Skip to main content

Fuzzy Multi-objective Approach to the Supply Chain Model

  • Conference paper
Multiple Objective and Goal Programming

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 12))

Abstract

Modern businesses face a more severe and challenging environment than before. For example, if an enterprise is requested to provide adequate commodities to its customers in different areas, it should be able to determine its own supply chain (SC) at the lowest-cost level immediately. If the enterprise’s response is not in time, the customers will feel unsatisfied and reduce their loyalty. The SC problem is formulated as a multi-level decision making problem in this study. Study results show that the fuzzy multi-objective approach can easily provide a satisfied solution at an acceptable achievement level of desired goals. Therefore, our study is valuable when designing a large-scale SC for practical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bard, J. F. and Falk, J. E., “An explicit solution to the multi-level programming problem,” Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 77–100, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellman, R. E. and Zadeh, L. A., “Decision making in fuzzy environment,” Management Science, Vol. 17B, No. 3, pp. 141–164, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya U., Rao, J. R. and Tiwari, R. N., “Fuzzy Multi-criteria Facility Location Problem,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 277–287, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourland, K. E., Powell, S. G. and Pyke, D. F., “Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 239–253, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Current, J. R., ReVelle, C. S. and Cohon, M. B., “The maximum covering/shortest path problem: A multiobjective network design and routing formulation,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 189–199, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demeulemeester, E. and Herroelen, W, “A branch-and bound procedure for the multiple resource-constrained project scheduling problem,” Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 1803–1818, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., and Roubens, M., Interactive Fuzzy Optimization, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg, D. E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Massachusetts, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hannan E. L., “Linear Programming with Multiple Fuzzy Goals,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 235–248, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ida, K. and Gen, M., “Improvement of Two-phase Approach for Solving Fuzzy Multiobjective Linear Programming,” Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 115–121, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, E. S. and Li, R. J., “Fuzzy multiple objective programming and compromise with Pareto optimum, ” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 275–288, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martison, F. K., “Fuzzy vs. Minmax Weighted Multiobjective Linear Programming: Illustrative Comparison,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 809–824, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michalewicz, Z., Genetic algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, Springer-Verlag Press, Berlin, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Oxe, G., “Reducing overcapacity in chemical plants by linear programming,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 809–824, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Petrovic, D., Roy, R. and Petrovic, R., “Modeling and simulation of a supply chain in an uncertain environment,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 299–309, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pyke, D. F. and Cohen, M. A., “Performance characteristics of stochastic integrated production-distribution systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 23–48, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasmusen, E., GAMES AND INFORMATION: AN INRRODUCTION TO GAME THEORY, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakawa M., Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization, Plenum Press, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakawa, M., Kato, K., Sunada, H. and Shibano, T., “Fuzzy Programming for Multiobjective 0–1 Programming Problems through Revised Genetic Algorithms,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 149–158, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarkis, J., “Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 159–174, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shih, H-S, Lai, Y-J and Lee, E. S., “Fuzzy approach for multi-level programming problems,” Computers Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 73–91, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, D. J. and Griffin, P. M., “Coordinated supply chain management,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 1–15, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyndall, G., Gopal, C., Partsch, W. and Kmuauff, J, Supercharging Supply Chains: New ways to increase value through global operational excellence, John Wiley Sons, Inc., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tzeng, G. H. and Tsaur, S. H., “Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Network Improvement Plan Model,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 49–74, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tzeng, G. H. and Chen, Y. W., “Implementing an Effective Schedule for Reconstructing Post-earthquake Road-network Based on Asymmetric Traffic Assignment— An Application of Genetic Algorithm,” International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management (IJOQM), Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 229–246, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vidal, C. J. and Goetschalckx, M., “Strategic production-distribution models: a critical review with emphasis on global supply chain models,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 1–18, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, P. L. and Seiford, L., Multilevel Decision Problems with Multiple Criteria Analysis — Operation Method, edited by Nijkamp, P., Gover Publishers, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, YW., Tzeng, GH. (2002). Fuzzy Multi-objective Approach to the Supply Chain Model. In: Trzaskalik, T., Michnik, J. (eds) Multiple Objective and Goal Programming. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 12. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1812-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1812-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1409-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1812-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics