Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lernen für Sicherheit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Factors und Patientensicherheit in der Akutmedizin

Zusammenfassung

Kap. 16 behandelt das Lernen in und von Organisationen. Konzepte aus anderen Hochrisikobereichen wie die der „zuverlässigen Organisation“ und der „lernenden Organisation“ könnten auch für die Medizin hilfreich sein, da sie den Denkrahmen für die tägliche Arbeit verändern. Komplexe Organisationen wie Krankenhäuser werden sich aber nicht mit einfachen „Erfolgsrezepten“ und isolierten Maßnahmen verändern lassen. Instrumente wie Incident-Reporting-Systeme und Fallanalysen, Notfalltraining und Skillstraining am Simulator und regelmäßige Teamtrainings sollten integrative Bestandteile übergreifender Konzepte der Organisationsentwicklung sein. Unter den aktuellen ökonomischen Bedingungen ist es wichtiger denn je, dass alle Mitarbeitenden von Krankenhäusern und Rettungsdiensten die Themen Patientensicherheit, Fehlervermeidung und zuverlässiges Handeln auf ihrer persönlichen Agenda haben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2012) Learning from defects tool. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/cusptoolkit/toolkit/learndefects.html. Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2019

  • Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit (2020) Handlungsempfehlung Fallanalyse. APS, Berlin. https://www.aps-ev.de/handlungsempfehlungen/

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit, Plattform Patientensicherheit, Stiftung Patientensicherheit (Hrsg) (2016) Einrichtung und erfolgreicher Betrieb eines Berichts- und Lernsystems (CIRS). Handlungsempfehlung für stationäre Einrichtungen im Gesundheitswesen. APS, Berlin. https://www.aps-ev.de/handlungsempfehlungen/. Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Amalberti R, Berwick D, Barach P (2005) Five System Barriers to Achieving Ultrasafe Health Care. Annals of Internal Medicine 142(9): 756–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Amalberti R, Mosneron-Dupin ERR (1997) Facteurs humains et fiabilité: quelles démarches pratiques? Octares, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1999) Die Lernende Organisation. Grundlagen, Methode, Praxis. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1972) Steps towards an ecology of mind. Chandler, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BGBI (2013) Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechte von Patientinnen und Patienten (Patientenrechtegesetz). http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/pdfs/Gesetze/Verkuendung_BGBl_Patientenrechte.pdf?__blob = publicationFile

  • Blum LL (1971) Equipment design and “human” limitations. Anesthesiology 35:101–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tavares W, Reeves S, Tricco AC (2014) Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Can J Anesth 61(6):571–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CIRS (1998) The Anaesthesia critical incident reporting system on the internet. http://www.medana.unibas.ch/cirs/intreng.htm

  • Cosby E (2013) Review article: the role of practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine in perioperative patient safety. Can J Anaesth 60:143–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuong Pham J, Hoffman C, Popescu IC, Ijagbemi OC (2013) Concise incident analysis tool. http://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/en/toolsResources/Research/commissionedResearch/IncidentAnalysisMethodPilotStudy/Documents/Concise%20Incident%20Analysis%20Tool%20-%20Version%201.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2019

  • Davies HTO, Nutley SM (2000) Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. BMJ 320:998–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Degani A, Wiener EL (1993) Cockpit checklists: concepts, design, and use. Hum Fact 35:345–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann P, Friis SM, Lippert A et al (2012) Goals, success factors, and barriers for simulation-based learning: a qualitative interview study in health care. Simul Gaming 43(5):627–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbruch B, Meyer I (2016) Ausarbeitung von Arbeitshilfen zur methodischen Ereignisanalyse und Ergebnisauswertung zur Fortschreibung des Standes der Technik. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Firth-Cozens J (2002) Barriers to incident reporting. Quality and Safety in Health Care 11 (1): 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2008) Safety at the sharp end. A guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Maran N (2004) Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl):i80–i84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba DM, Howard S, Fish K, Smith B, Sowb Y (2001). Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resoure management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation & Gaming 32(2): 175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin DA, Edmondson AC, Gino F (2008) Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev 86(3):109–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G-BA Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (2014) Beschluss zum klinischen RM. https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-1919/2014-01-23_KQM-RL_137-1d_BAnz.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2019

  • G-BA Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (2016) Beschluss des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Qualitätsmanagement-Richtlinie vom 15.9.2016, BAnz AT 15.11.2016 B2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackstein A, Hagemann V, v. Kaufmann F, Regener H (2016) Handbuch Simulation. Stumpf + Kossendey, Edewecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagley G, Mills PD, Watts BV, Wu A (2019) Review of alternatives to root cause analysis: developing a robust system for incident report analysis. BMJ Open Qual. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000646 Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, Brooks J (2001) Helping the helpers: the role of critical incident stress management. Crit Care 5:315–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich B, Merrit AC (1998) Culture at work in aviation and medicine. National, organizational and professional influences. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert PD, Thomas MJW, Deakin A, Runciman WB, Braithwaite J, Lomax S, Prescott J, Gorrie G, Szczygielski A, Surwald T, Fraser C (2018) Are root cause analyses recommendations effective and sustainable? An observational study. Int J Qual Health Care 30(2):124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff LA, Adamowski K (1998) Creating excellence in crisis care: a guide to effective training and program designs. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofinger G (2018) Human Factors für Simulationstrainings. In: Pierre M, Breuer G (Hrsg) Simulation in der Medizin – Grundlegende Konzepte – Klinische Anwendung, 2., komplett überarbeitete Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg, S 177–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofinger G (2010) CIRS als Instrument des gemeinsamen Lernens im Krankenhaus – Voraussetzungen und Barrieren. Wirtschaftspsychologie,12(4), Sonderheft „Aus Fehlern lernen“: 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofinger G, Waleczek H, Horstmann R (2007) Erwartete und unerwartete Probleme bei der Einführung eines Fehlerberichtssystems im Krankenhaus. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsentwicklung 38(3): 295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2012) FRAM—The functional resonance analysis method. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • James RK, Gilliland BE (2001) Crisis intervention strategies, 4. Aufl. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnle S (2000) Lernende Organisationen im Gesundheitswesen: Erfolgsfaktoren von Veränderungsprozessen. Deutscher Universitätsverlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Leape L (2002) Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 347(20):1633–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman LC (1992) Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simul Gaming 23:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N, Thomas JP (2018) STPA handbook. https://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/get_file.php?name=STPA_handbook.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Sept. 2018

  • Lewin K (1951) Field theory in social science. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Norton J Boulanger B, Yates A, Swartz CH, Smith A, Holbrook PJ, Moore M, Latham B, Williams MV (2015) “SWARMing” to improve patient care: a novel approach to root cause analysis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 41(11):494–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macrae C (2016) The problem with incident reporting. BMJ Qual Saf 25(2):71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manser T, Perry J, Schmutz J (2012) Verhalten ist messbar: Behavioural Marker Systeme und Kompetenzentwicklung. In St.Pierre M & Breuer G (Hrsg) Simulation in der Medizin. Heidelberg: Springer, 159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, Dale T, Hirst G, Catchpole K (2009) The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18(2):109–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonell LK, Kimberly KJ, Dismukes RK (1997) Facilitating LOS debriefings: a training manual, NASA Technical Memorandum 112192, March 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • National Patient Safety Foundation (2016) RCA2: improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm. NPSF, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus C, Lutnaes DE, Bergström J (2019) Medical teamwork and the evolution of safety science: a critical review. Cog Techn Work

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell R (2003) Medicine and aviation: a review of the comparison. Methods Inf Med 42(4):433–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1987) The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In: Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (Hrsg) New technology and human error. Wiley, Chichester, S 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman WB, Sellen A, Webb RA, Williamson JA, Currie M, Morgan C, Russell WJ (1993) The Australian incident monitoring study. Errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care 21:506–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rushmer R, Davies HTO (2004) Unlearning in health care. Qual Saf health Care 13(SupplII):ii10–ii15

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Russ S, Rout S, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K, Darzi A, Vincent C (2013) Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review. Ann Surg 258(6):856–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC (2006) Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Hum Factors 48(2):392–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Almeida SA, Salisbury M, King H, Lazzara EH, Lyons R, Wilson KA, Almeida PA, McQuillan R (2009) What are the critical success factors for team training in health care? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35(8):398–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz J, Manser T (2013) Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review. Br J Anaesth 110(4):529–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1975) Deutero-learning in organizations: learning for increased effectiveness. Organ Dyn 4:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg G (1999) Organisation: Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schrappe M (2018) APS-Weißbuch Patientensicherheit. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, Herausgegeben vom Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpfer G, Gförer R, Schleppers A (2007) Anästhesisten lernen – lernen Institutionen auch? Anaesthesist 56:983–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (2011) Die fünfte Disziplin Kunst und Praxis der lernenden Organisation, 11. Aufl. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 320:745–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shojania KG (2008) The frustrating case of incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care 17(6):400–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood D (2000) The unlearning organization. Bus Strategy Rev 11:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoyer WE, Embi PJ, Moffatt-Bruce S (2016) Creating local learning health systems. Think globally, Act Locally. JAMA 316:2481–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staender S (2000) Critical incident reporting. With a view on approaches in Anaesthesiology. In: Vincent C, de Mol B (Hrsg) Safety in medicine. Pergamon Elsevier Science, Amsterdam New York, S 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinwachs B (1992) How to facilitate a debriefing. Simul Gaming 23:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson L, Paerson D, Lucas B (2006) Developing a learning culture: twelve tips for individuals, teams and organizations. Med Teach 28(4):309–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St.Pierre M, Breuer G (Hrsg) (2018) Simulation in der Medizin, 2. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujan M (2015) An organisation without a memory: A qualitative study of hospital staff perceptions on reporting and organisational learning for patient safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 144:45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Adams S, Vincent C (2004) Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the london protocol. Clinical Safety Research Unit, University College, London. http://www.csru.org.uk

  • The Joint Commission International (2015) Root cause analysis in health care: tools and techniques, 5. Aufl. Joint Commission Resources, Oak Brook

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (2004) The human factor. Revolutionizing the way people live with technology. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring J (2005) Beyond Blame: Cultural Barriers to Medical Incident Reporting. Social Sciences & Medicine 60(9):1927–1935

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan CA, Williamson JA, Mackay P, Russell WJ, Runciman WB (1993) The Australian incident monitoring study: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 21:520–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner T (1992) Sicherheit als Fehlerfreundlichkeit [Safety as error friendliness]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich R (1993) Cockpit resource management. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk S (2017) Kommunikationsfehler in der präklinischen Notfallmedizin. Eine Analyse der Critical-Incident-Reporting-System Datenbank in Deutschland. Dissertation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E (2005) Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care 14:303–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) WHO draft guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems. From Information to action. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/Reporting_Guidelines.pdf. Zugegriffen: 30. Juni 2014

  • Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S (2003) Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 78(8):783–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland

    Michael St.Pierre

  2. Team HF - Human Factors Forschung Beratung und Training, Hofinger, Künzer & Mähler PartG, Ludwigsburg, Deutschland

    Gesine Hofinger

Authors
  1. Michael St.Pierre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gesine Hofinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael St.Pierre .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

St.Pierre, M., Hofinger, G. (2020). Lernen für Sicherheit. In: Human Factors und Patientensicherheit in der Akutmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60485-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60485-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-60484-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-60485-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation