Skip to main content

Governance der Akteure einer digitalen Plattform

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management digitaler Plattformen

Zusammenfassung

Mehrseitige Plattformen (MSPs) beeinflussen die ökonomische Landschaft und somit etablierte Industrien nachhaltig. Daher wird es immer wichtiger zu untersuchen, wie und warum diese Plattformen an wirtschaftlicher Relevanz gewinnen. Das Herzstück, um die Interaktion zwischen den beteiligten Parteien einer Plattform zu orchestrieren, ist die sogenannte Plattform-Governance.

Dieses Kapitel basiert auf der bereits von Hein et al. (2016) durchgeführten Studie zu Governance-Mechanismen auf digitalen Plattformen.

Das Forschungsprojekt ExCELL wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) gefördert (Förderkennzeichen: 01MD15001D).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Airbnb (2017) AirBnb Website. www.airbnb.com. Abgerufen am 01.11.2017.

  • Bond AT (2014) An app for that: Local governments and the rise of the sharing economy. Notre Dame Law Review Online 90 (2): S. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2008) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champoux V, Durgee J, McGlynn L (2012) Corporate Facebook pages: when “fans” attack. Journal of Business Strategy 33 (2): S. 22-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS (2012) Governing bad behavior by users of multi-sided platforms. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2 (27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Facebook (2017) Facebook Website. www.facebook.com. Abgerufen am 01.11.2017.

  • Fautrero V, Gueguen G (2013) The Dual Dominance of The Android Business Ecosystem. Understanding Business Ecosystems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes (2014) Alibaba Claims Title For Largest Global IPO Ever With Extra Share Sales. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanmac/2014/09/22/alibaba-claims-title-for-largest-global-ipo-ever-with-extra-share-sales/. Abgerufen am 01.07.2015.

  • Goodman MB, Dekay SH (2012) How large companies react to negative Facebook comments. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 17 (3): S. 289-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 43: S. 162-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein A, Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016) Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanisms of multi-sided platforms, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Ilmenau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac E (2014) Disruptive Innovation: Risk-Shifting and Precarity in the Age of Uber, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manner J, Nienaber D, Schermann M, Krcmar H (2013) Six Principles for Governing Mobile Platforms, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin G (2014) Uber Now Integrates With United And Hyatt Apps. http://www.forbes.com/sites/grantmartin/2014/08/22/uber-now-integrates-with-united-and-hyatt-apps/. Abgerufen am 01.07.2015.

  • Pagano D, Maalej W (2013) User feedback in the appstore: An empirical study, 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brasilien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pon B, Seppälä T, Kenney M (2014) Android and the demise of operating system-based power: Firm strategy and platform control in the post-PC world. Telecommunications Policy 38 (11): S. 979-991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermann M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2012) The role of information systems in supporting exploitative and exploratory management control activities. Journal of Management Accounting Research 24 (1): S. 31-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Finke R, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017a) Sandbox vs. Toolbox–Analysis of Boundary Resources in B2B Software Platforms, European Workshop on Software Ecosystems (EWSECO), Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Hakes C, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017b) Governing Platforms in the Internet of Things, International Conference on Software Business, Essen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M (2017) How established companies leverage IT platforms for value co-creation – Insights from banking, Twenty-fifth European Conference on Information Systems, Guimarães, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Hein A, Krcmar H (2016a) Governance of nonprofit platforms – Onboarding mechanisms for a refugee information platform, SIG GlobDev Ninth Annual Workshop, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016b) Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems – Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research, Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017c) Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems – an information platform for refugees. Information Technology for Development 23 (3): S. 618-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017d) The Platform Owner’s Challenge to Capture Value – Insights from a Business-to-Business IT Platform, International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, Südkorea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staykova KS, Damsgaard J (2014) Platform Expansion Design as Strategic Choice: The Case of WeChat and Kakaotalk, European Conference on Information Systems, Istanbul, Türkei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzman F, Gross R, Acquisti A (2013) Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 4 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan B, Pan SL, Lu X, Huang L (2015) The Role of IS Capabilities in the Development of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Digital Ecosystem Strategy of Alibaba. com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16 (4): S. 248-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson D, Sørensen C, Lyytinen K (2012) Change and control paradoxes in mobile infrastructure innovation: the Android and iOS mobile operating systems cases, 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Manoa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research 21 (4): S. 675-687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uber (2017) Uber Website. www.uber.com. Abgerufen am 01.11.2017.

  • van Alstyne MP, Geoffrey; Choudary, Paul Sangeet (2016) 6 Reasons Platforms Fail. Harvard Business Review 31 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigmann F (2016) AXOOM is developing into a sought-after business platform for the manufacturing industry. AXOOM GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesche M, Berwing C, Schermann M, Krcmar H (2011a) Patterns for Understanding Control Requirements for Information Systems for Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC IS), CAiSE Workshops.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesche M, Schermann M, Krcmar H (2011b) Understanding the Role of Information Technology for Organizational Control Design: Risk Control as New Control Mechanism. In: Blinn N, Schirmer I, Kautz K (Hrsg.) Governance and sustainability in information systems. Managing the transfer and diffusion of IT. Springer, S. 135-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2013) Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Schreieck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreieck, M., Hein, A., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H. (2018). Governance der Akteure einer digitalen Plattform. In: Wiesche, M., Sauer, P., Krimmling, J., Krcmar, H. (eds) Management digitaler Plattformen. Informationsmanagement und digitale Transformation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21214-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21214-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21213-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21214-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics