Abstract
The Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) is an increasingly important industry standard for the graphical representation of business processes. BPMN offers a wide range of modeling constructs, significantly more than other popular languages. However, not all of these constructs are equally important in practice as business analysts frequently use arbitrary subsets of BPMN. In this paper we investigate what these subsets are, and how they differ between academic, consulting, and general use of the language. We analyzed 120 BPMN diagrams using mathematical and statistical techniques. Our findings indicate that BPMN is used in groups of several, well-defined construct clusters, but less than 20% of its vocabulary is regularly used and some constructs did not occur in any of the models we analyzed. While the average model contains just 9 different BPMN constructs, models of this complexity have typically just 4-5 constructs in common, which means that only a small agreed subset of BPMN has emerged. Our findings have implications for the entire ecosystems of analysts and modelers in that they provide guidance on how to reduce language complexity, which should increase the ease and speed of process modeling.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BPMI.org, OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification. Final Adopted Specification. Object Management Group (2006), http://www.bpmn.org
Fowler, M.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide To The Standard Object Modelling Language, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Massachusetts (2004)
Siau, K., Cao, Q.: Unified Modeling Language: A Complexity Analysis. Journal of Database Management 12, 26–34 (2001)
Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P.: A Study of the Evolution of the Representational Capabilities of Process Modeling Grammars. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 447–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Siau, K., Erickson, J., Lee, L.Y.: Theoretical vs. Practical Complexity: The Case of UML. Journal of Database Management 16, 40–57 (2005)
Kobryn, C.: UML 2001: A Standardization Odyssey. Communications of the ACM 42, 29–37 (1999)
Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Pattern-based Translation of BPMN Process Models to BPEL Web Services. International Journal of Web Services Research 5, 42–61 (2008)
Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology- versus Pattern-based Evaluation of Process Modeling Languages: A Comparison. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20, 774–799 (2007)
Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: How Good is BPMN Really? Insights from Theory and Practice. In: Ljungberg, J., Andersson, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Goeteborg, Sweden, pp. 1582–1593 (2006)
zur Muehlen, M., Ho, D.T.-Y.: Service Process Innovation: A Case Study of BPMN in Practice. In: Sprague Jr., R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 41th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Hawaii (2008)
Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An Analytical Evaluation of BPMN Using a Semiotic Quality Framework. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research, vol. 5, pp. 102– 113. Idea Group, Hershey, Pennsylvania (2006)
Barabási, A.-L., Bonabeau, E.: Scale-Free Networks. Scientific American 288, 50–59 (2003)
Li, W.: Random Texts Exhibit Zipf’s-Law-Like Word Frequency Distribution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 38, 1842–1845 (1992)
Zipf, G.K.: On the Dynamic Structure of Concert Programs. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41, 25–36 (1946)
Hamming, R.W.: Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes. Bell System Technical Journal 26, 147–160 (1950)
Rossi, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Complexity Metrics for Systems Development Methods and Techniques. Information Systems 21, 209–227 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muehlen, M.z., Recker, J. (2013). How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. In: Bubenko, J., Krogstie, J., Pastor, O., Pernici, B., Rolland, C., Sølvberg, A. (eds) Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36925-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36926-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)