oparka KJ (2003) Plasmodesmata and the control of symplastic transport. Plant Cell Environ 26: 103–124
Roblin G, Sakr S, Bonmort J and Delrot S (1998) Regulation of a plasma membrane sucrose transporter by phosphorylation. FEBS Lett 424: 165–168
Roitsch T and Tanner W (1996) Cell wall invertase: bridging the gap. Bot Acta 109: 90–93
Roitsch T, Balibrea ME, Hofmann M, Proels R and Sinha AK (2003) Extracellular invertase: key metabolic enzyme and PR protein. J Exp Bot 54: 513–524
Ruan Y-L and Patrick JW (1995) The cellular pathway of postphloem sugar transport in developing tomato fruit. Planta 196: 434–444
Ruan Y-L, Llewellyn DJ and Furbank RT (2000) Pathway and control of sucrose import into initiating cotton fibre cells. Aust J Plant Physiol 27: 795–800
Ruan Y-L, Llewellyn DJ and Furbank RT (2001) The control of single-celled cotton fibre elongation by developmentally reversible gating of plasmodesmata and coordinated expression of sucrose and K+ transporters and expansin. Plant Cell 13: 47–60
Ruan Y-L, Xu S-M, White R and Furbank RT (2004) Genotypic and developmental evidence for the role of plasmodesmatal regulation in cotton fiber elongation mediated by callose turnover. Plant Physiol 136: 4104–4113
Ruan YL, Llewellyn DJ, Furbank RT and Chourey PS (2005) The delayed initiation and slow elongation of fuzz-like short fibre cells in relation to altered pattern of sucrose synthase expression and plasmodesmata gating in a lintless mutant of cotton, J Ex Bot 56: 977–984
Russin WA, Evert RF, Vanderveer PJ, Sharkey TD and Briggs SP (1996) Modification of a specific class of plasmodesmata and loss of sucrose export ability in the sucrose export defective1 maize mutant. Plant Cell 8: 645–658
Ruuska SA, Girke T, Benning C and Ohlrogge JB (2002) Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed filling. Plant Cell 14: 1191–1206
Saier MH Jr (2000) Families of transmembrane sugar transport proteins. Mol Microbiol 35: 699–710
Sattler SE, Cahoon EB, Coughlan SJ and DellaPenna D (2003) Characterization of tocopherol cyclases from higher plants and cyanobacteria. Evolutionary implications for tocopherol synthesis and function. Plant Physiol 132: 2184–2195
Sauer N (2007) Molecular physiology of higher plant sucrose transporter. FEBS Lett. 581: 2309–2317
Sauer N and Stolz J (1994) SUC1 and SUC2: two sucrose transporters from Arabidopsis thaliana; expression and characterization in baker’s yeast and identification of the histidine-tagged protein. Plant J 6: 67–77
Sauer N, Ludwig A, Knoblauch A, Rothe P, Gahrtz M and Klebl F (2004) AtSUC8 and AtSUC9 encode functional sucrose transporters, but the closely related AtSUC6 and AtSUC7 genes encode aberrant proteins in different Arabidopsis ecotypes. Plant J 40: 120–130
Schnyder H (1993) The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source-sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling - a review. New Phytol 123: 233–245
Schobert C, Lucas WJ, Franceschi VR and Frommer WB (2000) Intercellular transport and phloem loading of sucrose, oligosaccharides and amino acids. In: Leegood RC, Sharkey TD and von Caemmerer S (eds) Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism, Advances in Photosynthesis, Vol 9, pp 249–274. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Schulze W, Weise A, Frommer WB and Ward JM (2000) Function of the cytosolic N-terminus of sucrose transporter AtSUT2 in substrate affinity. FEBS Lett 485: 189–194
Schulze WX, Reinders A, Ward J, Lalonde S and Frommer WB (2003) Interactions between co-expressed Arabidopsis sucrose transporters in the split-ubiquitin system. BMC Biochem 4: 3
Scofield GN, Hirose T, Gaudron JA, Upadhyaya NM, Ohsugi R and Furbank RT (2002) Antisense suppression of the rice sucrose transporter gene, OsSUT1, leads to impaired grain filling and germination but does not affect photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol 29: 815–826
Scofield GN, Aoki N, Hirose T, Takano M, Jenkins CLD and Furbank RT (2007a) The role of the sucrose transporter, OsSUT1, in germination and early seedling growth and development of rice plants. J Exp Bot 58: 483–495
Scofield GN, Hirose T, Aoki N and Furbank RT (2007b) Involvement of the sucrose transporter, OsSUT1, in the long-distance pathway for assimilate transport in rice. J Exp Bot 58: 3155–3169
Scofield GN, Ruuska SA, Aoki N, Lewis DC, Tabe LM and Jenkins CLD (2009) Starch storage in the stems of wheat plants: localization and temporal changes. Ann Bot 103: 859–868
Sheoran IS and Saini HS (1996) Drought-induced male sterility in rice: changes in carbohydrate levels and enzyme activities associated with the inhibition of starch accumulation in pollen. Sex Plant Reprod 9: 161–169
Sivitz AB, Reinders A and Ward JM (2005) Analysis of the transport activity of barley sucrose transporter HvSUT1. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 1666–1673
Sivitz AB, Reinders A and Ward JM (2008) Arabidopsis sucrose transporter AtSUC1 is important for pollen germination and sucrose induced anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Physiol 147: 92–100
Slewinski TL, Meeley R and Braun DM (2009) Sucrose transpoter1 functions in phloem loading in maize leaves. J Exp Bot 60: 881–892
Slewinski TL, Ma Y, Baker F, Huang M, Meeley R and Braun DM (2008) Determining the role of Tie-dyed1 in starch metabolism: epistasis analysis with maize ADP-Glucose pyrophosphorylase mutant lacking leaf starch. J Hered 99: 661–666
Sonnewald U, Brauer M, von Schaewen A, Stitt M and Willmitzer L (1991) Transgenic tobacco plants expressing yeast-derived invertase in either the cytosol, vacuole or apoplast: a powerful tool for studying sucrose metabolism and sink/source interactions. Plant J 1: 95–106
Sonnewald U, Hajirezaei MR, Kossmann J, Heyer A, Trethewey RN and Willmitzer L (1997) Increased potato tuber size resulting from expression of a yeast invertase. Nat Biotechnol 15: 794–797
Sreenivasulu N, Altschmied L, Radchuk V, Gubatz S, Wobus U and Weschke W (2004) Transcript profiles and deduced changes of metabolic pathways in maternal and filial tissues of developing barley grains. Plant J 37: 539–553
Stadler R, Brandner J, Schulz A, Gahrtz M and Sauer N (1995) Phloem loading by the PmSUC2 sucrose carrier from Plantago major occurs into companion cells. Plant Cell 7: 1545–1554
Stadler R, Truernit E, Gahrtz M and Sauer N (1999) The AtSUC1 sucrose carrier may represent the osmotic driving force for anther dehiscence and pollen tube growth in Arabodopsis. Plant J 19: 269–278
Takahashi S, Ishimaru K, Yazaki J, Fujii F, Shimbo K, Yamamoto K, Sakata K, Sasaki T, Kishimoto N and Kikuchi S (2005) Microarray analysis of sink-source transition in rice leaf sheaths. Breed Sci 55: 153–162
Takeda T, Toyofuku K, Matsukura C and Yamaguchi J (2001) Sugar transporters involved in flowering and grain development of rice. J Plant Physiol 158: 465–470
Tegeder M, Wang X-D, Frommer WB, Offler CE and Patrick JW (1999) Sucrose transport into developing seeds of Pisum sativum L. Plant J 18: 151–161
Thompson RG and Dale JE (1981) Export of 14C- and 11C-labelled assimilate from wheat and maize leaves: effects of parachloromercuribenzylsulphonic acid and fusicoccin and of potassium deficiency. Can J Bot 59: 2439–2444
Thorpe MR and Minchin PEH (1996) Mechanism of long and short distance transport from sources to sinks. In: Zamski E and Schaffer AA (eds) Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops: Source and Sink Relations, pp 261–282. Marcel Dekker, New York
Tomlinson KL, McHugh S, Labbe H, Grainger JL, James LE, Pomeroy KM, Mullin JW, Miller SS, Dennis DT and Miki BL (2004) Evidence that the hexose-to-sucrose ratio does not control the switch to storage product accumulation in oilseeds: analysis of tobacco seed development and effects of overexpressing apoplastic invertase. J Exp Bot 55: 2291–2303
Turgeon R (1991) Symplastic phloem loading and the sink-source transition in leaves: A model. In: Bonnemain J-L, Delrot S, Lucas WJ and Dainty J (eds) Recent Advances in Phloem Transport and Assimilate Compartmentation, pp 18–22. Ouest Editions, Nantes
Turgeon R and Gowan E (1990) Phloem loading in Coleus blumei in the absence of carrier-mediated uptake of export sugar from apoplast. Plant Physiol 94: 1244–1249
Turgeon R and Medville (1998) The absence of phloem loading in willow leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 12055–12060
Turgeon R and Medville R (2004) Phloem loading. A reevaluation of the relationship between plasmodesmatal frequencies and loading strategies. Plant Physiol 136: 3795–3803
Turgeon R and Wolf S (2008) Phloem transport: cellular pathway and molecular trafficking. Ann Rev Plant Biol 60: 207–221
Van Bel AJE (1993) Strategies of phloem loading. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 253–281
Van Bel AJE (1995) The low-profile directors of carbon and nitrogen economy in plants: parenchyma cells associated with translocation channels. In: Gartner BL (ed) Plant Stems: Physiology and Functional Morphology, pp 205–222. Academic Press, San Diego
Van Bel AJE (2003) The phloem, a miracle of ingenuity. Plant Cell Environ 26: 125–149
Van Bel AJE and Hess PH (2008) Hexoses as phloem transport sugars: the end of dogma? J Exp Bot 59: 261–272
Van Bel AJE, Gamalei YV, Ammerlaan A and Bik LPM (1992) Dissimilar phloem loading in leaves with symplasmic or apoplasmic minor-vein configurations. Planta 186: 518–525
Van Bel AJE, Ammerlaan A and Van Dijk AA (1994) A three-step screening procedure to identify the mode of phloem loading in intact leaves. Planta 192: 31–39
Van den Ende W, Clerens S, Vergauwen R, Van Riet L, Van Laere A Yoshida M and Kawakami A (2003) Fructan 1-exohydrolases. β-(2,1)-Trimmers during graminan biosynthesis in stems of wheat? Purification, characterization, mass mapping and cloning of two fructan 1-exohydrolase isoforms. Plant Physiol 131: 621–631
Vilhar B, Kladnik A, Blejec A, Chourey PS and Dermastia M (2002) Cytometrical evidence that the loss of seed weight in the miniature1 seed mutant of maize is associated with reduced mitotic activity in the developing endosperm. Plant Physiol 129: 23–30
Viola R, Roberts AG, Haupt S, Gazzani S, Hancock RD, Marmiroli N, Marchray N and Oparka KJ (2001) Tuberization in potato involves a switch from apoplastic to symplastic phloem unloading. Plant Cell 13: 385–398
Walsh KB, Sky C and Brown SM (1996) Pathway of sucrose unloading from the phloem in sugarcane stalk. In: Wilson JR, Hogarth DM, Campbell JA and Garside AL (eds) Sugarcane: Research Towards Efficient and Sustainable Production, pp 105–107. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Brisbane
Wardlaw IF and Willenbrink J (2000) Mobilization of fructan reserves and changes in enzyme activities in wheat stems correlate with water stress during kernel filling. New Phytol 148: 413–422
Weber H, Borisjuk L, Sauer N and Wobus U (1997) A role for sucrose transporters during seed development: molecular characterization of a hexose and a sucrose carrier in Faba bean seeds. Plant Cell 9: 895–908
Weber H, Heim U, Golombek S, Borisjuk L, Manteuffel R and Wobus U (1998) Expression of a yeast-derived invertase in developing cotyledons of Vicia narbonensis alters the carbohydrate state and affects storage functions. Plant J 16: 163–172
Weise A, Barker L, Kühn C, Lalonde S, Buschmann H, Frommer WB and Ward JM (2000) A new subfamily of sucrose transporters, SUT4, with low affinity/high capacity localized in enucleate sieve elements of plants. Plant Cell 12: 1345–1355
Weschke W, Panitz R, Sauer N, Wang Q, Neubohn B, Weber H and Wobus U (2000) Sucrose transport into barley seeds: molecular characterization of two transporters and implications for seed development and starch accumulation. Plant J 21: 455–467
Weschke W, Panitz R, Gubatz S, Wang Q, Radchuk R, Weber H and Wobus U (2003) The role of invertases and hexose transporters in controlling sugar ratios in maternal and filial tissues of barley caryopses during early development. Plant J 33: 395–411
Willenbrink J (2002) Assimilate transport in phloem: regulation and mechanism. Russ J Plant Physiol 49: 8–15
Williams LE, Lemoine R and Sauer N (2000) Sugar transporters in higher plants - a diversity of roles and complex regulation. Trends Plant Sci 5: 283–290
Winter H, Lohaus G and Heldt HW (1992) Phloem transport of amino acids in relation to cytosolic levels in barley leaves. Plant Physiol 99: 996–1004
Zhou Y, Qu H, Dibley KE, Offler CE and Patrick JW (2007) A suite of sucrose transporters expressed in coats of developing legume seeds includes novel pH-independent facilitators. Plant J 49: 750–764
Zimmermann MH and Ziegler H (1975) List of sugars and sugar alcohols in sieve-tube exudates. In: Zimmermann MH and Milburn JA (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series Vol 1, Transport in Plants 1, Phloem Transport, pp 480–503. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the help and encouragement of all our colleagues in sugar transport research, particularly those that made data available to us pre-publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aoki, N., Hirose, T., Furbank, R.T. (2012). Sucrose Transport in Higher Plants: From Source to Sink. In: Eaton-Rye, J., Tripathy, B., Sharkey, T. (eds) Photosynthesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1579-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1579-0_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1578-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1579-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)