Abstract
Off-the-shelf packages such as SAP need to be configured to suit the requirements of an organization. Reference models support the configuration of these systems. Existing reference models use rather traditional languages. For example, the SAP reference model uses Event-driven Process Chains (EPCs). Unfortunately, the choice construct within traditional process modeling languages like EPCs do not capture different scopes or impacts of decisions. That means they offer no opportunities to distinguish between decisions made for a single case (i. e. process instance) when executing the process and decisions made in advance for numerous cases impacting bigger parts of the company. This paper discusses the need for configurable process models. An analysis of configuration from a theoretical perspective provides a solid fundament for such models. Within the analysis a link is made to inheritance of dynamic behavior and previously defined inheritance concepts. By applying these concepts to process models the essence of configuration is determined, which enables the development of more mature configurable process modeling languages.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
van der Aalst, W. M. P.; Basten, T: Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science 270 (2002) 1–2, pp. 125–203.
van der Aalst, W. M. P.; Desel, J.; Kindler, E.: On the Semantics of EPCs: A Vicious Circle. In: Nüttgens, M.; Rump, F. J. (eds.): Proceedings of the EPK 2002: Business Process Management using EPCs. Bonn 2002, pp. 71–80.
van der Aalst, W. M. P.; van Hee, K. M.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. Cambridge 2002.
van der Aalst W. M. P.; ter Hofstede, A. H. M.: YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems 30 (2005) 4, pp. 245–275.
van der Aalst, W. M. P.; Dreiling, A.; Gottschalk, F.; Rosemann, M.; Jansen-Vullers, M. H.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: Bussler, C.; Haller, A. (eds.): Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2005 International Workshops, BPI, BPD, ENEI, BPRM, WSCOBPM, BPS. Revised Selected Papers. Volume 3812 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin et al. 2006, pp. 512–518.
Basten, T.; van der Aalst, W. M. P.: Inheritance of behavior. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 47 (2001) 2, pp. 47–145.
Becker, J.; Delfmann, P.; Knackstedt, R.: Konstruktion von Referenzmodellierungssprachen: Ein Ordnungsrahmen zur Spezifikation von Adaptionsmechanismen für Informationsmodelle. Wirtschaftsinformatik 46 (2004) 4, pp. 251–264.
Becker, J.; Kugeler, M.; Rosemann, M. (eds.): Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Berlin et al. 2003.
Bernus, P.: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1.6.3. IFIP-IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration, March 1999.
vom Brocke, J.; Buddendick, C.: Konstruktionstechniken für die Referenzmodellierung In: Becker, J.; Delfmann, P. (eds.): Referenzmodellierung. Grundlagen, Techniken und domänenbezogene Anwendung. Heidelberg 2004, pp. 19–48.
Curran, T.; Keller, G.: SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model. Upper Saddle River 1997.
Dreiling, A.; Rosemann, M.; van der Aalst, W. M. P.; Sadiq, W.; Khan, S.: Model-Driven Process Configuration of Enterprise Systems. In: Ferstl, O. K.; Sinz, E. J.; Eckert, S.; Isselhorst, T. (eds.): Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005. eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety. Heidelberg 2005, pp. 687–706.
Fettke, P.; Loos, P.: Methoden zur Wiederverwendung von Referenzmodellen-Übersicht und Taxonomie. In: Becker, J.; Knackstedt, R. (eds.): Referenzmodellierung 2002: Methoden — Modelle — Erfahrungen. Münster 2002, pp. 9–33.
van Glabbeek, R. J.; Weijland, W. P.: Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics. Journal of the ACM 43 (1996) 3, pp. 555–600.
Jablonski, S.; Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation. London 1996.
Keller, G.; Nüttgens, M.; Scheer, A.-W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Heft 89. Saarbrücken, 1992.
Kindler, E.: On the Semantics of EPCs: A Framework for Resolving the Vicious Circle. In: Desel, J.; Pernici, B.; Weske, M. (eds.): International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2004). Volume 3080 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin et al. 2004, pp. 82–97.
Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: Resolving the vicious circle. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 56 (2006) 1, pp. 23–40.
Milner, R.: A Calculus of Communicating Systems. Volume 92 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin et al. 1980.
Mendling, J.; Recker, J.; Rosemann, M.; van der Aalst, W. M. P.: Towards the Interchange of Configurable EPCs: An XML-based Approach for Reference Model Configuration. In: Desel, J.; Frank, U. (eds.): Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2005). Volume 75 of Lecture Notes in Informatics. Bonn 2005, pp. 8–21.
Owen, M.; Raj, J.: BPMN and Business Process Management — Introduction to the New Business Process Modeling Standard. Technical report, Popkin Software 2003.
Rickayzen, A.; Dart, J.; Brennecke, C.; Schneider, M.: Practical Workflow for SAP: Effective Business Processes using SAP’s WebFlow Engine. Bonn 2002.
Rosemann, M.; van der Aalst, W. M. P.: A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. To appear in: Information Systems 2005.
Rosemann, M.; Schütte, R.: Entwicklungsstand und Entwicklungsperspektiven der Referenzmodellierung. Arbeitsbericht 52 des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik. Münster 1997.
Rosemann, M.: Application Reference Models and Building Blocks for Management and Control (ERP Systems). In: Bernus, P.; Nemes, L.; Schmidt, G. (eds.): Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. Berlin et al. 2003, pp. 596–616.
Rosemann, M.: Komplexitätsmanagement in Prozessmodellen: Methodenspezifische Gestaltungsempfehlungen für die Informationsmodellierung. Wiesbaden 1996.
Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS: Business Process Modelling. Berlin et al. 2000.
Scheer, A.-W.: Business Process Engineering. Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Berlin et al. 1994.
Schütte, R.: Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Referenzmodellierung. Konstruktion konfigurations-und anpassungsorientierter Modelle. Wiesbaden 1998.
Schwegmann, A.: Objektorientierte Referenzmodellierung. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Wiesbaden 1999.
Staffware: Staffware 2000 / GWD User Manual. Berkshire 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H. (2007). Configurable Process Models — A Foundational Approach. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds) Reference Modeling. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1966-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1966-3_3
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1965-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1966-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)