Abstract
Business process models are increasingly used by companies, often yielding repositories of several thousand models. These models are of great value for business analysis such as service identification or process standardization. A problem is though that many of these analyses require the pairwise comparison of process models, which is hardly feasible to do manually given an extensive number of models. While the computation of similarity between a pair of process models has been intensively studied in recent years, there is a notable gap on automatically matching activities of two process models. In this paper, we develop an approach based on semantic techniques and probabilistic optimization. We evaluate our approach using a sample of admission processes from different universities.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Information Systems 36, 498–516 (2010)
Grigori, D., Corrales, J.C., Bouzeghoub, M., Gater, A.: Ranking bpel processes for service discovery. IEEE T. Services Computing 3(3), 178–192 (2010)
Zha, H., Wang, J., Wen, L., Wang, C., Sun, J.: A workflow net similarity measure based on transition adjacency relations. Computers in Industry 61(5), 463–471 (2010)
Becker, M., Laue, R.: A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Computers in Industry 63(2), 148–167 (2012)
Niemann, M., Siebenhaar, M., Schulte, S., Steinmetz, R.: Comparison and retrieval of process models using related cluster pairs. Computers in Industry 63(2), 168–180 (2012)
Kunze, M., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Behavioral Similarity – A Proper Metric. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., Käärik, R.: Aligning business process models. In: IEEE International EDOC Conference 2009, pp. 45–53 (2009)
Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Roddick, J., Hinze, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2007), vol. 67, pp. 71–80. Australian Computer Science Communications, Ballarat (2007)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 467–482 (2010)
Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Information Systems 37(5), 443–459 (2012)
Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)
Lee, J.H., Kim, M.H., Lee, Y.J.: Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in is-a hierarchies. Journal of Documentation 49(2), 188–207 (1993)
Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)
Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 448–453. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1995)
Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645527.657297
Gal, A.: Uncertain Schema Matching. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2011)
Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 37(3), 410–429 (2011)
Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Markov logic networks. Machine Learning 62(1-2), 107–136 (2006)
Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press (2009)
Getoor, L., Taskar, B.: Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press (2007)
Manning, C.D., Schütze, H.: Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press (1999)
Niepert, M., Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2010)
Noessner, J., Niepert, M.: CODI: Combinatorial Optimization for Data Integration–Results for OAEI 2010. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Ontology Matching (2010)
Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Analyzing mapping extraction approaches. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Matching (2007)
Riedel, S.: Improving the accuracy and efficiency of MAP inference for Markov logic. In: Proc. of UAI 2008, pp. 468–475 (2008)
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer (2007)
Doan, A., Halevy, A.Y.: Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AI Magazine 26(1), 83–94 (2005)
Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record 33(4), 65–70 (2004)
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal 18(3), 265–280 (2003)
Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation. In: Spaccapietra, S., Atzeni, P., Fages, F., Hacid, M.-S., Kifer, M., Mylopoulos, J., Pernici, B., Shvaiko, P., Trujillo, J., Zaihrayeu, I. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics IX. LNCS, vol. 4601, pp. 1–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leopold, H., Niepert, M., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R., Stuckenschmidt, H. (2012). Probabilistic Optimization of Semantic Process Model Matching. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32884-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32885-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)